Circular Migration and Local Adaptation in the Mountainous Community of Las Palomas (Mexico)

  • Noemi CasconeEmail author
  • Ana Elisa Peña del Valle Isla
  • Andrea Milan
Part of the Global Migration Issues book series (IOMS, volume 6)


Recent literature highlights the potential of migration as a part of successful adaptation strategies in the face of external stressors (Afifi et al., Migration and development, 2015; Bardsley and Hugo, Population Environ 32(2–3):238–262, 2010; Black et al., Nature 478(7370):447–449, 2011; McLeman and Smit, Clim Change 76:31–53, 2010; Tacoli, Environ Urbaniz 21:513–525, 2009). However, few studies have explored mobility patterns in mountain areas in the context of climate and environmental change (Kollmair and Banerjee, Drivers of migration in mountainous regions of the developing world: a review. Foresight: Migration and global environmental change driver review 9. Government Office for Science, London, 2010; Milan et al., Earth Syst Dyn 6(1):375, 2015a). This chapter explores the potential of circular migration programs as part of household strategies to diversify livelihoods and manage risks associated with environmental and climate change in Las Palomas, a village belonging to the municipality of Xichù, in Central Mexico. Additionally, this research examines various agricultural adaptation and capacity-building mechanisms which could heighten the resilience of Las Palomas. Based on primary qualitative data collected in December 2013, the results of this study suggest that well-conceived circular migration schemes could increase the adaptive capacity of Las Palomas to external stressors. In particular, the authors argue that sending one or more migrants abroad as a risk management strategy at the household level can allow the rest of the household to stay where they are and to increase their adaptive capacity through increased income and livelihood risks reduction. In addition, this chapter suggest several traditional agricultural methods through which households in Las Palomas could improve their resilience and eventually decrease their dependence on external sources of revenues such as remittances and governmental support.


Circular migration Risk management and adaptation strategies Climate change Mountainous areas 


  1. Adamo, S. B., & Izazola, H. (2010). Human migration and the environment. Population and Environment, 32(2–3), 105–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Afifi, T. (2011). Economic or environmental migration? The push factors in Niger. International Migration, 49, e95–e124. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2435.2010.00644.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Afifi, T., Milan, A., Etzold, B., et al. (2015). Human mobility in response to rainfall variability: Opportunities for migration as a successful adaptation strategy in eight case studies. Migration and Development. doi: 10.1080/21632324.2015.1022974. Accessed 24 Feb 2016.Google Scholar
  4. Aguilera, A., & Gómez, C. (2013). Economía, Población, y Migración en la Sierra Gorda. Cuaderno de Trabajo. Universidad de Guanajuato. 27 p.Google Scholar
  5. Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S. A. (BBVA). (2014). Migration outlook: Mexico. First half 2014 economic analysis 2014, joint project of BBVA Bancomer Foundation and Mexico Economic Research Department of BBVA Research. Translation from: Situación Migración México (2014). Primer Semestre 2014 Análisis Económico ISSN 2007-6932. Accessed 24 Feb 2016.
  6. Bardsley, D. K., & Hugo, G. J. (2010). Migration and climate change: Examining thresholds of change to guide effective adaptation decision-making. Population and Environment, 32(2–3), 238–262. doi: 10.1007/s11111-010-0126-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Basok, T. (2003). Mexican seasonal migration to Canada and development: A community-based comparison. International Migration, 41(2), 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beniston, M. (2003). Climatic change in mountain regions: A review of possible impacts. Climatic Change, 59, 5–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bettini, G. (2013). Climate barbarians at the gate? A critique of apocalyptic narratives on ‘climate refugees’. Geoforum, 45, 63–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Black, R., & Collyer, M. (2014). Populations ‘trapped’ at times of crisis. Forced Migration Review, 45, 52–56.Google Scholar
  11. Black, R., Bennett, S. R. G., Thomas, S. M., & Beddington, J. R. (2011). Climate change: Migration as adaptation. Nature, 478(7370), 447–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cloern, J. (2013). Eutrophication. The encyclopedia of Earth. Accessed 24 Feb 2016.
  13. Comisión Estatal del Agua de Guanajuato (CEAG). (2000). Sinopsis del Estudio de Prospección Hidrogeológica del Acuífero de Xichú, Gto. 69 páginas. Archivos en línea de la Comisión EStatal del Agua de Guanajuato.Google Scholar
  14. Comision Nacional de Áreas Naturales Protegidas (CONANP). (2005). Estudio Previo Justificativo para el establecimiento del Área Natural Protegida Reserva de la Biósfera Sierra Gorda de Guanajuato. 281 p.Google Scholar
  15. Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad (CONABIO). (2012). estrategia para la Conservación y Uso Sustentable de la Biodiversidad del Estado de Guanajuato. Tomo I Diagnóstico. 72 p.Google Scholar
  16. Consejo Nacional de Población (CONAPO). (2011). Indice de Marginación por entidad federativa y municipio 2010. Accessed 24 Feb 2016.
  17. Consejo Nacional de Población (CONAPO). (2012). Anexo B. Índices de intensidad migratoria México-Estados Unidos por entidad federativa y municipio 2010. El estado de la migración. Índices de intensidad migratoria. Colección: índices sociodemográficos. Accessed 24 Feb 2016.
  18. Cruz, D. (2013). Adaptación al Cambio Climático en el Área Protegida Sierra Gorda. Tésis de Licenciatura. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 141 p.Google Scholar
  19. de Moor, N. (2011). Labour migration for vulnerable communities: A strategy to adapt to a changing environment. Bielefeld: COMCAD. General Editor: Thomas Faist, Working Papers – Center on Migration, Citizenship and Development; 101.Google Scholar
  20. Foresight. (2011). Migration and global environmental change. Final project report. London: The Government Office for Science.Google Scholar
  21. Fund, W. (2014) Ecoregion. The encyclopedia of Earth. Accessed 24 Feb 2016.Google Scholar
  22. García Zamora, R. (2005). Collective remittances and the 3x1 as a transnational social learning process. Background paper presented at the seminar “Mexican Migrant Social and Civic Participation in the United States. Woodrow Wilson International Center For Scholars, Washington DC, November 4th and 5th.Google Scholar
  23. Global Commission on International Migration. (2005). Migration in an interconnected world: New directions for action. Geneva: GCIM.Google Scholar
  24. Gobierno del Estado de Guanajuato (GTO). (2013). El Padrón de Comunidades Indígenas del Estado de Guanajuato, monografía Indigenas: Palomas, Xichù. Secretaría de Desarrollo Social y Humano “Guanajuato orgullo y compromiso de todos” (GTO), Impulso Guanajuato. Accessed Feb 2016.
  25. Gobierno del Estado de Guanajuato (GTO). (n.d.). Programa Especial De Migración 2013–2018. Accessed 24 Feb 2016.
  26. Godde, P. M., Price, M. F., & Zimmermann, F. M. (Eds.). (2000). Tourism and development in mountain regions. New York: CABI Publishing.Google Scholar
  27. Gray, C. L. (2009). Environment, land, and rural out-migration in the southern Ecuadorian Andes. World Development, 37(2), 457–468. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2008.05.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gray, C. L., & Bilsborrow, R. E. (2013). Environmental influences on human migration in rural Ecuador. Demography, 50, 1217–1241. doi: 10.1007/s13524-012-0192-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gray, C. L., & Bilsborrow, R. E. (2014). Consequences of out-migration for land use in rural Ecuador. Land Use Policy, 36, 182–191. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.07.006. 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.07.006. Accessed 24 Feb 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hare, M. P. (2011). Forms of participatory modelling and its potential for widespread adoption in the water sector. Environmental Policy and Governance, 21(4), 386–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hugo, G. (1996). Environmental concerns and international migration. The International Migration Review, 30(1), 105–131. Accessed 24 Feb 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Instituto de Ecología del Estado (IEE). (2008). Hacia una Estrategia Estatal de Cambio Climático en Guanajuato. Gobierno del Estado de Guanjuato, 81 p.Google Scholar
  33. Instituto de los Mexicanos en el Exterior (IME). (2015). Progama 3X1. SEDESOL. Accessed 24 Feb 2016.
  34. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (INEGI). (2009). Prontuario de información geográfica municipal de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos Xichú, Guanajuato, Clave geoestadística 11045.Google Scholar
  35. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (INEGI). (2010a). Censo de Población y Vivienda 2010. Cuestionario ampliado. Accessed 24 Feb 2016.
  36. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (INEGI). (2010b). Principales resultados del Censo de Población y Vivienda 2010. Accessed 24 Feb 2016.
  37. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (INEGI). (2011a). Principales resultados del Censo de Población y Vivienda 2010: Guanajuato. México: INEGI. 84 p.Google Scholar
  38. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (INEGI). (2011b). Censo de Población y Vivienda (2010). México: Panorama sociodemográfico de Guanajuato. ISBN 978-607-494-208-8. Accessed 24 Feb 2016.
  39. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2007). Intergovernmental panel on climate change: Climate change: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2013). Intergovernmental panel on climate change: Climate change 2013: The physical science basis. In T. F. Stocker, D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S. K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex, & P. M. Midgley (Eds.), Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 1535 pp.Google Scholar
  41. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2014). Intergovernmental panel on climate change: Climate change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability, part a: Global and sectoral aspects. In C. B. Field, V. R. Barros, D. J. Dokken, K. J. Mach, M. D. Mastrandrea, T. E. Bilir, M. Chatterjee, K. L. Ebi, Y. O. Estrada, R. C. Genova, B. Girma, E. S. Kissel, A. N. Levy, S. MacCracken, P. R. Mastrandrea, & L. L. White (Eds.), Contribution of working group II to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 1132 pp.Google Scholar
  42. Jodha, N. S. (1992). Mountain perspective and sustainability: A framework for development strategies. In N. S. Jodha, M. Banskota, & T. Partap (Eds.), Sustainable mountain agriculture volume 1: Perspective and issues. New Delhi: Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. Scholar
  43. Jones, R. C. (2009). Migration permanence and village decline in Zacatecas: When you can’t go home again. The Professional Geographer, 61(3), 382–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Jones, R. C. (2014). The decline of international migration as an economic force in rural areas: A Mexican case study. International Migration Review, 48(3), 728–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Jones, J. J. M., Ochoa, R. F. O. Cabello, P. S. Knutson, R. D., Fernandez, C. C., Knutson, R. D., Westhoff, P. C, & Brown, D. S. (n.d.). Proyecciones para el Sector Agropecuario de México, Escenario Base del Sector Agropecuario en México, Proyecciones 2009–2018, Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería, Desarrollo Rural, Pesca y Alimentación Subsecretaría de Fomento a los Agronegocios, Agriculture and Food Policy Center Texas A&M, Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute University of Missouri, Gobierno federal, SAGARPA. Accessed 24 Feb 2016.
  46. Juarez, B., & Hansen, E. W. (2013). PROCAMPO 2013 subsidy program changes USDA Foreign Agricultural Service, Global Agricultural Information Network. Accessed 24 Feb 2016.
  47. Kaenzig, R. (2014). Can glacial retreat lead to migration? A critical discussion of the impact of glacier shrinkage upon population mobility in the Bolivian Andes. Population and Environment, 36, 480–496.Google Scholar
  48. Kälin, W. (2012). From the Nansen principles to the Nansen initiative. Forced Migration Review, 41, 48–49.Google Scholar
  49. Kollmair, M., & Banerjee, S. (2011). Drivers of migration in mountainous regions of the developing world: A review (Foresight: Migration and global environmental change driver review 9). London: Government Office for Science.Google Scholar
  50. Lira, M. G., Robson, J. P., & Klooster, D. J. (2015). Can indigenous transborder migrants affect environmental governance in their communities of origin? Evidence from Mexico. Population and Environment, 1–15. doi: 10.1007/s11111-015-0247-2
  51. Litre, G., & Bursztyn, M. (2015). Perceções e adaptação aos riscos climáticos e socioeconómicos na pecuária familiar do bioma Pamapa. Ambiente & Sociedade, 18(3), 55–80. 09/2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Massey, D., & Brown, A. E. (2011). Movement between Mexico and Canada: Analysis of a new migration stream. International Migration, 6(1), 119–144 (Geneva, Switzerland).Google Scholar
  53. McAdam, J. (Ed.). (2010). Climate change and displacement: Multidisciplinary perspectives. Oxford: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
  54. McLeman, R. A., & Hunter, L. M. (2010). Migration in the context of vulnerability and adaptation to climate change: Insights from analogues. Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Climate Change, 1(3), 450–461.  10.1002/wcc.51. Accessed 24 Feb 2016.Google Scholar
  55. McLeman, R. A., & Smit, B. (2006). Migration as an adaptation to climate change. Climatic Change, 76, 31–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. McLoughlin, S., Münz, R., Bünte, R., Hultin, G., Müller, W., & Skeldon, R. (2011). Temporary and circular migration: Opportunities and challenges. European Policy Centre, Working Paper, (35).Google Scholar
  57. Messerli, B., Viviroli, D., & Weingartner, R. (2004). Mountains of the world: Vulnerable water towers for the 21 century. Ambio, 13, 29–34.Google Scholar
  58. Milan, A., & Ho, R. (2014). Livelihood and migration patterns at different altitudes in the Central Highlands of Peru. Climate and Development, 6(1), 69–76. doi: 10.1080/17565529.2013.826127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Milan, A., & Ruano, S. (2014). Rainfall variability, food insecurity and migration in Cabricán, Guatemala. Climate and Development, 6(1), 61–68. doi: 10.1080/17565529.2013.857589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Milan, A., Gioli, G., & Afifi, T. (2015a). Migration and global environmental change: Methodological lessons from mountain areas of the global south. Earth System Dynamics, 6(1), 375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Milan, A., Melde, S., Cascone, N., Schindler, M., & Warner, K. (2015b). When do household benefit from migration? Insights from vulnerable environments in Haiti: Migration, Environment, and Climate Change: Policy Brief Series: Issue 8, vol (1). Accessed 24 Feb 2016.
  62. Milan, A., Melde, S., Cascone, N. (Forthcoming). MECLEP Haïti: Une Analyse de la relation entre la vulnérabilité et la migration dans le contexte d’adaptation à la dégradation environnementale et catastrophes. Rapport: l’enquête auprès des ménages. International Organization for Migration.Google Scholar
  63. Mortreux, C., & Barnett, J. (2009). Climate change, migration and adaptation in Funafuti, Tuvalu. Global Environmental Change, 19, 105–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Moser, S. C., & Ekstrom, J. A. (2010). A framework to diagnose barriers to climate change. PNAS, 107, 22026–22031. Early edition.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Murphy, D. W. (2015). Theorizing climate change, (im) mobility and socio-ecological systems resilience in low-elevation coastal zones. Climate and Development, 7(4), 380–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Nawrotzki, R. J., Hunter, L. M., Runfola, D. M., & Riosmena, F. (2015a). Climate change as a migration driver from rural and urban Mexico. Environmental Research Letters, 10(11), 114023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Nawrotzki, R. J., Riosmena, F., Hunter, L. M., & Runfola, D. M. (2015b). Amplification or suppression: Social networks and the climate change—Migration association in rural Mexico. Global Environmental Change, 35, 463–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Ortiz-Timoteo, J., Sánchez-Sánchez, O., & Ramos-Prado, J. M. (2014). Productive activities and management of the Milpa in three communities of the Municipality of Jesús Carranza, VERACRUZ, MEXICO. Polibotánica, 38, 173–191.Google Scholar
  69. Parker, S. W. (2003). Shanghai poverty conference – Scaling up poverty reduction case study. The oportunidades program in Mexico. Accessed 24 Feb 2016.
  70. Peña del Valle, A. E. (2014). Al mal tiempo, buena resiliencia, Revista Ciencias. Enero 2014 (pp. 111–112). Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar
  71. Piguet, E. (2012). Migration: The drivers of human migration. Nature Climate Change, 2, 400–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Presidencia Municipal de Xichú. (2010). Acuerdo Municipal Mediante el cual se Aprueba el Plan de Gobierno Municipal 2009–2012 del Municipio de Xichú, gto., Periódico Oficial del Gobierno del Estado de Guanajuato. Google Scholar
  73. Ramírez-Albores, J. E., Gordillo-Martínez, A., & Navarro-Sigüenza, A. G. (2015). Registros notables y listado avifaunístico en un área de la Reserva de la Biosfera Sierra Gorda de Guanajuato, México. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad, 86(4), 1058–1064. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Richardson, G. P., & Andersen, D. F. (1995). Teamwork in group model building. System Dynamics Review, 11(2), 113–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Richmond, B. (1997). The strategic forum: Aligning objective, strategy, and process. System Dynamics Review, 13(2), 131–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Robson, J. P. (2010). The impact of rural to urban migration on forest commons in Oaxaca, Mexico. Dissertation, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.Google Scholar
  77. SAGARPA. (2014). Transformación de PROCAMPO a PROAGRO acentúa impulso a producción agroalimentaria Mexico D.F. Accessed 24 Feb 2016.Google Scholar
  78. Sánchez, J. (2014, February 24). Celaya, Aportará el estado 55 mdp para el programa Migrante: Vargas, La Prensa, Organización Editorial Mexicana S.A. de C.V. Accessed 24 Feb 2016.
  79. Smethurst, D. (2000). Mountain geography. Geographical Review, 90, 35–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Stark, O., & Bloom, D. E. (1985). The new economics of labour migration. The American Economic Review, 75, 173–178.Google Scholar
  81. Stark, O., & Levhari, D. (1982). On migration and risk in LDC. Economics Development and Culture Change, 31, 191–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Tacoli, C. (2009). Crisis or adaptation? Migration and climate change in a context of high mobility. Environment and Urbanization, 21, 513–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Vennix, J. (1996). Group model building. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  84. Vennix, J. (1999). Group model-building: Tackling messy problems. System Dynamics Review, 15(4), 379–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Vertovec, S. (2008). Circular migration: The way forward in global policy? Canadian Diversity, 6(3), 36–40.Google Scholar
  86. Viviroli, D., Dürr, H. H., Messerli, B., Meybeck, M., & Weingartner, R. (2007). Mountains of the world, water towers for humanity: Typology, mapping, and global significance. Water Resources Research, 43, W07447. doi: 10.1029/2006WR005653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Warner, K. (2011). Interdisciplinary approaches to researching environmental change and migration: Methodological considerations and field experiences from the EACH-FOR project. In C. Vargas-Silva (Ed.), Handbook of research methods in migration (pp. 366–395). Oxford: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  88. Warner, K., & Afifi, T. (2014). Where the rain falls: Evidence from 8 countries on how vulnerable households use migration to manage the risk of rainfall variability and food insecurity. Climate and Development, 6, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. World Bank (2014). A model from Mexico for the world. Accessed 24 Feb 2016.
  90. World Wildlife Fund (WWF). (n.d). Ecoregions. Accessed 24 Feb 2016.
  91. Wrathall, D. J. (2012). Migration amidst social-ecological regime shift: The search for stability in Garifuna villages of northern Honduras. Human Ecology, 40, 583–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Noemi Cascone
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ana Elisa Peña del Valle Isla
    • 2
  • Andrea Milan
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Environmental & Human Security, United Nations UniversityBonnGermany
  2. 2.Research Programme on Climate ChangeNational Autonomous University of MéxicoMéxicoMexico

Personalised recommendations