Skip to main content

Raising Self-Controlled Children. A Philosophical Analysis of Neuroscience and Social Psychology Perspectives

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Parental Responsibility in the Context of Neuroscience and Genetics

Part of the book series: International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine ((LIME,volume 69))

Abstract

In recent decades, self-control has received increasing attention as it can safeguard child-development and human wellbeing. Researchers from various disciplines – philosophy, neuroscience and social psychology – have investigated what self-control is, how it is generated and how it can be stimulated. This chapter critically reflects on recent discussions of the concept and the science of self-control while investigating their bearings on the question of whether parents have a responsibility to raise self-controlled children and what that would entail. The argument put forth is that current social psychology and neuroscience largely investigates controlled behaviour but ignores the prefix self. Consequently, a more comprehensive understanding of the term that does justice to both aspects is provided. This gives rise to two different sets of educational goals. Firstly, raising self-controlled children entails teaching them strategies to overcome temptation. Secondly, it requires that parents support children to develop a self that sets its own goals, reflects on these goals and considers them as reasons for action.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aha! Parenting. 2013. 8 steps to help your child develop self-control. Retrieved from www.ahaparenting.com/_blog/Parenting_Blog/post/Help_Your_Child_Develop_Self_Control/.

  • Aristotle. 1980. The Nicomachean ethics. Trans. D. Ross. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aron, A.R., T.W. Robbins, and R.A. Poldrack. 2004. Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex. Trends in Cognitive Science 8(4): 170–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R.F. 2012. Self-control the moral muscle. The Psychologist 25(2): 112–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R.F., and T.F. Heatherton. 1996. Self-regulation failure: An overview. Psychological Inquiry 7(1): 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R.F., and J. Tierney. 2011. Willpower, why self-control is the secret to success. London: Allan Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R.F., T.F. Heatherton, and D.M. Tice. 1994. Losing control: How and why people fail at self-regulation. San Diego: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkman, E.T., A.M. Graham, and P.a. Fisher. 2012. Training self-control: A domain-general translational neuroscience approach. Child Development Perspectives 6(4): 374–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betzler, M. 2015. Enhancing the capacity for autonomy: What parents owe their children to make their lives go well. In The nature of children’s wellbeing, theory and practice, ed. A. Bagattini and C.M. Macleod, 65–84. Berlin/New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browers, E. 2012. The everything’s parent’s guide to the strong-willed child, A positive approach to increase self-control, improve communication and reduce conflict. Avan: Adams Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, P.G. 2000. Diagnosing agency. Philosophy, Psychiatry and Psychology 7(2): 107–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C.S., and M.F. Scheier. 1998. On the self-regulation of behavior. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Casey, B.J., L.H. Somerville, I.H. Gotlib, O. Ayduk, N.T. Franklin, M.K. Askren, et al. 2011. Behavioral and neural correlates of delay of gratification 40 years later. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108(36): 14998–15003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cervone, D., W.G. Shadel, R.E. Smith, and M. Fiori. 2006. Self-regulation: Reminders and suggestions from personality science. Applied Psychology: An International Review 55(3): 333–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D. 1980. How is weakness of the will possible? In Essays on actions and events, ed. D. Davidson, 21–42. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E.L., and R.M. Ryan. 2000. The “what” and “why” of goal pursuit: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry 11(4): 227–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankfurt, H.G. 1988. Freedom of the will and the concept of a person. In The importance of what we care about, ed. H.G. Frankfurt, 11–25. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, M.R., and T. Hirschi. 1990. The general theory of crime. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagger, M.S., C. Wood, C. Stiff, and N.L.D. Chatzisarantis. 2010. Ego depletion and the strength model of self-control: A meta analysis. Psychological Bulletin 136(4): 495–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hare, T.A., C.F. Camerer, and A. Rangel. 2009. Self-control in decision-making involves modulation of the vmPFC valuation system. Science 324: 646–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henden, E. 2008. What is self-control? Philosophical Psychology 21(1): 69–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horstkötter, D. 2015. Self-control and normativity. Theories in Social Psychology Revisited Theory and Psychology 25(1): 25–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horstkötter, D., and A. Snoek. 2013. The importance of the self for autonomous behavior. American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 4(4): 62–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennett, J. 2001. Agency and responsibility: A common-sense moral psychology. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korsgaard, C.M. 1989. Personal identity and the unity of agency: A Kantian response to Parfit. Philosophy and Public Affairs 18(2): 101–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korsgaard, C.M. 1999. Self-constitution in the ethics of Plato and Kant. The Journal of Ethics 3: 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loeber, R., B. Menting, D.R. Lynam, T.E. Moffitt, M. Stouthamer-Loeber, R. Stallings, and D. Pardini. 2012. Findings from the Pittsburgh Youth Study: Cognitive impulsivity and intelligence as predictors of the age-crime curve. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 51(11): 1136–1149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGonigal, K. 2012. The willpower instinct. How self-control works, why it matters and what you can do to get more of it. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mele, A.R. 1995. Autonomous agents: From self-control to autonomy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mischel, W. 2014. The marshmallow test: Mastering self-control. New York: Little, Brown and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mischel, W., E.B. Ebbesen, and A. Raskoff Zeiss. 1972. Cognitive and attentional mechanisms in delay of gratification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 21(2): 204–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mischel, W., Y. Shoda, and M.L. Rodriguez. 1989. Delay of gratification in children. Science 244: 933–938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mischel, W., N. Cantor, and S. Feldman. 1996. Principles of self-regulation: The nature of willpower and self-control. In Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles, ed. E.T. Higgins and A.W. Kruglanski, 329–360. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moffitt, T.E., L. Arseneault, D. Belsky, N. Dickson, R.J. Hancox, H. Harrington, and A. Caspi. 2011. A gradient of childhood self-control predicts health, wealth, and public safety. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108(7): 2693–2698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muraven, M., and R.F. Baumeister. 2000. Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: Does self-control resemble a muscle? Psychological Bulletin 126(2): 247–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muraven, M., D.M. Tice, and R.F. Baumeister. 1998. Self-control as limited resource: Regulatory depletion patterns. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74(3): 774–789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plato. 1952. Phaedrus. Trans: R. Hackforth. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R.M., and E.L. Deci. 1999. Approaching and avoiding self-determination: Comparing cybernetic and organismic paradigms of motivation. In Perspectives on behavioral self-regulation, vol. 12, ed. R.S. Wyer Jr., 193–215. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R.M., and E.L. Deci. 2002. An overview of self-determination theory: An organismic-dialectical perspective. In Handbook of self-determination research, ed. E.L. Deci and R.M. Ryan, 3–33. Rochester: The University of Rochester Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slutske, W.S., T.E. Moffitt, R. Poulton, and A. Caspi. 2012. Undercontrolled temperament at age 3 predicts disordered gambling at age 32: A longitudinal study of a complete birth cohort. Psychological Science 23(5): 510–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strayhorn, J.M.J. 2002. Self-control: Toward systematic training programs. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 41(1): 17–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velleman, D.J. 2000. What happens when someone acts? In The possibility of practical reason, ed. D.J. Velleman, 123–143. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, George, and Shpall, Samuel. 2012. Action, In The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Summer 2012 Edition), ed. Edward N. Zalta, URL = http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2012/entries/action/.

  • Wringe, C. 2015. Beyond useful knowledge: Developing the subjective self. Journal of Philosophy of Education 49(1): 32–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dorothee Horstkötter .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Horstkötter, D. (2017). Raising Self-Controlled Children. A Philosophical Analysis of Neuroscience and Social Psychology Perspectives. In: Hens, K., Cutas, D., Horstkötter, D. (eds) Parental Responsibility in the Context of Neuroscience and Genetics. International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine, vol 69. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42834-5_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics