Abstract
This chapter poses the question of what should be taught in the visual arts in primary schools? Syllabuses are often unable to meet their obligations in helping teachers distinguish suitable artistic content, either because of their competency based focus or because of stereotyped assumptions about children’s creative autonomy in the primary school. In this chapter the character of the visual arts is considered as a kind of practice and considered from three different perspectives of artistic value. Recognition is afforded to the ways in which success in children’s art is governed by values representing the quality of artistic ends rather than, for example, in acquiring technical routines, or in defaulting to the creation of vernacular imagery. Three value sources for the visual arts are proposed comprising the structural, sociocultural and psychological. These alternative value bases are explored as ways of helping teachers and students negotiate a wider range of activities within a framework of identifiable artistic ends.
Brown, N. C. M. (1990). Distinguishing artistic from vernacular performances in the Visual Arts: A classroom perspective. In Occasional Seminar 2: Understanding art as the basis for primary art teaching, pp. 1–11. Paddington, NSW: UNSW, College of Fine Arts. Reprinted by permission of UNSW Art & Design, www.artdesign.unsw.edu.au
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beardsley, M. C. (1981). Aesthetics: Problems in the philosophy of criticism. Indianapolis: Hackett.
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Danto, A. (1981). The transfiguration of the commonplace. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Dewey, J. (1958). Art as experience. New York: Capricorn.
Freeman, N.H. (1991). Drawing: The representation of public representations. Chichester: Wiley.
Goodman, N. (1976). The languages of art. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.
Grundy, S. (1987). Curriculum: Product or praxis. London: Falmer Press.
Habermas, J. (1972). Knowledge and human interests (2nd ed.). London: Heinemann.
Ingram, D. (1987). Habermas and the dialectic of reason. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Kolnai, A. (1978). Ethics value and reality. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.
Parsons, M. (1987). How we understand art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J. R. (1981). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
van Sommers, P. (1984). Drawing and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Brown, N.C.M. (2017). Distinguishing Artistic from Vernacular Performances in the Visual Arts: A Classroom Perspective. In: Studies in Philosophical Realism in Art, Design and Education. Landscapes: the Arts, Aesthetics, and Education, vol 20. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42906-9_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42906-9_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-42904-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-42906-9
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)