Household Adaptation Strategies to Climate Extremes Impacts and Population Dynamics: Case Study from the Czech Republic

  • Robert StojanovEmail author
  • Barbora Duží
  • Ilan Kelman
  • Daniel Němec
  • David Procházka
Part of the Global Migration Issues book series (IOMS, volume 6)


This chapter deals with the state of household adaptation strategies in a region frequently affected by climate extremes, specifically floods occurred from 1997 to 2012 in selected rural municipalities in the Bečva river basin in the North-Eastern part of the Czech Republic. We used quantitative methods, based on a survey of 605 households to find out ways of adaptation measures of household members, including potential for migration. The first, we found increased intensity and frequency of the impacts of climate extremes in the form of floods over the last two decades. Further, we recognized various responses to these extreme events applied by household, mainly some adaptation strategies outside houses, although our findings showed that households tend to repair damage instead of implementing costly adaptation measures. Our research also revealed that migration due to climate extremes did not play a significant role as an adaptation measure in the researched area, people moved out only in a few cases. In addition, our research showed a link between difficulty to migrate and some social consequences, meaning that the increasing occurrence of floods is a fairly serious problem for residents who cannot leave, even if they want to, because they had limited opportunities for resettlement. Nevertheless, we recognized commuting for work as a population dynamics adaptation strategy.


Climate extremes impacts Floods Adaptation measures Czech Republic Population dynamics 



We would like to express our gratitude to the respondents who shared their information and the interviewers who patiently collected their answers.


  1. ArcČR 500 Digital Database. (2015). ArcData Praha. Accessed 16 Apr 2015.
  2. Bardsley, D. K., & Hugo, G. J. (2010). Migration and climate change: Examining thresholds of change to guide effective adaptation decision-making. Population and Environment, 32(2–3), 238–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Black, R., Bennett, S. R. G., Thomas, S. M., & Beddington, J. R. (2011). Migration as adaptation. Nature, 478, 447–479.Google Scholar
  4. Botzen, W. J. W., Aerts, J. C. J. H., & van den Bergh, J. C. J. (2013). Individual preferences for reducing flood risk to near zero through elevation. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 18(2), 229–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. CHMI. (2013). Evaluation of the most serious floods in the Czech Republic: 1997, 2002, 2006, 2009, 2010, 2013. Accessed 16 Apr 2015.
  6. DIBAVOD Digital Database. (2015). T. G. Masaryk Water Research Institute. Accessed 16 Apr 2015.
  7. Duží, B., Vikhrov, D., Kelman, I., Stojanov, R. & Jakubínský, J. (2015a). Household flood risk reduction in the Czech Republic. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 20(4), 499–504.Google Scholar
  8. Duží, B., Vikhrov, D., Kelman, I., Stojanov, R. & Juřička, D. (2015b). Household measures for river flood risk reduction in the Czech Republic. Journal of Flood Risk Management. doi: 10.1111/jfr3.12132. online.Google Scholar
  9. EEA. (2012). Climate change. impacts and vulnerability in Europe 2012. EEA report No. 12. Copenhagen. 2012.Google Scholar
  10. EM-DAT – International Disaster Database. (2015). Centre for research on the epidemiology of disasters. Accessed 16 Apr 2015
  11. Etkin, D. (1999). Risk transference and related trends: Driving forces towards more mega-disasters. Environmental Hazards, 1, 69–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fordham, M. (1999). Participatory planning for flood mitigation: Models and approaches. Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 13(4), 27–34.Google Scholar
  13. Heffernan, O. (2012). No going back. Nature, 491, 659–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2012). Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation (A special report of Working Groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.Google Scholar
  15. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2014). Summary for policymakers. In Climate change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Jongman, B., et al. (2014). Increasing stress on disaster-risk finance due to large floods. Nature Climate Change, 4, 264–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kelman, I., Stojanov, R., Khan, S., Alvarez Gila, O., Duží, B., & Vikhrov, D. (2015). Islander mobilities: Any change from climate change? International Journal of Global Warming, 8(4), 584–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kreibich, H., Thieken, A. H., Petrow, T., Müller, M. & Merz, B. (2005). Flood loss reduction of private households due to building precautionary measures – lessons learned from the Elbe flood in August 2002. Natural Hazard and Earth System Sciences, 5(1), 117–126.Google Scholar
  19. Kreibich, H., Seifert, I., Thieken, A. H., Lindquist, E., Wagner, W. & Merz, B. (2011). Recent changes in flood preparedness of private households and business in Germany. Regional Environmental Change, 11(1), 59–71.Google Scholar
  20. Lass, W., Haas, A., Hinkel, J., & Jaeger, C. (2011). Avoiding the avoidable: Towards a european heat waves risk governance. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 1, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McCarthy, J. J., et al. (2001). Climate change 2001. Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability (Contribution of Working Group II to the third assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. McLeman, R., & Hunter, L. M. (2010). Migration in the context of vulnerability and adaptation to climate change: Insights from analogues. WIREs Climate Change, 1, 450–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mechler, R., & Kundzewicz, Z. W. (2010). Assessing adaptation to extreme weather events in Europe – Editorial. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies to Global Change, 15, 611–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Miceli, R., Sotgiu, I., & Settanni, M. (2008). Disaster preparedness and perception of flood risk: A study in an alpine valley in Italy. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28(2), 164–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Milan, A., & Ruano, S. (2014). Rainfall variability, food insecurity and migration in Cabricán, Guatemala. Climate and Development, 6(1), 61–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Neumann, K., & Hilderink, H. (2015). Opportunities and challenges for investigating the environment-migration nexus. Human Ecology, 43, 309–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Oliver-Smith, A. (2012). Debating environmental migration: Society, nature and population displacement in climate change. Journal of International Development, 24(8), 1058–1070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Plummer, R., & Baird, J. (2013). Adaptive co- management for climate change adaptation: Consideration for the Barents Region. Sustainability, 5, 629–642. doi: 10.3390/su5020629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Reid, H., Alam, M., Berger, R., Cannon, T., Huq, S. & Milligan, A. (2009). Participatory learning and action: Community-based adaptation to climate change. London: International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED).Google Scholar
  30. Siegrist, M., & Gutscher, H. (2006). Flooding risks: A comparison of lay people’s perceptions and expert’s assessments in Switzerland. Risk Analysis, 26(4), 971–979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stojanov, R., Kelman, I., Shen, S., Duží, B., Upadhyay, H., Vikhrov, D., Lingraj, G. J., & Mishra, A. (2014a). Contextualising typologies of environmentally induced population movement. Disaster Prevention and Management, 23(5), 508–523.Google Scholar
  32. Stojanov, R., Kelman, I., Martin, M., Vikhrov, D., Kniveton, D., & Duží, B. (2014b). Migration as adaptation? Population dynamics in the age of climate variability. Brno: Global Change Research Centre, Academy of the Sciences of the Czech Republic.Google Scholar
  33. Tacoli, C. (2009). Crisis or adaptation? Migration and climate change in a context of high mobility. Environment and Urbanization, 21(2), 513–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Vaishar, A., Hrádek, M., Kallabová, E., Kirchner, K., Klímová, A., Klusáček, P., Kolibová, B., Lacina, J., Munzar, J., Střítežská, Š. & Ondráček, S. (2002). Krajina. lidé a povodně v povodí řeky Moravy: regionálně geografická studie. Brno: Regiograph. 131 p.Google Scholar
  35. Vikhrov, D., Stojanov, R., Duží, B. & Juřička, D. (2014). Commuting patterns of Czech households exposed to flood risk from the Becva river. Environmental Hazards, 13(1), 58–72.Google Scholar
  36. Walker, W. E., Haasnoot, M., & Kwakkel, J. H. (2013). Adapt or perish: A review for planning approaches for adaptation under deep uncertainty. Sustainability, 5, 955–979. doi: 10.3390/su5030955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wamsler, C., & Brink, E. (2014). Planning for climatic extremes and variability: A review of Swedish municipalities’ adaptation responses. Sustainability, 6, 1359–1385. doi: 10.3390/su6031359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Warner, K., & Afifi, T. (2014). Where the rain falls: Evidence from 8 countries on how vulnerable households use migration to manage the risk of rainfall variability and food insecurity. Climate and Development, 6(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Stojanov
    • 1
    Email author
  • Barbora Duží
    • 2
  • Ilan Kelman
    • 3
    • 4
  • Daniel Němec
    • 5
  • David Procházka
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Business and Economics, Department of InformaticsMendel University in BrnoBrnoCzech Republic
  2. 2.Department of Environmental GeographyInstitute of Geonics of the CASBrnoCzech Republic
  3. 3.University College LondonLondonUK
  4. 4.University of AgderKristiansandNorway
  5. 5.Faculty of Economics and Administration, Department of EconomicsMasaryk UniversityBrnoCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations