Advertisement

Mathematics Learning Through Play: Educators’ Journeys

  • Bryndís GarðarsdóttirEmail author
  • Guðbjörg Pálsdóttir
  • Johanna Einarsdóttir
Chapter
Part of the International Perspectives on Early Childhood Education and Development book series (CHILD, volume 16)

Abstract

This chapter describes a collaborative action research project that was conducted in one preschool and one primary school in Iceland, investigating approaches to pedagogical continuity across the transition from preschool to school. The participants were one teacher from each school level, who collaborated with the researchers. Data were gathered using interviews and notes from meetings. The teachers agreed upon using play with building blocks to create continuity in children’s learning. In this chapter, we report on the way the teachers’ ideas about mathematics and play evolved during their participation in the research. The implication of this study is that the teachers experienced a dilemma in the tension between the free play and the teaching of mathematical concepts. They were concerned about the ownership of the play and their own involvement as teachers. Further, they needed support to realise the mathematical concepts that they could expect the children to work on. Their participation in this research project empowered the teachers and influenced their practices and ideas around pedagogical continuity.

References

  1. Bennett, N., Wood, L., & Rogers, S. (1997). Teaching through play: Teachers’ thinking and classroom practice. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Boaler, J. (2005). Connecting mathematical ideas. Portsmouth: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  3. Bruce, C. D., Flynn, T., & Stagg-Peterson, S. (2011). Examining what we mean by collaborative action research: A cross-case analysis. Educational Action Research, 19(4), 433–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carr, M. (2001). Assessment in early childhood settings: Learning stories. London: Paul Chapman.Google Scholar
  5. Copley, J. V. (2010). The young child and mathematics. Washington, DC: National Association of the Education of Young Children.Google Scholar
  6. Darling-Hammond, L. (1998). Teacher learning that supports student learning. Educational Leadership, 55(5), 6–11.Google Scholar
  7. Doverborg, E., & Pramling, I. (2006). Varför skall barn inte märka att de lär seg matematik? [Why shall children not notice that they are learning Math?]. In G. Emanuelsson & E. Doverborg (Eds.), Matematik i förskolan, Nämnaren TEMA (pp. 49–52). Gautaborg: Nationelt Centrum för Matematikutbildning, NCM.Google Scholar
  8. Einarsdóttir, J. (2007). Lítil börn með skólatöskur. Tengsl leikskóla og grunnskóla [Small children with schoolbags. Transition from preschool to primary school]. Reykjavík: Háskólaút-gáfan og Rannsóknarstofa í menntunarfræðum ungra barna (RannUng).Google Scholar
  9. Einarsdóttir, J. (2010). Connecting curricula through action research. In H. Müller (Ed.), Transition from pre-school to school: Emphasizing early literacy (pp. 57–62). Köln: EU-Agency, Regional Government of Cologne/Germany. http://www.ease-eu.com/documents/compendium/compendium.pdf. Accessed 30 Sept 2014.
  10. Einarsdóttir, J. (2014). Play and literacy: A collaborative action research in preschool. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 58(1), 93–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fösker, L. I. R. (2012). Grip rommet! [Use the space!]. In T. Fosse (Ed.), Rom for matematikk – i barnehagen. Bergen: Caspar forlag.Google Scholar
  12. Grevholm, B. (2006). Matematikdidaktikens möjligheter i en forskningsbaserat lärarutbildning. [Mathematics education in a research-based teacher education]. In S. Ongstad (Ed.), Fag og didaktik i lærerutdanning: kunnskap i grenseland (pp. 183–206). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
  13. Grieshaber, S., & McArdle, F. (2010). The trouble with play. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Griffiths, M. (1998). Educational research for social justice: Getting off the fence. Philadelphia: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Hammerness, K., Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (2005). How teachers learn and develop. In L. Darling- Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 358–389). San Francisco: Jossey–Bass.Google Scholar
  16. Jaworski, B., & Wood, T. (Eds.). (2008). The mathematics teacher educator as a developing professional. Rotterdam: Sense.Google Scholar
  17. Jordan, B. (2004). Scaffolding learning and co-constructing understandings. In A. Anning, J. Cullen, & M. Fleer (Eds.), Early childhood education. Society and culture (pp. 31–42). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. Karlsdóttir, K., & Garðarsdóttir, B. (2008). Learning stories: Children’s competence and skills. In J. Einarsdóttir & B. Garðarsdóttir (Eds.), Sjónarmið barna og lýðræði í leikskólastarfi [Children’s views and democracy in preschool] (pp.133–153). Reykjavík: Háskólaútgáfan og Rannsóknarstofa í menntunarfræðum ungra barna (RannUng).Google Scholar
  19. Kemmis, S. (2006). Participatory action research and the public sphere. Educational Action Research, 14(4), 459–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (1988). The action research planner (3rd ed.). Geelong: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Kristjánsdóttir, A. (2008). Matematikk [Mathematics]. In E. M. Halvorsen (Ed.), Didaktikk for grunnskolen: Fellestrekk og særdrag i et fagdidaktisk mangfold (pp. 147–174). Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.Google Scholar
  22. McLachlan, C., Fleer, M., & Edwards, S. (2011). Early childhood curriculum. Planning, assessment and implementation. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. McNiff, J., & Whitehead, J. (2010). Action research: Principles and practice. London: Routledge/Falmer.Google Scholar
  24. McNiff, J., Lomax, P., & Whitehead, J. (2003). You and your action research project (2nd ed.). London: Routledge/Falmer.Google Scholar
  25. Ministry of Education, Science and Culture. (2011). Aðalnámskrá leikskóla [The Icelandic national curriculum guide for preschool]. Reykjavík: Menntaog menningarmálaráðuneytið.Google Scholar
  26. Ministry of Education, Science and Culture. (2013). Aðalnámskrá grunnskóla [The Icelandic national curriculum guide for compulsory school]. Reykjvík: Menntaog menningar-málaráðuneytið.Google Scholar
  27. National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC). (2010). Early childhood mathematics: Promoting good beginnings. A joint statement of the National Association for the Education of Young Children and the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Retrieved from: http://www.naeyc.org/positionstatements/mathematics. Accessed 20 Apr 2015.
  28. Perry, B., Dockett, S., & Harley, E. (2012). The Early years learning framework for Australia and the Australian curriculum – Mathematics: Linking educators’ practice through pedagogical inquiry questions. In B. Atweh, M. Goos, R. Jorgensen, & D. Siemon (Eds.), Engaging the Australian curriculum Mathematics: Perspectives from the field (pp. 153–174). Adelaide: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. http://www.merga.net.au/onlinebooks. Accessed 20 Apr 2015.
  29. Pramling Samuelsson, I., & Asplund Carlsson, M. (2008). The playing learning child: Towards a pedagogy of early childhood. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 52(6), 623–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Reikerås, E. (2008). Temahefte – om antall, rom og form i barnehagen [Theme – About number, space and form in pre-school]. Oslo: Kunskapsdepartementet.Google Scholar
  31. Rogers, S. (2011). Play and pedagogy: A conflict of interests? In S. Rogers (Ed.), Rethinking play and pedagogy in early childhood education: Concepts, contexts and culture (pp. 5–18). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundation of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Siraj-Blatchford, I., & Sylva, K. (2004). Researching pedagogy in English preschools. British Educational Research Journal, 30(5), 713–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Townsend, A. (2013). Principled challenges for a participatory discipline. Educational Action Research, 21(3), 326–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wells, G., & Claxton, G. (2002). Learning for life in the 21st. century: Sociocultural perspectives on the future of education. Blackwell: Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wood, E. (2010). Developing integrated pedagogical approaches to play and learning. In P. Broadhead, J. Howard, & E. Wood (Eds.), Play and learning in the early years (pp. 9–26). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  37. Wood, E. (2014). The play pedagogy interface: Contemporary debates. In L. Brooker, M. Blaise, & S. Edwards (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of play and learning in early childhood (pp. 145–156). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wood, E., & Attfield, J. (2005). Play, learning and the early childhood curriculum (2nd ed.). London: Paul Chapman.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yelland, N., Lee, L., O’Rourke, M., & Harrison, C. (2008). Rethinking learning in early childhood education. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bryndís Garðarsdóttir
    • 1
    Email author
  • Guðbjörg Pálsdóttir
    • 1
  • Johanna Einarsdóttir
    • 1
  1. 1.University of IcelandReykjavíkIceland

Personalised recommendations