Advertisement

Contexts of Influence: Australian Approaches to Early Years Curriculum

  • Sue DockettEmail author
  • Bob Perry
  • Jessamy Davies
Chapter
Part of the International Perspectives on Early Childhood Education and Development book series (CHILD, volume 16)

Abstract

The study reported in this chapter has generated new knowledge promoting positive transitions to school through analysing the impact of the Early Years Learning Framework and the Australian Curriculum on transition to school and interrogating current pedagogies of educational transition, to inform the transition to school intentions of the two curricula. The project’s significance is its potential to impact on the transition to school experiences of Australian children and families and, through this, to promote a positive start to school. Research outcomes address the development and implementation of pedagogies of transition at the time of school entry and the impact of the national curricula on these. The project used a mixed-method approach to interrogating policy intentions and implementation at the federal, state, systems and practitioner levels. It used a large number of face-to-face and telephone interviews, as well as a large-scale national survey of practitioners, concerning transition to school. The chapter provides a description of the structure of the overall project and an analysis of the federal level of data generation.

Notes

Acknowledgement

We acknowledge the funding provided for this project by the Australian Research Council Discovery Grant DP130104276, over the period 2013–2016. We extend our appreciation to additional members of the research team – Paige Lee, Emma Kearney and Kathryn Hopps – and to all those who shared their experiences and expertise with us.

References

  1. Alexander, R. (2008). Pedagogy, curriculum and culture. In P. Murphy, K. Hall, & J. Soler (Eds.), Pedagogy and practice: Culture and identities (pp. 3–27). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Alexander, K., & Entwisle, D. (1998). Facilitating the transition to first grade: The nature of transition and research on factors. Elementary School Journal, 98(4), 351–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aubrey, C., & Durmaz, D. (2012). Policy-to-practice contexts for early childhood mathematics in England. International Journal of Early Years Education, 20(1), 59–77. doi: 10.1080/09669760.2012.664475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Australian Children’s Education and Care Quality Authority (ACECQA). (2013). Guide to the national quality standard. http://files.acecqa.gov.au/files/National-Quality-Framework-Resources-Kit/NQF03-Guide-to-NQS-130902.pdf. Accessed 26 Feb 2015.
  5. Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2012). The shape of the Australian Curriculum, Version 4. http://www.acara.edu.au/verve/_resources/the_shape_of_the_australian_curriculum_v4. pdf. Accessed 26 Feb 2015.
  6. Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2014). Australian Curriculum. http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/. Accessed 26 Feb 2015.
  7. Ball, S. J. (1993). What is policy? Texts, trajectories and toolboxes. Discourse, 13(2), 10–17.Google Scholar
  8. Ball, S. J. (2006). Education policy and social class. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Bernstein, B. (1975). Towards a theory of educational transmissions (Vol. 3). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  10. Brennan, M. (2011). National curriculum: A political-educational triangle. Australian Journal of Education, 55(3), 259–280. doi: 10.1177/000494411105500307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brennan, D., & O’Donnell, C. (1986). Caring for Australia’s children. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  12. Connor, J. (2011). Foundations for learning: Relationships between the early years learning framework and the Australian Curriculum an ECA-ACARA paper. Canberra: ECA. http://foundationinquirylearning.global2.vic.edu.au/files/2013/06/ECA_ACARA_Foundations_Paper-2cq59mi.pdf. Accessed 26 Feb 2015.
  13. Council of Australian Governments. (2009). Investing in the early years – A national early childhood development strategy. https://www.coag.gov.au/sites/default/files/national_ECD_strategy.pdf. Accessed 26 Feb 2015.
  14. Davies. J. (2014). Pedagogies of educational transitions: Continuity and change as children start school in rural areas. Unpublished research proposal. Charles Sturt University.Google Scholar
  15. De Lissovoy, N. (2010). Pedagogy in common: Democratic education in the global era. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43(10), 1119–1134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Department of Education Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR). (2009). Belonging, being and becoming: The early years learning framework for Australia. Department of Education Employment and Workplace Relations. https://docs.education.gov.au/system/files/doc/other/belonging_being_and_becoming_the_early_years_learning_framework_for_australia.pdf. Accessed 26 Feb 2015.
  17. Educational Transitions and Change (ETC) Research Group. (2011). Transition to school: Position statement. Albury: RIPPLE, Charles Sturt University. http://www.csu.edu.au/faculty/educat/edu/transitions/publications/Position-Statement.pdf. Accessed 15 Feb 2015.
  18. Elliott, A. (2006). Early childhood education: Pathways to quality and equity for all children. Camberwell: ACER. http://research.acer.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1003&context=aer. Accessed 17 Feb 2015.
  19. Farquhar, S., & White, E. J. (2014). Philosophy and pedagogy of early childhood. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 46(8), 821–832. doi: 10.1080/00131857.2013.783964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Flottman, R., & Page, J. (2012). Getting early childhood onto the reform agenda: An Australian case study. International Journal of Child Care and Education Policy, 6(1), 17–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Foucault, M. (1972). Archaeology of knowledge. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  22. Gable, A., & Lingard, B. (2013). NAPLAN and the performance regime in Australian Schooling: A review of the policy context. St Lucia: The University of Queensland, School of Social Work and Human Services, Social Policy Unit. http://www.uq.edu.au/swahs/Governing%20performance%20NAPLAN%20Policy%20Summary%20for%20upload.pdf. Accessed 13 Feb 2015.
  23. Hall, S. (1997). The work of representation. In S. Hall (Ed.), Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices (pp. 13–64). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. Harvey, W. (2011). Strategies for conducting elite interviews. Qualitative Research, 11(4), 431–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA). (2015). Progress in international reading literacy study. http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/. Accessed 14 Nov 2015.
  26. Jarvie, W. & Mercer, T. (2014). Labor and the coalition: Policy narratives, evidence and ideology in early childhood education and childcare. Paper presented public policy network conference. Canberra, January. http://www.ppnc.com.au/uploads/1/9/6/2/19623627/wendy_jarvie_and_trish_mercer.pdf Accessed 8 Mar 2015.
  27. Lingard, B. (2009). Testing times: The need for new intelligent account abilities for schooling. QTU Professional Magazine, November, 13–19. http://www.qtu.asn.au/files/9113/2780/3358/29-01-2012_1315_170.pdf. Accessed 26 Feb 2015.
  28. Logan, H., Sumsion, J., & Press, F. (2014). Uncovering hidden dimensions of Australian early childhood policy history: Insights from interviews with policy ‘elites’. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal. doi: 10.1098/1350293X.2104.969086.Google Scholar
  29. Masters, G. (2010). NAPLAN and MySchool: Shedding light on a work in progress. Teacher: The National Education Magazine, August, 22–25.Google Scholar
  30. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2001). Starting strong: Early childhood education and care. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  31. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2006). Starting strong II: Early childhood education and care. Executive summary. Paris: OECD. www.oecd.org/newsroom/37425999.pdf. Accessed 15 Feb 2015.
  32. Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). (2015). Programme for international student assessment (PISA). http://www.oecd.org/pisa/aboutpisa/pisafaq.htm. Accessed 14 Nov 2015.
  33. Perry, B., Dockett, S., & Petriwskyj, A. (Eds.). (2014). Transitions to school: International research, policy and practice. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  34. Reid, A. (2009). Is this a revolution? A critical analysis of the Rudd government’s national education agenda. Curriculum Perspectives, 29(3), 113.Google Scholar
  35. Rizvi, F., & Lingard, B. (2010). Globalizing education policy. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Rudd, K., Macklin, J., Roxon, N., & Smith, S. (2007). Labor’s plan for early childhood. http://www.fitkidz.com.au/~fitkidz/images/stories/pdf/early_childhood_policy-alp2007.pdf. Accessed 26 Feb 2015.
  37. Shorten, A. (1996). The legal context of Australian education: An historical exploration. Australia New Zealand Journal of Law Education, 1(1), 2–32.Google Scholar
  38. Siraj-Blatchford, I., Sylva, K., Muttock, S., Gilden, R., & Bell, D. (2002). Researching effective pedagogy in the early years. London: Department for Education and Skills.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Charles Sturt UniversityAlburyAustralia
  2. 2.Research Institue for Professional Practice, Learning and Education (RIPPLE)Charles Sturt UniversityAlburyAustralia

Personalised recommendations