Skip to main content

An Empirical Analysis of the Coherence Between Fuzzy Rating Scale- and Likert Scale-Based Responses to Questionnaires

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 456))

Abstract

In dealing with questionnaires concerning satisfaction , quality perception , attitude, judgement , etc., the fuzzy rating scale has been introduced as a flexible way to respond to questionnaires’ items. Designs for this type of questionnaires are often based on Likert scales. This paper aims to examine three different real-life examples in which respondents have been allowed to doubly answer: in accordance with either a fuzzy rating scale or a Likert one. By considering a minimum distance-based criterion, each of the fuzzy rating scale answers is associated with one of the Likert scale labels. The percentages of coincidences between the two responses in the double answer are computed by the criterion-based association. Some empirical conclusions are drawn from the computation of such percentages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. De la Rosa de Sáa S, Gil MA, González-Rodríguez G, López MT, Lubiano MA (2015) Fuzzy rating scale-based questionnaires and their statistical analysis. IEEE T Fuzzy Syst 23:111–126

    Google Scholar 

  2. Diamond P, Kloeden P (1999) Metric spaces of fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 100:63–71

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Gil MA, Lubiano MA, De la Rosa de Sáa S, Sinova B (2015) Analyzing data from a fuzzy rating scale-based questionnaire. A case study. Psicothema 27:182–191

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hesketh T, Hesketh B (1994) Computerized fuzzy ratings: the concept of a fuzzy class. Behav Res Meth Ins C 26:272–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hesketh T, Pryor R, Hesketh B (1988) An application of a computerized fuzzy graphic rating scale to the psychological measurement of individual differences. Int J Man-Mach Stud 29:21–35

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Lubiano MA, De la Rosa de Sáa S, Montenegro M, Sinova B, Gil MA (2016) Descriptive analysis of responses to items in questionnaires. Why not using a fuzzy rating scale? Inform Sci 360:131–148

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lubiano MA, Montenegro M, Sinova B, De la Rosa de Sáa S, Gil MA (2016) Hypothesis testing for means in connection with fuzzy rating scale-based data: algorithms and applications. Eur J Oper Res 251:918–929

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Authors are grateful to Colegio San Ignacio in Oviedo-Asturias (Spain) for allowing us to collect the data in the real-life example. The research in this paper has been partially supported by/benefited from Principality of Asturias Grants GRUPIN14-101 and Severo Ochoa BP12012 (De la Rosa de Sáa), and the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness Grants MTM2015-63971-P and MTM2013-44212-P. Their financial support is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonia Salas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lubiano, M.A., Salas, A., De la Rosa de Sáa, S., Montenegro, M., Gil, M.Á. (2017). An Empirical Analysis of the Coherence Between Fuzzy Rating Scale- and Likert Scale-Based Responses to Questionnaires. In: Ferraro, M., et al. Soft Methods for Data Science. SMPS 2016. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 456. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42972-4_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42972-4_41

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-42971-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-42972-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics