Skip to main content

On Partial Features in the \(\mathcal{DLF}\) Family of Description Logics

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
PRICAI 2016: Trends in Artificial Intelligence (PRICAI 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 9810))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The \(\mathcal{DLF}\) family of description logics are fragments of first order logic with underlying signatures based on unary predicate symbols, called atomic concepts, and unary function symbols interpreted as total functions, called features. We show how computational properties relating to a key reasoning service for dialects of this family are preserved when (a) unary function symbols are now interpreted as partial functions, and when (b) a concept constructor is admitted that can characterize circumstances in which partial functions become total.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Such issues can be (and we believe should be) explicitly addressed elsewhere in an ontology.

  2. 2.

    This arrangement is common and is referred to as the strict interpretation of undefined values.

  3. 3.

    The last rule in the figure does not apply to \({ partial\!-\! \mathcal{{CFD}}}\) and is added w.l.o.g. in preparation for treating \({partial\!-\!}{{\mathcal {CFD}}}^{\forall }_{nc}\). This rule is neither necessary nor applicable in the \({ partial\!-\! \mathcal{{CFD}}}\) case.

  4. 4.

    The details for this are beyond the scope of the paper.

References

  1. Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D.L., Nardi, D., Patel-Schneider, P.F.: The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation, and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Hopcroft, J.E., Ullman, J.D.: Introduction to Automata Theory, Languages and Computation. Addison-Wesley, Boston (1979)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Khizder, V.L., Toman, D., Weddell, G.: Reasoning about duplicate elimination with description logic. In: Rules and Objects in Databases (DOOD, part of CL 2000), pp. 1017–1032 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ramakrishnan, R.: Magic templates: a spellbinding approach to logic programs. J. Logic Program. 11(3 & 4), 189–216 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Toman, D., Weddell, G.: On attributes, roles, and dependencies in description logics and the ackermann case of the decision problem. In: Description Logics 2001, CEUR-WS, vol. 49, pp. 76–85 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Toman, D., Weddell, G.: On reasoning about structural equality in XML: a description logic approach. Theor. Comput. Sci. 336(1), 181–203 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Toman, D., Weddell, G.E.: On keys and functional dependencies as first-class citizens in description logics. J. Aut. Reason. 40(2–3), 117–132 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Toman, D., Weddell, G.E.: Applications and extensions of PTIME description logics with functional constraints. In: Proceedings International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), pp. 948–954 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Toman, D., Weddell, G.E.: Conjunctive query answering in \({\cal CFD}_{nc}\): a PTIME description logic with functional constraints and disjointness. In: AI 2013: Advances in Artificial Intelligence - 26th Australasian Joint Conference, Dunedin, New Zealand, pp. 350–361 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Toman, D., Weddell, G.E.: Answering queries over \({\cal CFD}^{\forall }_{nc}\) knowledge bases. Technical report CS-2014-14, Cheriton School of Computer Science, University of Waterloo (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Toman, D., Weddell, G.: On adding inverse features to the description logic \({\cal CFD}^{\forall }_{nc}\). In: Pham, D.-N., Park, S.-B. (eds.) PRICAI 2014. LNCS, vol. 8862, pp. 587–599. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Toman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Toman, D., Weddell, G. (2016). On Partial Features in the \(\mathcal{DLF}\) Family of Description Logics. In: Booth, R., Zhang, ML. (eds) PRICAI 2016: Trends in Artificial Intelligence. PRICAI 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9810. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42911-3_44

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42911-3_44

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-42910-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-42911-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics