Skip to main content

Defining Securitization, Enemy Images, and Memory

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Security Threats and Public Perception

Part of the book series: New Security Challenges ((NSECH))

  • 1475 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter I begin to examine three approaches to the study of threat narratives that are used in this book: securitization, enemy image research, and memory studies. Even though securitization provides the list of felicity conditions that are supposed to map out the success or failure of securitization as a process, it has a number of limitations with regard to the audience and analysis of threat narratives. Thus, securitization provides a detailed account of political processes but does not address the classification of threats, even though the latter is an intrinsic notion within the securitization framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abizadeh, A. 2005. Does Collective Identity Presuppose an Other? On the Alleged Incoherence of Global Solidarity. American Political Science Review 99(01): 45–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abou Assi, E. 2010. Collective Memory and Management of the Past: The Entrepreneurs of Civil War Memory in Post-War Lebanon. International Social Science Journal 61(202): 399–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adamides, C. 2009. The Cyprus Conflict: Evidence of Institutionalized Securitization. 5th hellenic observatory PhD symposium on contemporary Greece and Cyprus. London: London School of Economics and Political Science, June 25–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albrecht, S. 2006. Whose Voice is Heard in Online Deliberation? A Study of Participation and Representation in Political Debates on the Internet. Communication and Society 9: 62–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allport, G. 1954. The Nature of Prejudice. Reading MA: Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amodio, D., and M. Lieberman. 2009. Pictures in Our Heads: Contributions of FMRI to the Study of Prejudice and Stereotyping. In Handbook of Prejudice, Stereotyping and Discrimination, ed. Todd Nelson. New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aradau, C. 2004. Security and the Democratic Scene: Desecuritization and Emancipation. Journal of International Relations and Development 7: 388–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Assmann, J. 1992. Das kulturelle Gedächtnis: Schrift, Erinnerung und politische Identität in frühen Hochkulturen. Munich: Beck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Assmann, A. 2006. Der Lange Schatten der Vergangenheit: Erinnerungskultur und Geschichtspolitik. Munich: Beck.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. Cultural Memory and Western Civilization: Functions, Media, Archives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Balzacq, T. 2005. The Three Faces of Securitization: Political Agency, Audience and Context. European Journal of International Relations 11(2): 171–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. ed. 2011. Securitization Theory: How Security Problems Emerge and Dissolve. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, M. 2002. The Constituent Foundations of the Rally-Round-the-Flag Phenomenon. International Studies Quarterly 46(2): 263–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bigo, D. 1994. The European Internal Security Field: Stakes and Rivalries in a Newly Developing Area of Police Intervention. In Policing Across National Boundaries, eds. M. Anderson and M. den Boer, 161–173. London/New York: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001. The Möbius Ribbon of Internal and External Security(ies). In Identities, Borders, Orders: Rethinking International Relations Theory, eds. M. Albert, D. Jacobson, and Y. Lapid, 91–116. Minneapolis/London: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boellstorff, T. 2012. Rethinking Digital Anthropology. In Digital Anthropology, ed. Heather A. Horst, and Daniel Miller, 39–60. London: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, K. 1959. National Images and International Systems. Journal of Conflict Resolution 3(2): 120–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourbeau, P. 2011. The Securitization of Migration: A Study of Movement and Order. London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, K. 2012. ‘What It Was Like to Live Through a Day’: Transitional Justice and the Memory of the Everyday in a Divided Society. International Journal of Transitional Justice. Special Issue: Transitional Justice and the Everyday 7(1): 444–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, P. 1989. History as Social Memory. In Memory: History, Culture and the Mind (Wolfson College Lectures), ed. Thomas Butler. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzan, B. 1993. Societal Security, State Security and Internationalisation. In Identity, Migration and the New Security Agenda in Europe, eds. O. Wæver, B. Buzan, M. Kelstrup, and P. Lemaitre. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzan, B., O. Wæver, and J. de Wilde. 1998. Security. A New Framework For Analysis. Boulder/London: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. 1998. Writing Security. Minnesota, MN: Minnesota University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, T., and D. Reiter. 2004. The United Nations Security Council and the Rally ’Round the Flag Effect. Journal of Conflict Resolution 48(6): 886–909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen, B. 1959. Attitudes Toward Foreign Affairs as a Function of Personality. Oslo: Oslo University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, E.G. 2010. Ethnographic Approaches to Digital Media. Annual Review of Anthropology 39: 487–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cull, N. 2008. The Cold Ear and the United States Information Agency. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dean, M. 1999. Power and Rule in Modern Society. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delovoi Peterburg. 2014, October 28. Тrolli iz Ol’gino pereekhali v novyi chetyrekhetazhnyi ofis na Savushkina, dp.ru. http://www.dp.ru/a/2014/10/27/Borotsja_s_omerzeniem_mo/. Accessed 22 March 2015.

  • DeRouen, K. Jr. 2000. Presidents and the Diversionary Use of Force: A Research Note. International Studies Quarterly 44(2): 317–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diez, T. 2004. Europe’s Others and the Return of Geopolitics. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 17(2): 319–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. Not Quite “Sui Generis” Enough: Interrogating European Values. European Societies 14(4): 522–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diez, T., S. Stetter, and M. Albert. 2006. The European Union and Border Conflicts: The Transformative Power of Integration. International Organization 60(3): 563–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dovidio, J., K. Kawakami, C. Johnson, B. Johnson, and A. Howard. 1997. On the Nature of Prejudice: Automatic and Controlled processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 69: 1013–1027.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duchkowitsch, W. 1990. Judenhetze als Journalistischer Industriezweig. In: Medien Und Zeit. Forum für historische Kommunikationsforschung, 5, Heft 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Efal, A. (2007) Warburg’s “Pathos Formula” in Psychoanalytic and Benjaminian Con-texts. Assaph: Studies in Art History, 5: 221–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson, J., and E. Noreen. 2002. Setting the Agenda of Threats: An Explanatory Model. Uppsala: Department of Peace and Conflict Research, Uppsala University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erll, A., and A. Rigney. 2009. Mediation, Remediation, and the Dynamics of Cultural Memory. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Etkind, A. 2009. Post-Soviet Hauntology: Cultural Memory of the Soviet Terror. Constellations 16(1): 182–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. Warped Mourning: Stories of the Undead in the Land of the Unburied. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fako, E. 2012 Strategies of Desecuritization. MA Thesis at the Central European University, Budapest.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fauser, M. 2006 Transnational Migration–A National Security Risk? Securitization of Migration Policies in Germany, Spain and the United Kingdom (Reports and Analyses 2/06). Warsaw: Center for International Relations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fendt, M., and M. Fanselow. 1999. The Neuroanatomical and Neurochemical Basis for Conditioned Fear. Neuroscience and Behavioural Reviews 23: 743–760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finlay, J., O. Holsti, and R. Fragen. 1967. Enemies in Politics. Chicago: Rand-McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flohr, H. 1987. Biological Bases of Prejudice. International Political Science Review/Revue internationale de science politique 8(2):183–192. (Main Currents in Biopolitics).

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. 1980. The Confession of the Flesh. In Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, ed. C. Gordon, 194–228. Pantheon: New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, B. 2005. Collective Memory and Forgetting Components for a Study of Obituaries. Theory, Culture & Society 22(6): 53–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frei, D. 1985. Feindbilder und Abrüstung. Die gegenseitige Einschätzung der UdSSR und der USA. München: Verlag C. H. Beck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galli, F. (2008) The Legal and Political Implications of the Securitisation of Counter-Terrorism Measures across the Mediterranean. EuroMesco Paper 71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garde-Hansen, J., A. Hoskins, and A. Reading, eds. 2009. Save As… Digital Memories. Basingstoke: PalgraveMacmillian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaufman, E. 2014. Blogging Nation: Russian Race Riots Online. Journal of Print and Media Technology research 3(2): 119–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. Memory, Media and Securitization: Russian Media Framing of the Ukrainian Crisis. Journal of Soviet and Post-Soviet Politics and Society 1(1): 141–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauntlett, D., and R. Horsley. 2004. Web Studies. London: Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilman, S. 1993. The Jew’s body. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilman, S.L. 1999. Making the Body Beautiful: A Cultural History of Aesthetic Surgery. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gudkov, L. (2004) Ideologema «vraga»: «Vragi» kak massovyy sindrom i mekhanizm sotsiokul’turnoy integratsii. Obraz vraga. Moskva: OGI.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. (2005). The fetters of victory: How the war provides Russia with its identity. Osteuropa Web Special. http://www.osteuropa.dgo-online.org/hefte/international/eurozine-en/the-fetters-of-victory/

  • Guzzini, S. 2011. Securitization as a Causal Mechanism. Security Dialogue 42(4–5): 329–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halbwachs, M. 1992. On Collective Memory (trans: Lewis Coser). Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, L. 2006. Security as Practice: Discourse Analysis and the Bosnian War. Milton Park: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. Theorizing the Image for Security Studies. Visual Securitization and the Muhammad Cartoon Crisis. European Journal of International Relations 17(1): 51–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. How Images Make World Politics: International Icons and the Case of Abu Ghraib. Review of International Studies 41(02): 263–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, L., and S. Fiske. 2006. Dehumanizing the Lowest of the Low: Neuroimaging Responses to Extreme Out-Groups. Psychological Science 17: 847–853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann, R., and M. Fischerkeller. 1995. Beyond the Enemy Image and Spiral Model: Cognitive Strategic Research after the Cold War. International Organization 49(3): 415–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, M. 2008. The Generation of Postmemory. Poetics Today 29(1): 103–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holsti, O. 1986. The Belief System and National Images. In Psychology and the Prevention of Nuclear War, ed. R. White, 322–335. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horst, H. A., and Miller, D. (Eds.). 2012. Digital anthropology. London: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoskins, Andrew. 2009. Digital Network Memory. In Mediation, Remediation, and the Dynamics of Cultural Memory, eds. Astrid Erll and Ann Rigney, 91–106. Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huysmans, J. 1998. Desecuritisation and the Aesthetics of Horror in Political Realism. Millennium 27(3): 569–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2000. The European Union and Securitization of Migration. Journal of Common Market Studies 38(5): 751–777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. The Politics of Insecurity: Fear, Migration and Asylum in the Eu. Basingstoke: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huyssen, A. 2003. Present Pasts: Urban Palimpsests and the Politics of Memory. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim, M. 2005. The Securitization of Migration: A Racial Discourse. International migration 43(5): 163–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, R. 2007. Constructing Enemies: ‘Islamic Terrorism’. Political and Academic Discourse. Government and Opposition 42(3): 394–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joffé, G. 2008. The European Union, Democracy and Counter-Terrorism in the Maghreb. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 46(1): 147–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C.D. 2012. Memory, Metaphor, and Aby Warburg’s Atlas of images. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kailitz S., and A. Umland (2010) Why the Fascists Won’t Take Over the Kremlin (for Now). A Comparison of Democracy’s Breakdown and Fascism’s Rise in Weimar Germany and Post-Soviet Russia: Working paper WP14/2010/02. Moscow: Publishing House of the University—Higher School of Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karimova, A. (2012, February 13). Kremlevskaia blogodel’nia. Kommersant. http://www.kommersant.ru/doc/1868022. Accessed 3 February 2013.

