Skip to main content

Complications of ART and Associated Early Pregnancy Problems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 618 Accesses

Abstract

A healthy, term live birth following assisted reproduction in the most desired outcome. However, during the various phases of treatment, complications may arise. In this chapter, we present an up-to-date knowledge of ART associated complications, their prevalence and means of diagnosis. Described risks are related to ovarian stimulation, oocyte retrieval, as well as early pregnancy. Over-response and development of potentially life threatening ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome is related to ovarian stimulation with gonadotropins. Oocyte retrieval can be followed by bleeding and injury to the internal pelvic organs. Once pregnancy establishes, the risk of miscarriage and ectopic pregnancy occurs. ART complication associated with long term implications for the couple and the offspring is development of a multiple pregnancy. It is important to be aware of the potential serious complications that may arise during ART. These should be weighed against potential benefits and couples counselled accordingly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Klemetti R, Gissler M, Hemminki E. Comparison of perinatal health of children born from IVF in Finland in the early and late 1990s. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(8):2192–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Williams C, Sutcliffe A. Infant outcomes of assisted reproduction. Early Hum Dev. 2009;85(11):673–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Isaksson R, Gissler M, Tiitinen A. Obstetric outcome among women with unexplained infertility after IVF: a matched case–control study. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(7):1755–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Talaulikar VS, Arulkumaran S. Reproductive outcomes after assisted conception. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2012;67(9):566–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Talaulikar VS, Arulkumaran S. Maternal, perinatal and long-term outcomes after assisted reproductive techniques (ART): implications for clinical practice. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;170(1):13–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Vloeberghs V, et al. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and complications of ART. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;23(5):691–709.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Golan A, et al. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: an update review. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1989;44(6):430–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Brinsden PR, et al. Diagnosis, prevention and management of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995;102(10):767–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. European Society of Human Reproduction (ESHRE). Special Interest Group (SIG) guidelines on ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). 2005. Available from: http://www.eshre.com/emc.

  10. Vlahos NF, Gregoriou O. Prevention and management of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006;1092:247–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Soares SR, et al. Targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor system to prevent ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Hum Reprod Update. 2008;14(4):321–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Navot D, Bergh PA, Laufer N. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in novel reproductive technologies: prevention and treatment. Fertil Steril. 1992;58(2):249–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Aboulghar MA, Mansour RT. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: classifications and critical analysis of preventive measures. Hum Reprod Update. 2003;9(3):275–89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). The management of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Green-top Guideline. 2006;5:1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mathur RS, et al. Distinction between early and late ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2000;73(5):901–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Delvigne A, Rozenberg S. Epidemiology and prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS): a review. Hum Reprod Update. 2002;8(6):559–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee TH, et al. Serum anti-Mullerian hormone and estradiol levels as predictors of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in assisted reproduction technology cycles. Hum Reprod. 2008;23(1):160–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jayaprakasan K, et al. Prediction of in vitro fertilization outcome at different antral follicle count thresholds in a prospective cohort of 1,012 women. Fertil Steril. 2012;98(3):657–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhao JZ, et al. In vitro maturation and fertilization of oocytes from unstimulated ovaries in infertile women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2009;91(6):2568–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. D’Angelo A, Amso N. Embryo freezing for preventing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;3, CD002806.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Aboulghar M, Evers JH, Al-Inany H. Intravenous albumin for preventing severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a Cochrane review. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(12):3027–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Baumgarten M, et al. Do dopamine agonists prevent or reduce the severity of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in women undergoing assisted reproduction? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2013;16(3):168–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Al-Inany HG, Abou-Setta AM, Aboulghar M. Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonists for assisted conception: a Cochrane review. Reprod Biomed Online. 2007;14(5):640–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Abbara A, et al. Efficacy of Kisspeptin-54 to trigger oocyte maturation in women at high risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) during in vitro fertilization (IVF) therapy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100(9):3322–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Evbuomwan IO, Davison JM, Murdoch AP. Coexistent hemoconcentration and hypoosmolality during superovulation and in severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a volume homeostasis paradox. Fertil Steril. 2000;74(1):67–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Maslovitz S, et al. Renal blood flow alteration after paracentesis in women with ovarian hyperstimulation. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104(2):321–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Levin I, et al. Effect of paracentesis of ascitic fluids on urinary output and blood indices in patients with severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2002;77(5):986–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Meldrum DR, et al. Prospective characterization and selective management of the abdominal compartment syndrome. Am J Surg. 1997;174(6):667–72; discussion 672–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Abuzeid MI, et al. Pigtail catheter for the treatment of ascites associated with ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Hum Reprod. 2003;18(2):370–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Wikland M, Enk L, Hamberger L. Transvesical and transvaginal approaches for the aspiration of follicles by use of ultrasound. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1985;442:182–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bennett SJ, et al. Complications of transvaginal ultrasound-directed follicle aspiration: a review of 2670 consecutive procedures. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1993;10(1):72–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ludwig AK, et al. Perioperative and post-operative complications of transvaginal ultrasound-guided oocyte retrieval: prospective study of >1000 oocyte retrievals. Hum Reprod. 2006;21(12):3235–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Bodri D, et al. Complications related to ovarian stimulation and oocyte retrieval in 4052 oocyte donor cycles. Reprod Biomed Online. 2008;17(2):237–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Dessole S, et al. Blood loss following noncomplicated transvaginal oocyte retrieval for in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2001;76(1):205–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Akman MA, et al. Perforated appendicitis and ectopic pregnancy following in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod. 1995;10(12):3325–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Roest J, et al. The incidence of major clinical complications in a Dutch transport IVF programme. Hum Reprod Update. 1996;2(4):345–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Sauer MV. Defining the incidence of serious complications experienced by oocyte donors: a review of 1000 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;184(3):277–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Fugita OE, Kavoussi L. Laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation for ureteral lesion secondary to transvaginal ultrasonography for oocyte retrieval. Urology. 2001;58(2):281.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Sharpe K, et al. Transvaginal oocyte retrieval for in vitro fertilization complicated by ovarian abscess during pregnancy. Fertil Steril. 2006;86(1):219.e11–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kelada E, Ghani R. Bilateral ovarian abscesses following transvaginal oocyte retrieval for IVF: a case report and review of literature. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2007;24(4):143–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Serour GI, et al. Complications of medically assisted conception in 3,500 cycles. Fertil Steril. 1998;70(4):638–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Gorkemli H, Camus M, Clasen K. Adnexal torsion after gonadotrophin ovulation induction for IVF or ICSI and its conservative treatment. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2002;267(1):4–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Mashiach S, et al. Adnexal torsion of hyperstimulated ovaries in pregnancies after gonadotropin therapy. Fertil Steril. 1990;53(1):76–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Fleischer AC, Brader KR. Sonographic depiction of ovarian vascularity and flow: current improvements and future applications. J Ultrasound Med. 2001;20(3):241–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Grady R, et al. Elective single embryo transfer and perinatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2012;97(2):324–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Katalinic A, et al. Pregnancy course and outcome after intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a controlled, prospective cohort study. Fertil Steril. 2004;81(6):1604–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Raber W, et al. Thyroxine treatment modified in infertile women according to thyroxine-releasing hormone testing: 5 year follow-up of 283 women referred after exclusion of absolute causes of infertility. Hum Reprod. 2003;18(4):707–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Ehrmann DA. Polycystic ovary syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(12):1223–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Sutcliffe AG, Ludwig M. Outcome of assisted reproduction. Lancet. 2007;370(9584):351–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Pezeshki K, et al. Bleeding and spontaneous abortion after therapy for infertility. Fertil Steril. 2000;74(3):504–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Wang JX, Norman RJ, Wilcox AJ. Incidence of spontaneous abortion among pregnancies produced by assisted reproductive technology. Hum Reprod. 2004;19(2):272–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Ludwig M, et al. Heterotopic pregnancy in a spontaneous cycle: do not forget about it! Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1999;87(1):91–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Kennedy, R. Risks and complications of assisted conception. British Fertility Society Factsheet 2005 [cited 2012 01.10.2012]. Available from: http://www.britishfertilitysociety.org.uk/public/factsheets/docs/BFS-risksandcomplicationsofassistedconception.pdf.

  54. Winder S, Reid S, Condous G. Ultrasound diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy. Australas J Ultrasound Med. 2011;14(2):29–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Noci I, et al. Interference of exogenous HCG on pregnancy tests. Acta Eur Fertil. 1987;18(6):391–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Fauser BC, Devroey P, Macklon NS. Multiple birth resulting from ovarian stimulation for subfertility treatment. Lancet. 2005;365(9473):1807–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Blickstein I. Estimation of iatrogenic monozygotic twinning rate following assisted reproduction: pitfalls and caveats. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192(2):365–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Vela G, et al. Monozygotic pregnancies conceived by in vitro fertilization: understanding their prognosis. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(2):606–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Vitthala S, et al. The risk of monozygotic twins after assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2009;15(1):45–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Wilcox L, et al. Assisted reproductive technologies: estimates of their contribution to multiple births and newborn hospital days in the United States. Fertil Steril. 1996;65(2):361–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Milki AA, et al. Incidence of monozygotic twinning with blastocyst transfer compared to cleavage-stage transfer. Fertil Steril. 2003;79(3):503–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. HFEA. Improving outcomes for fertility patients: multiple births. 2011 [cited 2012 15.10.2012]. Available from: http://www.hfea.gov.uk/docs/2011-12-01_-_Multiple_Births_Publication_2011_-_Rationalising_Register_Data_-_FINAL_1.2.DOC.pdf.

  63. Janvier A, Spelke B, Barrington KJ. The epidemic of multiple gestations and neonatal intensive care unit use: the cost of irresponsibility. J Pediatr. 2011;159(3):409–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Joy J, McClure N, Cooke IE. A comparison of spontaneously conceived twins and twins conceived by artificial reproductive technologies. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;28(6):580–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Morcel K, et al. Perinatal morbidity and mortality in twin pregnancies with dichorionic placentas following assisted reproductive techniques or ovarian induction alone: a comparative study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010;153(2):138–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. McDonald SD, et al. Preterm birth and low birth weight among in vitro fertilization singletons: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009;146(2):138–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Vilska S, et al. Mental health of mothers and fathers of twins conceived via assisted reproduction treatment: a 1-year prospective study. Hum Reprod. 2009;24(2):367–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Society of Obstetricians annd Gynaecologists of Canada, Okun N, Sierra S. Pregnancy outcomes after assisted human reproduction. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2014;36(1):64–83.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Skiadas CC, et al. Spontaneous reduction before 12 weeks’ gestation and selective reduction similarly extend time to delivery in in vitro fertilization of trichorionic-triamniotic triplets. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(2):596–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Stone J, et al. Contemporary outcomes with the latest 1000 cases of multifetal pregnancy reduction (MPR). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199(4):406.e1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Calhoun KC, et al. Evaluating the association between assisted conception and the severity of preeclampsia. ISRN Obstet Gynecol. 2011;2011:928592.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Healy DL, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for obstetric haemorrhage in 6730 singleton births after assisted reproductive technology in Victoria Australia. Hum Reprod. 2010;25(1):265–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Reefhuis J, et al. Assisted reproductive technology and major structural birth defects in the United States. Hum Reprod. 2009;24(2):360–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Basso O, Olsen J. Subfecundity and neonatal mortality: longitudinal study within the Danish national birth cohort. BMJ. 2005;330(7488):393–4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Leunens L, et al. Follow-up of cognitive and motor development of 10-year-old singleton children born after ICSI compared with spontaneously conceived children. Hum Reprod. 2008;23(1):105–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miriam N. Baumgarten MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Polanski, L.T., Baumgarten, M.N. (2017). Complications of ART and Associated Early Pregnancy Problems. In: Jayaprakasan, K., Kean, L. (eds) Clinical Management of Pregnancies following ART. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42858-1_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42858-1_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-42856-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-42858-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics