Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Evaluation in Foreign Language Education in the Middle East and North Africa pp 251–270Cite as

An Evaluation of the Challenges of Sudanese Linguistics and English Language-Related Studies’ Ph.D. Candidates: An Exploratory Qualitative Study

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

  • 587 Accesses

Part of the book series: Second Language Learning and Teaching ((SLLT))

Abstract

This qualitative evaluative study is based on semi-structured interviews with two Sudanese professor supervisors and three Ph.D. candidates who have recently completed their Ph.D. study in linguistics and English language-related studies at the Graduate College, University of Khartoum, Sudan. The study explored and evaluated the problems and challenges Ph.D. candidates encountered during their candidature from the perspectives of both supervisors and candidates themselves: How do these challenges impact on their study? How do they cope with these challenges? How can these challenges be overcome? The study provided new insights into doctoral education in Sudan, specifically in the University of Khartoum. The study adopted a qualitative methodology with semi-structured face-to-face interviews being the principal method of data collection along with the collection of some institutional documents, some of which are being used during interviews in a discourse-based format. Five tape-recorded interviews were conducted with both candidates and supervisors. Interview data were coded and analyzed inductively. Results of data analysis revealed that there were many problems and challenges doctoral students experienced throughout their Ph.D. candidature, such as supervision-related challenges, resources-related and organizational challenges. In addition, there were a number of strategies candidates reportedly used to deal with these challenges and both candidates and supervisors reportedly held varied perceptions about what makes a good quality Ph.D.. The study recommendations, implications along with its limitations and suggestions for further research were presented and discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Arabicisation is the use of Arabic as a sole medium of instruction in the higher education intuitions. The policies were introduced in the 1970s but practically came into effect in the 1990s.

References

  • Ayiro, L. P., & Sang, J. K. (2011). The awards of the PhD in Kenyan universities: A quality assurance perspective. Quality in Higher Education, 17(2), 163–178. doi:10.1080/13538322.2011.582794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brydon, K., & Fleming, J. (2011). The journey around my PhD: Pitfalls, insights and diamonds. Social Work Education: The International Journal, 30(8), 995–1011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coffey, A., & Atkinson, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denicolo, P. (2003). Assessing the PhD: A constructive view of criteria. Quality Assurance in Education, 11(2), 84–91. doi:10.1108/09684880310471506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dysthe, O., Samara, A., & Westrheim, K. (2006). Multivoiced supervision of master’s students: A case study of alternative supervision practices in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 31(3), 299–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, B. (2002). Postgraduate supervision: Is having a PhD enough? In paper presented to the Australian Association for research in Education Conference. Australia: Brisbane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fergie, G., Beek, S., McKenna, C., & Creme, P. (2011). It’s a lonely walk: Supporting postgraduate research through writing. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher education, 23(2), 236–245, available online at http://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe/

  • Gulbrandsen, J. M. (2000). Research quality and organisational factors. An investigation of the relationship. Trondheim: Department of industrial economics and technology management. Norwegian University of Science and Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunnarsson, R., Jonasson, G., & Billhult, A. (2013). The experience of disagreement between students and supervisors in PhD education: A qualitative study. BMC Medical Education, 13(134), 1–8. Available on http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/13/134

  • Halse, C., & Malfroy, J. (2010). Retheorizing doctoral supervision as professional work. Studies in Higher Education, 35(1), 79–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasrati, M. (2005). Legitimate peripheral participation and supervising PhD students. Studies in Higher Education, 30(5), 557–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heath, T. (2002). A quantitative analysis of PhD students’ views of supervision. Higher Education Research & Development, 21(1), 41–53. doi:10.1080/07294360220124648.

  • Hockey, J. (1996). A contractual solution to problems in the supervision of PhD degrees in the UK. Studies in Higher Education, 21(3), 359–371. Available on doi: 10.1080/03075079612331381271

  • Hockey, J. (1994). Establishing boundaries: Problems and solutions in managing the PhD supervisor’s role. Cambridge Journal of Education, 24(2), 293–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krase, E. (2007). May be the communication between us was not enough: Inside a dysfunctional advisor/L2 advisee relationship. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6(1), 55–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyvik, S., & Thune, T. (2014). Assessing the quality of PhD dissertations: A survey of external committee members. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(5), 768–782. doi:10.1080/02602938.2014.956283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, A. (2008). How are doctoral students supervised? Concepts of doctoral research supervision. Studies in Higher Education, 33(3), 267–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lillis, T. M. (2001). Student writing: Access, regulation, desire. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löfström, E., & Pyhältö, K. (2014). Ethical issues in doctoral supervision: The perspectives of PhD students in the natural and behavioral sciences. Ethics & Behaviour, 24(3), 195–214. Available on doi:10.1080/10508422.20133.830574

  • Mahmood, S. T. (2011). Factors affecting the quality of research in education: Student’s perceptions. Journal of Education & Practice, 2(11), 34–40. Available on www. iiste.org.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackinnon, J. (2004). Academic supervision: Seeking metaphors and models for quality. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 28(4), 397–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manathunga, C., & Lant, P. (2006). How do we ensure good PhD student outcomes? Education for Chemical Engineers, 1(72), 72–81. doi:10.1205/ece.05003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J. (2002). Qualitative researching (2nd ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., Rowe, K. J., & Martin, A. (2002). PhD students’ evaluations of research supervision: Issues, complexities, and challenges in a nationwide Australian experiment in benchmarking universities. The Journal of Higher Education, 73(3), 313–348. Available on http://www.org/stable/1558460

  • McCarthy, G., Hegarty, J., Savage, E., & Fitzpatrick, J. (2010). PhD away days: A component of PhD supervision. International Nursing Review, 57(4), 415–418. Available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1466-7657.2010.00828.x/full

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morley, L., Leonard, D., & David, M. (2003). Quality and equality in British PhD assessment. Quality Assurance in Education, 11(2), 64–72. doi:10.1108/09684880310471489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullins, G., & Kiley, M. (2002). It’s a PhD, not a Nobel Prize: How experienced examiners assess research theses. Studies in Higher Education, 27(4), 369–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odell, L., Goswami, D., & Herrington, A. (1983). The discourse-based interview: A procedure for exploring the tacit knowledge of writers in nonacademic settings. In P. Mosenthal, L. Tamor, & S. A. Walmsley (Eds.), Research on writing: Principles and methods. (pp. 221–236). New York, NY: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyhältö, K., Toom, A., Stubb, J., & Lonka, K. (2012). Challenges of becoming a scholar: A study of doctoral students’ problems and well-being. International Scholarly Research Network, 1–12. Doi:1.5402/2012/934941.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, J. H. (2009). From professional to PhD student: Challenges of status transition. Teaching in Higher Education, 14(6), 687–691. Available on doi:10.1080/13562510903315357

  • Winter, R., Griffiths, M., & Green, K. (2000). The academic qualities of practice: What are the criteria for a practice-based PhD? Studies in Higher Education, 25(1), 25–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeegers, M. & Barron, D. (2012). Pedagogical concerns in doctoral supervision: A challenge for pedagogy. Quality Assurance in Education, 20(1), 20–30. Available on doi:10.1108/09684881211198211

  • https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=university+of+khartoum

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Khartoum, Khartoum, Sudan

    Awad Alhassan

  2. University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, UK

    Holi Ibrahim Holi Ali

Authors
  1. Awad Alhassan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Holi Ibrahim Holi Ali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Awad Alhassan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. English Language Institute, University of Jeddah , Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

    Sahbi Hidri

  2. Higher Colleges of Technology , Dubai, United Arab Emirates

    Christine Coombe

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Alhassan, A., Ali, H.I.H. (2017). An Evaluation of the Challenges of Sudanese Linguistics and English Language-Related Studies’ Ph.D. Candidates: An Exploratory Qualitative Study. In: Hidri, S., Coombe, C. (eds) Evaluation in Foreign Language Education in the Middle East and North Africa. Second Language Learning and Teaching. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43234-2_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43234-2_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-43233-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-43234-2

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation