Skip to main content

Part III: Theoretical Perspectives

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 201 Accesses

Abstract

Three perspectives on the end of the GDR are considered. A.O. Hirschman’s exit, voice, and loyalty model of the options to organizational decline/failure; Pierre Bourdieu’s model of the distribution of power and capital in the field and habitus of society; and Erving Goffman’s discussion of stigma. Hirschman’s model explains how the Turn meant that the “exit” option allowed only for emigration, the “voice” option was eliminated by the 1990 vote in favor of unification, and East Germans no longer could legitimately express “loyalty” to the GDR, because it implied revanchist sentiment. Bourdieu’s and Goffman’s models explain why the GDR Academy of Sciences was closed and East German universities vetted; the consequence of these two actions was the dismissal of more than 60 percent of all GDR intellectuals who had worked at these institutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Berdahl, Daphne. 1999. Where the World Ended: Reunification and Identity in the German Borderland. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binder, David. 1990. Evolution in Europe; East Germany’s ‘Utopian Socialist’ Theology. New York Times, May 18. http://www.nytimes.com/1990/05/18/world/evolution-in-europe-east-germany-s-utopian-socialist-theology.html.

  • Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1980. The Logic of Practice. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1987. In Other Words: Essays Toward a Reflexive Sociology. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power. Trans. Gino Raymond and Matthew Adamson. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre, and Loïc J.D. Wacquant. 1992. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre, and Loci Wacquant. 2001. New Liberal Speak: Notes on the New Planetary Vulgate. Radical Philosophy, January/February, pp. 2–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burawoy, Michael. 2012. The Roots of Domination: Beyond Bourdieu and Gramsci. Sociology 46(2): 187–206. http://burawoy.berkeley.edu/Marxism/Roots%20of%20Domination.Sociology.pdf.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coser, Lewis. 1974. Greedy Institutions: Patterns of Undivided Commitment. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, Mary. 1966. Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, Emil. 1964. The Rules of Sociological Method. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foote, Nelson N. 1951. Identification as the Basis for a Theory of Motivation. American Sociological Review 16: 14–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, Francis. 1989. The End of History? The National Interest, Summer.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1992. The End of History and the Last Man Standing. New York: Avon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerken, Heather K. 2013. Exit, Voice, and Disloyalty: The Brainerd Currie Memorial Lecture. Duke Law Review 62: 1349–1386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, Erving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, Erving. 1965. Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, John. 1998. False Dawn: The Delusions of Global Capitalism. London: Granata Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groen, Adriaan in’t. 2013. Jenseits der Utopie Ostprofessoren der Humboldt-Universität und der Prozess der deutschen Einigung. Berlin: Metropol-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Edward T. 1959. The Silent Language. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, Albert O. 1970. Exit, Voice and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, Albert. 1993. Exit, Voice and the Fate of the German Democratic Republic: An Essay in Conceptual History. World Politics 45(2 January): 173–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, Anthony. 2005. The Habitus Process: A Sociological Conception. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior 35(4): 463–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C. Wright. 1940. Situated Actions and Vocabularies of Motive. American Sociological Review 5(6): 904–913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, Billy. 2015. Germany Is Not a Model for Europe—It Fails Abroad and at Home. Billy Blog, March 2. http://bilbo.economicoutlook.net/blog/?p=30317.

  • Richard Wolff. 2015. Scapegoat Economics 2015. RDWolff.com, April 11. http://rdwolff.com/content/scapegoat-economics-2015.

  • RT News. 2015. 20% of Germans Want Revolution, Majority Say Democracy ‘Isn’t Real’—Study. Russian Television News, February 24. http://rt.com/news/234939-germans-want-revolution-report/.

  • Stanley, Timothy, and Alexander Lee. 2014. It’s Still Not the End of History. The Atlantic, September 1. http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2014/09/its-still-not-the-end-of-history-francis-fukuyama/379394/.

  • Suddeutsche Zeitung. 2010. “Ossi”-Streit endet mit Vergleich. Suddeutsche Zeitung, 17 Oktober.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torpey, John C. 1995. Intellectuals, Socialism, and Dissent: The East German Opposition and Its Legacy. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wacquant, Locï. 1989. For a Socio-analysis of Intellectuals: On Homo Academicus. An Interview with Pierre Bourdieu. In Berkeley Journal of Sociology, Vol. 34, Symposium on the Foundations of Radical Social Science (1989), 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. Putting Habitus in Its Place: Rejoinder to the Symposium. Body & Society 20(2): 118–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Robin. 1983. Sociological Tropes: A Tribute to Erving Goffman. Theory, Culture & Society 2(1): 99–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wrong, Dennis. 1961. The Oversocialized Conception of Man in Modern Sociology. American Sociological Review 26(2): 183–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bednarz, D. (2017). Part III: Theoretical Perspectives. In: East German Intellectuals and the Unification of Germany. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42951-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42951-9_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-42950-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-42951-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics