Skip to main content

Multidisciplinary Approach to Treatment: An Australian Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sarcoma

Abstract

Optimal treatment for sarcoma requires knowledge of a large, continually changing body of literature that contains significant contributions from multiple specialties. The rarity of sarcoma and its subtypes makes it challenging to determine optimal treatment strategies. Multidisciplinary input, including specialist pathology and radiology expertise, is essential to providing best clinical practice outcomes. However, there are significant gaps in the evidence base used to underpin clinical decision making for patients with sarcoma and significant geographic and institutional treatment disparities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Potter JA, Woods R, Bessen T, Farshid G, Roder D, Neuhaus SJ. Incidence and reconstructive demand of sarcoma in Australia: first national data analysis. In: Royal Australasian College of Surgeons Annual Scientific Congress, Singapore May 2014. Abstract 21859.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ruhstaller T, Roe T, Thurlimann B, Nicoll JJ. The multi-disciplinary meeting: an indispensable aid to communication between different specialities. Eur J Cancer. 2006;42:2459–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Zorbas H, Barraclough B, Rainbird K, et al. Multidisciplinary care for women with breast cancer in the Australian context: what does it mean? Med J Aust. 2003;179(10):528–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. NSW Cancer Plan 2011–15 Cancer Institute NSW, Sydney, November 2010. www.cancerinstitute.org.au/publications Accessed 30 June 2014.

  5. The Cancer Council South Australia and South Australian Department of Health. Statewide cancer control plan 2011-2015. 2011 Government of South Australia, Adelaide. http://wwwsahealthsagovau/wps/wcm/connect/public+content/sa+health+internet/clinical+resources/clinical+topics/cancer+and+oncology/state-wide+cancer+control+plan+2011+2015. Accessed 30 June 2014.

  6. Metropolitan Health and Aged Care Services Division. Achieving best practice cancer care—a guide for implementing multidisciplinary care. Victorian Government Department of Human Services, Melbourne, Victoria. 2007. http://wwwgicscomau/resources/multidisciplinarypolicy0702pdf. Accessed 30 June 2014.

  7. Department of Health, Western Australia. WA Cancer Plan 2012-2017. Perth: WA Cancer & Palliative Care Network, Department of Health, Western Australia. 2011. http://wwwhealthnetworkshealthwagovau/cancer/docs/12196_WA_Cancer_PLANpdf. Accessed 30 June 2014.

  8. Sidhom MA, Poulsen MG. Multidisciplinary care in oncology: medicolegal implications of group decisions. Lancet Oncol. 2006;7:951–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Thomas D, Whyte S, Choong PFM. Australian Sarcoma Study Group: development and outlook. Cancer Forum. 2009;33(1):25–8.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cancer Australia [monograph on the internet]. Support for clinical trials. http://www.canceraustralia.gov.au/cancer-australia/research-and-clinical-trials/support-clinical-trials. Accessed 30 June 2014.

  11. White S, Gatenby S. Sarcoma capability audit: a register of centres of excellence. Cancer Forum 2010 Reports. http://wwwcancerforumorgau/issues/2010/july/reports/sarcoma_capability_audithtm#1. Accessed 30 June 2014.

  12. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Australian demographic statistics. December 2013. http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/3101.0. Accessed 30 June 2014.

  13. Population centralization. The Australian Way. http://blog.rpdata.com/2012/04/population-centralizationthe-australian-way/. Accessed 2 Jun 2014.

  14. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, 2006. Improving outcomes for people with sarcoma. NICE guidance on cancer services. http://wwwniceorguk/guidance/CSGSARCOMA. Accessed 30 June 2014.

  15. Why multi-disciplinary care is important in sarcomas. Australasian Sarcoma Study Group. http://www.australiansarcomagroup.org/multi-disciplinary-care.html. Accessed 30 June 2014.

  16. Bleyer A, Montello M, Budd T, Saxman S. National survival trends of young adults with sarcoma: lack of progress is associated with lack of clinical trial participation. Cancer. 2005;103:1891–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Metropolitan Health and Aged Care Services Division. Achieving best practice cancer care—a guide for implementing multidisciplinary care. Melbourne, Victoria: Victorian Government Department of Human Services; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cancer Co ordination Unit. Multidisciplinary Meeting Toolkit. Melbourne, Victoria: Victorian Department of Human Services; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ruhstaller T, Roe H, Thürlimann B, Nicoll JJ. The multidisciplinary meeting: an indispensable aid to communication between different specialities. Eur J Cancer. 2006;42(15):2459–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Biogrid Australia (Internet). Homepage. http://www.biogrid.org.au/wps/portal. Accessed 30 June 2014.

  21. Clark MA, Fisher C, Judson I, Thomas JM. Soft-tissue sarcomas in adults. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:701–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cancer Clinical Practice Guidelines. Management of adult onset sarcoma 2013. http://www.wiki.cancer.org.au/australia/Guidelines:Sarcoma. Accessed 30 June 2014.

  23. Olver I, Von Dinklage J. It is time for clinical guidelines to enter the digital age. Med J Aust. 2013;199(9):569–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kerfoot BP, Kearney MC, Connelly D, Ritchey ML. Interactive spaced education to assess and improve knowledge of clinical practice guidelines: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2009;249:744–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Central Intelligence Agency. The World Factbook. March 2014. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2004rank.html. Accessed 2 June 2014.

  26. Lewin J, Puri A, Quek R, Wood D, Alcasabas A, Ngan R, Thomas DM. A consensus statement on resource-stratified management of sarcoma in the Asia-Pacific region. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:e562–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Australasian Sarcoma Study Group

Cancer Council Australia

Dr. Raghu Gowda and Ms. Sonya Stephens for their assistance and provision of data from the SA/NT MDT.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susan J. Neuhaus MD, MBBS, PhD, FRACS .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Neuhaus, S.J., Thomas, D.M. (2017). Multidisciplinary Approach to Treatment: An Australian Perspective. In: Henshaw, R. (eds) Sarcoma. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43121-5_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43121-5_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-43119-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-43121-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics