Household Adaptation Strategies to Climate Extremes Impacts and Population Dynamics: Case Study from the Czech Republic
This chapter deals with the state of household adaptation strategies in a region frequently affected by climate extremes, specifically floods occurred from 1997 to 2012 in selected rural municipalities in the Bečva river basin in the North-Eastern part of the Czech Republic. We used quantitative methods, based on a survey of 605 households to find out ways of adaptation measures of household members, including potential for migration. The first, we found increased intensity and frequency of the impacts of climate extremes in the form of floods over the last two decades. Further, we recognized various responses to these extreme events applied by household, mainly some adaptation strategies outside houses, although our findings showed that households tend to repair damage instead of implementing costly adaptation measures. Our research also revealed that migration due to climate extremes did not play a significant role as an adaptation measure in the researched area, people moved out only in a few cases. In addition, our research showed a link between difficulty to migrate and some social consequences, meaning that the increasing occurrence of floods is a fairly serious problem for residents who cannot leave, even if they want to, because they had limited opportunities for resettlement. Nevertheless, we recognized commuting for work as a population dynamics adaptation strategy.
KeywordsClimate extremes impacts Floods Adaptation measures Czech Republic Population dynamics
We would like to express our gratitude to the respondents who shared their information and the interviewers who patiently collected their answers.
- ArcČR 500 Digital Database. (2015). ArcData Praha. http://www.arcdata.cz/produkty-a-sluzby/geograficka-data/arccr-500/. Accessed 16 Apr 2015.
- Black, R., Bennett, S. R. G., Thomas, S. M., & Beddington, J. R. (2011). Migration as adaptation. Nature, 478, 447–479.Google Scholar
- CHMI. (2013). Evaluation of the most serious floods in the Czech Republic: 1997, 2002, 2006, 2009, 2010, 2013. http://voda.chmi.cz/pov/index.html. Accessed 16 Apr 2015.
- DIBAVOD Digital Database. (2015). T. G. Masaryk Water Research Institute. http://www.dibavod.cz/. Accessed 16 Apr 2015.
- Duží, B., Vikhrov, D., Kelman, I., Stojanov, R. & Jakubínský, J. (2015a). Household flood risk reduction in the Czech Republic. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 20(4), 499–504.Google Scholar
- EEA. (2012). Climate change. impacts and vulnerability in Europe 2012. EEA report No. 12. Copenhagen. 2012.Google Scholar
- EM-DAT – International Disaster Database. (2015). Centre for research on the epidemiology of disasters. http://www.emdat.be/database/. Accessed 16 Apr 2015
- Fordham, M. (1999). Participatory planning for flood mitigation: Models and approaches. Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 13(4), 27–34.Google Scholar
- Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2012). Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation (A special report of Working Groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.Google Scholar
- Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2014). Summary for policymakers. In Climate change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Kreibich, H., Thieken, A. H., Petrow, T., Müller, M. & Merz, B. (2005). Flood loss reduction of private households due to building precautionary measures – lessons learned from the Elbe flood in August 2002. Natural Hazard and Earth System Sciences, 5(1), 117–126.Google Scholar
- Kreibich, H., Seifert, I., Thieken, A. H., Lindquist, E., Wagner, W. & Merz, B. (2011). Recent changes in flood preparedness of private households and business in Germany. Regional Environmental Change, 11(1), 59–71.Google Scholar
- McCarthy, J. J., et al. (2001). Climate change 2001. Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability (Contribution of Working Group II to the third assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Reid, H., Alam, M., Berger, R., Cannon, T., Huq, S. & Milligan, A. (2009). Participatory learning and action: Community-based adaptation to climate change. London: International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED).Google Scholar
- Stojanov, R., Kelman, I., Shen, S., Duží, B., Upadhyay, H., Vikhrov, D., Lingraj, G. J., & Mishra, A. (2014a). Contextualising typologies of environmentally induced population movement. Disaster Prevention and Management, 23(5), 508–523.Google Scholar
- Stojanov, R., Kelman, I., Martin, M., Vikhrov, D., Kniveton, D., & Duží, B. (2014b). Migration as adaptation? Population dynamics in the age of climate variability. Brno: Global Change Research Centre, Academy of the Sciences of the Czech Republic.Google Scholar
- Vaishar, A., Hrádek, M., Kallabová, E., Kirchner, K., Klímová, A., Klusáček, P., Kolibová, B., Lacina, J., Munzar, J., Střítežská, Š. & Ondráček, S. (2002). Krajina. lidé a povodně v povodí řeky Moravy: regionálně geografická studie. Brno: Regiograph. 131 p.Google Scholar
- Vikhrov, D., Stojanov, R., Duží, B. & Juřička, D. (2014). Commuting patterns of Czech households exposed to flood risk from the Becva river. Environmental Hazards, 13(1), 58–72.Google Scholar