Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Landscapes: the Arts, Aesthetics, and Education ((LAAE,volume 20))

  • 602 Accesses

Abstract

This paper critiques action research and similar models of investigation into design practice. It argues that action research is compromised. On the one hand it is too scholastic while, on the other hand, too caught up in practical ends. In viewing research into practice as a scholastic “project” action research privileges values of rational over irrational transactions favouring goals of remediation rather than understanding in the explanation of practical production. Integrating the theoretical work of Cornell realist Richard Boyd with Gilles Deleuze’s systematic interpretation of Foucault’s theory of knowledge-power, this paper advances a functional account of artistic practice. Rather than a linear process proceeding from inception to outcomes, artistic practice is portrayed as a set of interdependent agencies held in homeostatic relation. The paper goes on to illustrate the practical agency and functional relations underlying two related examples of creative practice in design.

Brown, N. (2000). The representation of practice. In Working papers on art and design, Vol. 1. Used with permission of the University of Hertfordshire, (http://www.herts.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0016/12283/WPIAAD_vol1_brown.pdf).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baudrillard, J. (1996). System of objects. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1982). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Cambridge: The Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1998). Practical reason: On the theory of action. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R. (1988). How to be a moral realist. In G. Sayre-McCord (Ed.), Essays on moral realism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, N. C., & Thomas, K. (1999, September). Creativity as collective misrecognition in the relationships between art students and their teachers. INSEA Congress, Published Proceedings, Brisbane, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Candy, L., & Edmonds, E. (1996). Creative design for the Lotus bicycle: Implications for knowledge support systems research. Design Studies, 17, 71–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Getzels, J. W. (1971). Discovery-oriented behaviour and the originality of creative products: A study with artists. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 19(1), 47–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (1988). Foucault. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (1991). Bergsonism. New York: Zone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (1995). Negotiations 1972–1990. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H., & Nemirovsky, R. (1991). From private intuitions to public symbol systems: An examination of the creative process in Georg Cantor and Sigmund Freud. Creativity Research Journal, 4(1), 11–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harré, R. (1983). Personal being: A theory for individual psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1991). Beyond modularity. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, J. F. (1987). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, D. N. (1981). The mind’s best work. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H. (1987). The many faces of realism. La Salle: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, R. (1993). Case studies of creativity and innovative product development. Design Studies, 14(4), 423–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. (1995). The construction of social reality. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T. (1993). Designing design: Modernity for sale. In Making the modern: Industry art and design in America. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., & Frensch, P. A. (Eds.). (1991). Complex problem solving: Principles and mechanisms. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brown, N.C.M. (2017). The Representation of Practice. In: Studies in Philosophical Realism in Art, Design and Education. Landscapes: the Arts, Aesthetics, and Education, vol 20. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42906-9_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42906-9_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-42904-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-42906-9

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics