Skip to main content

Information Sharing in Contemporary Operations: The Strength of SOF Ties

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Information Sharing in Military Operations

Abstract

The complexity of contemporary operations makes efficient information sharing one of the key challenges for multinational cooperation. Today’s operations are conducted by military personnel from diverse backgrounds, often operating in a foreign culture alongside host nation military and police forces. In this chapter, we examine the special operations forces command centers involved in counter-network operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. We found that by flattening their command structures, leveraging state-of-the art technology, and replacing the “need to know” with the “need to share” mindset, these organizations have achieved shorter sensor-to-decision time. We suggest that military organizations can learn important lessons about information sharing from special operations forces headquarters—especially from their management of the human dimension of information sharing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See NATO (2009).

  2. 2.

    For instance, the poorly executed covert observation by a conventional unit of a person indicted for war crimes might see this individual leave the area of responsibility altogether and thus prevent his arrest. Of course, SOF also make mistakes, but the risk is smaller since they are better trained and possess special equipment and employ special procedures.

  3. 3.

    The case study is based on informal observations made by the second author between June and December 2013 as a member of the HQ.

References

  • Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ardichvili, A., Page, V., & Wentling, T. (2003). Motivation and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge-sharing communities of practice. Journal of Knowledge Management, 7(1), 64–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilo, T., & Weuts, J. (2013). Special forces. Revue Militaire Belge, 7(December), 91–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bisig, E., Hof, T., Valaker, S., Tresch, T. S., Seiler, S., & Bjornstad, A. L. (2012). Theoretical framework and model. In Y. Yanakiev & J. S. Horton (Eds.), Improving organisational effectiveness of coalition operations (pp. 3-1–3-17). RTO-TR-HFM-163 AC/323(HFM-163)TP/476. Neuilly-Sur-Seine, France: NATO STO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, S. D. N., & Yanow, D. (1993). Culture and organizational learning. Journal of Management Inquiry, 2, 373–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, A. C. (2003). Work team trust and effectiveness. Personnel Review, 32, 605–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danielsen, T. (2015). Making warriors in the global era. An anthropological study of institutional apprenticeship: Selection, training, education, and everyday life in the Norwegian Naval Special Operations Commando. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delhey, J., Newton, K., & Welzel, C. (2011). How general is trust in “most people”? Solving the radius trust problem. American Sociological Review, 76(5), 786–807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deresky, H. (2002). International management: Managing across borders and cultures (4th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (1999). The great disruption. Human nature and the reconstitution of social order. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. H. (1987). Organizations: Structures, processes and outcomes (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, B. (2004). When cultures collide: The conventional military/SOF chasm. Canadian Military Journal, (Autumn), 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, K. M., Yeung, D., Baiocchi D., & Welser, W. (2013). Facilitating information sharing across the international space community: Lessons from the behavioral sciences. RAND Corporation. Retrieved from http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR1255.html

  • McChrystal, S. (2013). My share of the task: A memoir. New York, NY: Portfolio Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moelker, R., Soeters, J., & Vom Hagen, U. (2007). Sympathy, the cement of interoperability. Armed Forces & Society, 33(4), 496–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NATO. (2009). Allied Joint Publication—3.5, Allied Joint Doctrine for Special Operations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pheysey, D. C. (1993). Organizational cultures: Types and transformations. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1996). What is strategy? Harvard Business Review, 74(6), 61–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resteigne, D. (2012). Le militaire en opérations multinationales. Regards croisés en Afghanistan, en Bosnie et au Liban. Bruxelles: Bruylant.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resteigne, D. (2015). Punching above their weight: The Belgian Special Forces (unpublished manuscript).

    Google Scholar 

  • Resteigne, D., & Blais, A. -R. (2014). The impact of cultural dimensions and the role of people in the organization: Leadership, training and rotation practices. In G. S. Rakovski (Ed.), Improving organizational effectiveness of coalition headquarters (pp. 47–65; 76–91). Sofia: Defence Advanced Research Institute, National Defence Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, G. (1906). The sociology of secrecy of secret societies. American Journal of Sociology, 11(4), 441–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smircich, L. (1983). Concepts of culture and organisational analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 339–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. (2006). The utility of force: The art of war in the modern world. London: Penguin Book.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soeters, J. (2008). Ambidextrous military: Coping with contradictions of new security policies. In M. den Boer & J. de Wilde (Eds.), The viability of human security (pp. 109–123). Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soeters, J., & Tresch, T. S. (2010). Towards cultural integration in multinational peace operations. Defence Studies, 10, 272–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1985). Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1448–1467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storr, J. (2001). A year observing command and control. British Army Review, 127, 3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittenbaum, G. M., & Bowman, J. M. (2004). A social validation explanation for mutual enhancement. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 169–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittenbaum, G. M., Hollingshead, A. B., & Botero, I. C. (2004). From cooperative to motivated information sharing in groups: Moving beyond the hidden profile paradigm. Communication Monographs, 71(3), 286–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Delphine Resteigne .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Resteigne, D., Van den Bogaert, S. (2017). Information Sharing in Contemporary Operations: The Strength of SOF Ties. In: Goldenberg, I., Soeters, J., Dean, W. (eds) Information Sharing in Military Operations. Advanced Sciences and Technologies for Security Applications. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42819-2_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics