International Perspectives on the Pedagogies of Educational Transitions

  • Nadine BallamEmail author
  • Bob Perry
  • Anders Garpelin
Part of the International Perspectives on Early Childhood Education and Development book series (CHILD, volume 16)


There has been a great deal written recently about children starting school, particularly primary school. All of the stakeholders in these transitions to school have been considered, along with matters of readiness – for the child, family, educators, schools and communities; adjustment and adaptation; continuity and change in curricula and learning; and the opportunities, aspirations, expectations and entitlements encompassed in the transformation of roles involved. As the children move from their prior-to-school experiences – preschool, child care, home, other out-of-home care – to school, they experience many changes. One of these is often a change from a primarily play-based pedagogical approach in the prior-to-school setting to perhaps a more structured, even formal pedagogy in school. But what about the pedagogies of the transitions themselves? Children do not stop learning and teachers do not stop teaching as children are in the process of transition to school. There are pedagogies of transition employed. This book explores these pedagogies through the work of an international alliance of transitions to school researchers from five countries – Iceland, Scotland and Sweden (European) and Australia and New Zealand (Antipodean). This alliance is named Pedagogies of Educational Transitions – POET.


Primary School Intellectual Disability Refugee Child Educational Transition Indigenous Child 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



In order for the POET project to function, funding was required. A large part of this funding, allowing exchange of European POET members, came from the Marie Curie International Research Staff Exchange Scheme FP7, conducted by the European Commission. The funding for the New Zealand members, through the New Zealand-EU International Research Staff Exchange Scheme, was supported by government funding and administered by the Royal Society of New Zealand. A small amount of the funding for the Australian contingent was provided by Charles Sturt University. All of these funding sources are gratefully acknowledged. Individual research project funding from many sources will be acknowledged in the relevant chapters.

The editors would also like to acknowledge all of their POET colleagues who not only wrote chapters for this book but also helped in the reviewing of the manuscript and generally provided encouragement during the difficult times that inevitably occur in the editing of such a complex book. Thank you for providing the opportunity for us to bring your work together and showcase what we have achieved in POET over the last 4 years.

A special vote of gratitude goes to Professor Sue Dockett who not only led the writing of a number of the chapters in the book but also provided great support to the editors through her reviewing of all the chapters and provision of advice on structure and approach.


  1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2015). Literature review of the impact of early childhood education and care on learning and development: Working paper. Canberra: Author.Google Scholar
  2. Brayboy, B. M. J., Gough, H. R., Leonard, B., Roehl, R. F., II, & Solyom, J. A. (2011). Reclaiming scholarship: Critical Indigenous research methodologies. In S. D. Lapan, M. T. Quartaroli, & F. J. Riemer (Eds.), Qualitative research: An introduction to methods and designs (pp. 423–450). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  3. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments in nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (2006). The bioecological model of human development. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology, Vol. 1: Theoretical models of human development (6th ed., pp. 793–828). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  5. Brooker, L. (2002). Starting school: Young children learning cultures. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Brooker, L. (2008). Supporting transitions in the early years. Maidenhead: Open University Press/McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  7. Bulkeley, J., & Fabian, H. (2006). Well-being and belonging during early educational transitions. International Journal of Transitions in Childhood, 2, 18–31.Google Scholar
  8. Carr, M. (2001). Assessment in early childhood settings: Learning stories. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Davies. J. (2014). Pedagogies of educational transitions: Continuity and change as children start school in rural areas. Unpublished research proposal. Charles Sturt University.Google Scholar
  10. Department of Education Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR). (2009). Belonging, being and becoming: The early years learning framework for Australia. Department of Education Employment and Workplace Relations. Accessed 26 Feb 2015.
  11. Dockett, S., & Perry, B. (2004). What makes a successful transition to school? Views of Australian parents and teachers. International Journal of Early Years Education, 12(3), 217–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dockett, S., & Perry, B. (2007). Starting school: Perceptions, expectations and experiences. Sydney: UNSW Press.Google Scholar
  13. Dockett, S., & Perry, B. (2009). Readiness for school: A relational construct. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 34(1), 20–26.Google Scholar
  14. Dockett, S., & Perry, B. (2014a). Continuity of learning: A resource to support effective transition to school and school age care. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Education.Google Scholar
  15. Dockett, S., & Perry, B. (2014b). Research to policy: Transition to School Position Statement. In B. Perry, S. Dockett, & A. Petriwskyj (Eds.), Transitions to school: International research, policy and practice (pp. 277–294). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dockett, S., Petriwskyj, A., & Perry, B. (2014). Theorising transition: Shifts and tensions. In B. Perry, S. Dockett, & A. Petriwskyj (Eds.), Transitions to school: International research, policy and practice (pp. 1–18). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dunlop, A.-W. (2014). Thinking about transitions: One framework or many? Populating the theoretical model over time. In B. Perry, S. Dockett, & A. Petriwskyj (Eds.), Transitions to school: International research, policy and practice (pp. 31–46). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dunlop, A.-W., & Fabian, H. (2002). Conclusions. In H. Fabian & A.-W. Dunlop (Eds.), Transitions in the early years: Debating continuity and progression for children in early education (pp. 146–154). London: Routledge/Falmer.Google Scholar
  19. Educational Transitions and Change (ETC) Research Group. (2011). Transition to school: Position statement. Albury-Wodonga: Research Institute for Professional Practice, Learning and Education, Charles Sturt University. Accessed 9 Aug 2015.
  20. Einarsdóttir, J. (2007). Children’s voices on the transition from preschool to primary school. In A.-W. Dunlop & H. Fabian (Eds.), Informing transitions in the early years: Research, policy and practice (pp. 74–91). Maidenhead: Open University.Google Scholar
  21. Einarsdóttir, J. (2014). Reading of media accounts of transition to school in Iceland. In B. Perry, S. Dockett, & A. Petriwskyj (Eds.), Transitions to school: International research, policy and practice (pp. 21–30). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Elder, G. H., Jr. (1996). Human lives in changing societies: Life course and developmental insights. In R. B. Cairns, G. H. Elder Jr., & E. J. Costello (Eds.), Developmental science (pp. 31–62). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Garpelin, A. (2011). Borderlands, bridges and rites of passage: Understanding children’s learning journeys from preschool into school. Application. Swedish Research Council, VR: Västerås: Mälardalen University.Google Scholar
  24. Garpelin, A. (2014). Transition to school: A rite of passage in life. In B. Perry, S. Dockett, & A. Petriwskyj (Eds.), Transitions to school: International research, policy and practice (pp. 117–128). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Giroux, H. A. (2005). Border crossings (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Graue, E. (2006). The answer is readiness – Now what is the question? Early Education and Development, 17(1), 43–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Graue, E., & Reineke, J. (2014). The relation of research on readiness to research/practice of transitions. In B. Perry, S. Dockett, & A. Petriwskyj (Eds.), Transitions to school: International research, policy and practice (pp. 159–173). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hartley, C., Rogers, P., Smith, J., Peters, S., & Carr, M. (2012). Across the border: A community negotiates the transition from early childhood to primary school. Wellington: NZCER.Google Scholar
  29. Huser, C., Dockett, S., & Perry, B. (2015). Transition to school: Revisiting the bridge metaphor. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal. doi: 10.1080/1350293X.2015.1102414.Google Scholar
  30. Learning and Teaching Scotland. (2005). Let’s talk about pedagogy. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive. Accessed 17 May 2016.
  31. Margetts, K. (2014). Transition and adjustment to school. In B. Perry, S. Dockett, & A. Petriwskyj (Eds.), Transitions to school: International research, policy and practice (pp. 75–87). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nakata, M. (2007). Disciplining the savages: Savaging the disciplines. Canberra: Aboriginal Studies Press.Google Scholar
  33. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2012). Education today 2013: The OECD perspective. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  34. Perry, B., MacDonald, A., & Gervasoni, A. (2015). Mathematics and transition to school: Theoretical frameworks and practical implications. In B. Perry, A. MacDonald, & A. Gervasoni (Eds.), Mathematics and transition to school: International perspectives. Singapore: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Peters, S. (2004). “Crossing the border”: An interpretive study of children making the transition to school. Unpublished PhD thesis. University of Waikato, New Zealand.Google Scholar
  36. Peters, S. (2014). Chasms, bridges and borderlands: A transitions research ‘across the border’ from early childhood education to school in New Zealand. In B. Perry, S. Dockett, & A. Petriwskyj (Eds.), Transitions to school: International research, policy and practice (pp. 105–116). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pihama, L. (2010). Kaupapa Māori theory: Transforming theory in Aotearoa. He Pukenga Kōrero: A Journal of Māori Studies, 9(2), 5–14.Google Scholar
  38. Siraj-Blatchford, I., Sylva, K., Muttock, S., Gilden, R., & Bell, D. (2002). Researching effective pedagogy in the early years. London: Department for Education and Skills.Google Scholar
  39. United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). (2012). The state of the world’s children: Children in an urban world. New York: UNICEF.Google Scholar
  40. van Gennep, A. (1960). The rites of passage (B.V. Minika & G. L. Caffee, Trans.). London: Routledge/Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  41. Woodhead, M., & Brooker, L. (2008). A sense of belonging. Early Childhood Matters, 111, 3–6.Google Scholar
  42. Woodhead, M., & Moss, P. (2007). Early childhood and primary education: Transitions in the lives of young children. Milton Keynes: The Open University.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of WaikatoHamiltonNew Zealand
  2. 2.Research Institue for Professional Practice, Learning and Education (RIPPLE)Charles Sturt UniversityAlburyAustralia
  3. 3.Mälardalen UniversityVästeråsSweden

Personalised recommendations