  • Keen, S. 1991. Faces of the Enemy: Reflections of the Hostile Imagination. San Francisco: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, A. 2002. An Everyday Magic: Cinema and Cultural Memory. London: IB Tauris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawton, A. (1992). Kinoglasnost: Soviet Cinema in Our Time (No. 9). CUP Archive.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J.R. 1977. Rallying Around the Flag: Foreign Policy Events and Presidential Popularity. Presidential Studies Quarterly 7(4): 252–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leggewie, C. (2009). Schlachtfeld Europa. Transnationale Erinnerung und europäische Identität. Blätter für Deutsche und Internationale Politik 2, 81–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, S. (2011) FRONTEX and the Securitization of Migrants Through Practices. Paper presented at the Migration Working Group Seminar, European University Institute, Florence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Léonard, S., and C. Kaunert. 2011. Reconceptualizing the Audience in Securitization Theory. In Securitization Theory: How Security Problems Emerge and Dissolve, 57–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, S.D., and J.A. List. 2009. Field Experiments in Economics: The Past, the Present, and the Future. European Economic Review 53(1): 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, J.S. 1988. Domestic Politics and War. The Journal of Interdisciplinary History 18(4): 653–673. The Origin and Prevention of Major Wars

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebermann, M., A. Hariri, J. Jarcho, N. Eisenberger, and S. Bookheimer. 2005. An fMRI Investigation of Race-Related Amygdala Activity in African-American and Caucasian-American Individuals. Nature Neuroscience 8: 720–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipsitz, G. 1991. Time Passages: Collective Memory and American Popular Culture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lißmann, H., H. Nicklas, and Ä. Ostermann. 1975. Feindbilder in Schulbüchern. In Friedensanalysen. Für Theorie und Praxis 1: Feindbilder, ed. HSFK, 37–62. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1976. Empirische Ideologiekritik als Beitrag zur Gesellschaftsanalyse. In Friedensanalysen. Für Theorie und Praxis 3, Schwerpunkt: Unterentwicklung, ed. HSFK, 186–196. Frankfurt a. M: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzo-Dus, N., and S. Marsh. 2012. Bridging the Gap: Interdisciplinary Insights into the Securitization of Poverty. Discourse & Society 23(3): 274–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, M. 2008. Securitization and the Construction of Security. European Journal of International Relations 14(4): 563–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McSweeney, B. 1996. Identity and Security: Buzan and the Copenhagen School. Review of International Studies 22: 81–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikhaylova, L. (2012, March 3). Internet as a Battlefield in Russian Elections, The Examiner. http://www.examiner.com/article/internet-as-a-battlefield-russian-elections. Accessed 6 August 2014.

  • Ministry of Communication. (2014). Glava Minkomsviazi Rossii vystupil na meropriatii vysokogo urovnia v ramkakh Genassamblei OON, RF Ministry of Communications and Mass Media official website. http://minsvyaz.ru/ru/news/index.php?id_4=44571. Accessed 11 August 2014.

  • Mink, G., and L. Neumayer. 2007. L’Europe et ses passés douloureux. Paris: La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moloney, K. 2006. Rethinking Public Relations: PR Propaganda and Democracy. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morozov, V. 2009. Obsessed with identity: The IR in Post-Soviet Russia. Journal of International Relations and Development 12(2): 200–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morozov, V., and B. Rumelili. 2012. The External Constitution of European Identity: Russia and Turkey as Europe-Makers. Cooperation and Conflict 47(1): 28–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, T. 2009. Handbook of Prejudice, Stereotyping and Discrimination. New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicklas, Hans, Jörg Becker, Hans-Joachim Lißmann, and Änne Ostermann. 1978. Vorurteile und stereotype Muster in Schulbüchern (1975). In Vorurteil (Wege der Forschung), ed. Anitra Karsten (Hrsg.), 351–374. Darmstadt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicklas, H., and Ä. Ostermann. 1980. Vorurteil. In Handwörterbuch der Psychologie, eds. Roland Asanger and Gerd Wenninger. Beltz Verlag: Weinheim und Basel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nora, P. 1989. Between Memory and History: Les Lieux de Mémoire. Representations, No. 26, Special Issue: Memory and Counter-Memory, pp. 7–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oneal, J., and A.L. Bryan. 1995. The Rally Around the Flag Effect in U.S. Foreign Policy Crises, 1950–1985. Political Behaviour 17(4): 379–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortega Breton, H. 2010. Feeling Persecuted? The Definitive Role of Paranoid Anxiety in the Constitution of “War on Terror” Television. In Discourses and Practices of Terrorism: Interrogating Terror, eds. B. Brecher, M. Devenney, and A. Winter, 93–94. Abingdon: Routledge Critical Terrorism Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, T.M., S.L. Carpenter, C. Sedikides, and F. Li. 1993. Differential Processing of In-Group and Out-Group Information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 64(1): 21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pääbo, H. 2011. Potential of Collective Memory Based International Identity Conflicts in Post-Imperial Space Comparison of Russian Master Narrative with Estonian, Ukrainian and Georgian Master Narratives. Tartu: Tartu University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plous, S. 2003. The Psychology of Prejudice, Stereotyping, and Discrimination. In Understanding Prejudice and Discrimination, ed. Scott Plous. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plugotarenko, S. 2014. Glavnyi analiticheskii doklad agregiruiushchii informatsiiu po sostoianiiu razvitiia Runeta—po itogam proshedshego goda, Rossiiskii internet-forum 2014. http://www.slideshare.net/Dimanius/2014-rif-2014. Accessed 20 July 2015.

  • Pollak, M. 1993. Une identité blessée. Paris: Métailié.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prozorov, S. 2011. The Other as Past and Present: Beyond the Logic of ‘Temporal Othering’ in IR Theory. Review of International Studies 37(03): 1273–1293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radio Svoboda. (2014, October 21). Karikatura dnia na Radio Svoboda. http://www.svoboda.org/content/article/26648017.html. Accessed 15 December 2014.

  • RFERL. (2015, April 4). Russian Trolls’ Vast Library of Insulting Images. http://www.rferl.org/content/russian-trolls-vast-insult-cartoon-database/26938435.html. Accessed 20 July 2015.

  • Rieber, R., ed. 1991. The Psychology of War and Peace. The Image of the Enemy. NY and London: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roe, P. 2008. Actor, Audience(s) and Emergency Measures: Securitization and the UK’s Decision to Invade Iraq. Security Dialogue 39(6): 615–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rolston, B. 2010. ‘Trying to Reach the Future Through the Past’: Murals and Memory in Northern Ireland. Crime Media Culture 6(3): 285–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rumelili, B. 2004. Constructing Identity and Relating to Difference: Understanding the EU’s Mode of Differentiation. Review of International Studies 30(01): 27–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutten, E., J. Fedor, and V. Zvereva, eds. 2013. Memory, Conflict and New Media. Web Wars in Post-Socialist States. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salter, M. B. 2011. When Securitization Fails: The Hard Case of Counter-Terrorism Programs. Securitization Theory: How Security Problems Emerge and Dissolve, 116–131. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Satjukow, S. and R. Gries (Hrsg). 2004. Unsere Feinde. Konstruktion des anderen im Sozialismus. Leipzig: Leipziger Universitätsverlag GmBH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schäfer, B. and B. Six. 1978. Sozialpsychologie der Vorurteils. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, Urban Taschenbuch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrage, E. 2012. Von Ketzern und Terroristen? Zum analytischen Nutzen eines unterdisziplinären Feindbildbegriffs. In: Fürst, Alfons, Harutyun Harutyunyan, Eva-Maria Schrage, Verena Voigt (Hg.)(2012) Von Ketzern und Terroristen. Interdisziplinäre Studien zur Konstruktion und Rezeption von Feindbildern. Münster: Aschendorff Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senghaas, D. 1969. Abschreckung und Frieden. Studien zur Kritik organisierter Friedlosigkeit. Frankfurt am Main: Europäische Verlagsanstalt.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1972. Zur Analyse von Drohpolitik in den internationalen Beziehungen. In Friedensforschung und Politische Praxis. Jahrbuch für Friedens- und Konfliktforschung, Band II, ed. Dieter Senghaas. Düsseldorf: Bertelsmann-Universitätsverlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverstein, B. 1987. The Enemy Image. In Psychology Colloquium, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ (Vol. 16).

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1989. Enemy Images: The Psychology of US Attitudes and Cognitions Regarding Soviet the Union. American Psychologist 44(6): 903–913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sjöstedt, R. 2010. Talking Threats. The Social Construction of National Security in Russia and the United States. PhD diss., Uppsala University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smirnov, S., A. Artem’ev and G. Tumanov, (2012) ‘Obvinit’ nas nikto ni v chem ne smozhet, Gazeta.ru, 8 February 2012. http://www.gazeta.ru/politics/2012/02/08_a_3993349.shtml. Accessed 3 February 2014.

  • Smith, A. 1996. Diversionary Foreign Policy in Democratic Systems. International Studies Quarterly 40(1): 133–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, A. 1995. Warriors of Disinformation: American Propaganda, Soviet Lies and the Winning of the Cold War. New York: Arcade Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stangor, C. 2009. The Study of Stereotyping, Prejudice, and Discrimination Within Social Psychology. In Handbook of Prejudice, Stereotyping and Discrimination, ed. Todd Nelson. New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephan, W., L. Renfro, and M. Davis. 2008. The Role of Threat in Intergroup Relations. In Improving Intergroup Relations: Building on the Legacy of Thomas F. Pettigrew, eds. Ulrich Wagner, Linda Tropp, Gillian Finchilescu, and Colin Tredoux, 55–72. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stephan, W., O. Ybarra and K. Morrison. 2009. Intergroup Threat Theory. In: Nelson, Todd (2009) Handbook of Prejudice, Stereotyping and Discrimination. New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, D., ed. 2004. The Historiography of the Holocaust. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taureck, R. 2006. Securitisation Theory and Securitisation Studies. Journal of International Relations and Development 9: 53–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, R. 1999. Singing on the Steppes for Stalin: Ivan Pyr’ev and the Kolkhoz Musical in Soviet Cinema. Slavic Review 58(1): 143–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijck, J. 2007. Mediated Memories in the Digital Age. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermeulen, P., S. Craps, R. Crownshaw, O. de Graef, A. Huyssen, V. Liska and D. Miller (2012) Dispersal and Redemption: The Future Dynamics of Memory Studies—A Roundtable. Memory Studies 5,2 (2012), 233-239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vilmar, F. 1971. Systematischer Entwurf zur kritischen Friedensforschung. In: Senghaas, Dieter (Hrsg) Kritische Friedensforschung, Frankfurt a. M.: Edition Suhrkamp volume 478, 362–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vultee, F. 2011. Securitization as a Media Frame. In Securitization Theory: How Security Problems Emerge and Dissolve, ed. T. Balzacq, 77–93. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vuori, J.A. 2014. Critical Security and Chinese Politics: The Anti-Falungong Campaign. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wæver, O. 2000. The EU as a Security Actor: Reflections from a Pessimistic Constructivist on Post-Sovereign Security Orders. In International Relations Theory and the Politics of European Integration: Power, Security, and Community, eds. Morten Kelstrup and Michael Williams, 250–294. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wæver, O. 2003. Securitization: Taking Stock of a Research Programme. Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wæver O. 2004 Aberystwyth, Paris, Copenhagen. New ‘Schools’ in Security Theory and Their Origins Between Core and Periphery. Paper presented at International Studies Association Annual Conference, Montreal, 17-20 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warburg, A. 1939. A Lecture on Serpent Ritual. Journal of the Warburg Institute 2(4): 277–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weller, C. 2001. Feindbilder: Ansätze und Probleme ihrer Forschung. Bremen: InIIS-Arbeitspapier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M. 2003. Words, Images, Enemies: Securitization and International Politics. International Studies Quarterly 47(4): 511–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winter, J. 2006. Remembering War: The Great War Between Memory and History in the 20th Century. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuval-Davis, N. 1997. Women, Citizenship and Difference. Feminist Review: 4–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhurzhenko, T. 2007. The Geopolitics of Memory. Eurozine Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zoll, R., E. Lippert, and T. Rössler. 1977. Bundeswehr und Gesellschaft, ein Wörterbuch, 90–94. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gaufman, E. (2017). Defining Securitization, Enemy Images, and Memory. In: Security Threats and Public Perception. New Security Challenges. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43201-4_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics