Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Great Lakes, Water Quality and Water Policy in Canada

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Water Policy and Governance in Canada

Part of the book series: Global Issues in Water Policy ((GLOB,volume 17))

Abstract

This chapter focuses on water policy in the Great Lakes region to illustrate the complexities of transboundary, multi-level water governance and policy regimes in Canada. The chapter begins with an introduction of the Great Lakes as a natural resource that provides multiple ecological and human uses. The evolution of policy challenges and responses are introduced along with the various policy stakeholders. The second section reviews the transboundary water policy regime that has evolved to govern this complex system with a particular emphasis on water quality and the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement. The third section focuses on analyzing what the Great Lakes case illustrates about water policy in Canada from a historical and comparative perspective. The focus in this section is on answering two key questions: How does the Great Lakes case help us understand water policy in Canada and how does this regional transboundary water policy regime impact water policy in Canada? The final section of the chapter focuses on the lessons and insights that can be drawn from the case of the Great Lakes for water policy in Canada and beyond.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Austin, J., Bradely, J., & Vey, J. (2010). The next economy: Economic recovery and transformation in the Great Lakes region. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, K., & Cook, C. (2011). Water governance in Canada: Innovation in the context of fragmentation. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 27(2), 275–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bocking, S. (2006, June). Scientific expertise and environmental politics: Cross-border contrasts. Paper presented at the Canadian Political Science annual conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Botts, L., & Muldoon, P. (2005). Evolution of the Great Lakes water quality agreement. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, D. R. (2003). ‘Water’ in unnatural law: Rethinking Canadian environmental law and policy (pp. 13–53). Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, S. (2003). Water Policy. In S. Brooks & L. Miljan (Eds.), Public policy in Canada: An introduction (pp. 262–279). Toronto: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, S. (2010). The International Joint Commission: Convergence, divergence or submergence? In S. Brooks, B. Rabe (Eds.), Environmental governance on the 49th parallel: New century, new approaches (pp. 16–32). Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Centre. http://wilsoncenter.org/topics/pubs/IJC%20FINAL.pdf

  • Canada, Office of the Auditor General, Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development. (2001a). A legacy worth protecting: Charting a sustainable course in the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River basin. In Report of the commissioner of the environment and sustainable development. Office of the Auditor General. Minister of Public Works and Government Services, Ottawa, pp. 301–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Canada, Office of the Auditor General, Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development. (2001b). The International Joint Commission: A key binational organization. http://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/internet/docs/c101sec8e.pdf

  • Canada, Office of the Auditor General. (2000). Report of the commissioner of the environment and sustainable development. Ottawa: Office of the Auditor General of Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canada, Standing Senate Committee on Energy, the Environment and Natural Resources. (2005). Report on Federal Water Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, L. K. (1994). Disharmony in the Great Lakes Basin: Institutional jurisdictions frustrate the ecosystem approach. Alternatives, 20(3), 26–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson, S. (2008). Transboundary water governance. In Does North America exist? Governing the continent after NAFTA and 9/11 (pp. 138–162). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colborn, T., Davidson, A., Green, S., Hodge, R. A., Jackson, C. I., & Liroff, R. A. (1990). Great lakes, great legacy? Washington, DC/Ottawa: Conservation Foundation/Institute for Research on Public Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Environment Canada. (2015). Great Lakes areas of concern. http://www.ec.gc.ca/raps-pas/

  • Francis, G. (1987). Toward understanding Great Lakes “organizational ecosystems”. Journal of Great Lakes Research, 13, 233–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, K., & Foster, K. (2011). Environmental collaboration: Lessons learned about cross boundary collaborations. IBM Centre for the Business of Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Great Lakes Information Network. (2006). Water pollution in the Great Lakes. www.greatlakes.net/teach/pollution

  • Great Lakes United. (2007). The Great Lakes blueprint: A Canadian vision for protecting and restoring the Great Lakes and the St. Lawrence River ecosystem. Toronto: Environmental Defence Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greitens, T. J., Strachan, C. J., & Welton, C. S. (2012). The importance of multi-level governance participation in the ‘Great Lakes areas of concern’. In I. Roberge, D. Jesuit, & D. Cepiku (Eds.), Making multi-level public management work: Cases from the EU and North America. New York: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grover, V., & Krantzberg, G. (2015). Transboundary water management: Lesson learnt from North America. Water International, 40(1), 183–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, N. D. (2007). The evolving role of citizens in United States-Canadian international environmental law compliance. PACE Environmental Law Review, 24, 131–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartig, J. H., & Zarrell, Z. (1992). Under RAPs. Ann Arbour: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinmiller, B. T. (2003). Harmonization through emulation: Federalism and water export policy in Canada. Canadian Public Administration, 46(4), 495–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinmiller, B. T. (2007). Do intergovernmental institutions matter? The case of water diversion regulation in the Great Lakes basin. Governance, 20(4), 655–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C., Furlong, K., Bakker, K., & Cohen, A. (2007). A survey of water governance legislation and policies in the provinces and territories. In K. Bakker (Ed.), Eau Canada: The future of Canada’s water (pp. 370–376). Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoberg, G. (1992). Comparing Canadian performance in environmental policy. In R. Boardman (Ed.), Canadian environmental policy: Ecosystems, politics and process (pp. 246–262). Toronto: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howlett, M. (1994). The judicialization of Canadian environmental policy, 1980–1990: A test of the Canada-United States convergence thesis. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 27, 99–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Joint Commission. (1997). The IJC and the 21st century: Response of the IJC to a request by the governments of Canada and the United States for proposals on how to best assist them to meet the environmental challenges of the 21st century. www.ijc.org

  • International Joint Commission. (2006). Advice to the government on their review of the Great Lakes water quality agreement. A special report to the governments of Canada and the United States.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Joint Commission. (2011, October). Assessment of progress made towards restoring and maintaining Great Lakes water quality since 1987. (Draft Report).

    Google Scholar 

  • International Joint Commission. (2013). Sixteen Biennial report on the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Joint Commission. (2016). 2015 Binational great lakes basin poll. http://ijc.org/files/tinymce/uploaded/WQB/WQB_GreatLakesPollReport_March2016.pdf

  • Johns, C. (2000). Non-point source water pollution management in Canada and the US: A comparative analysis of institutional arrangements and policy instruments. Dissertation, McMaster University, Hamilton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johns, C. (2009). Water pollution in the Great Lakes basin: The global-local dynamic. In C. Gore & P. Stoett (Eds.), Environmental challenges and opportunities: Local-global perspectives on Canadian issues (pp. 95–129). Toronto: Emond Montgomery.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johns, C. (2010). Transboundary water pollution efforts in the Great Lakes: The significance of national and sub-national policy capacity. In B. Rabe & S. Brooks (Eds.), Environmental governance on the 49th parallel: New century, new approaches (pp. 63–82). Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Canada Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johns, C. (2014). The significance of networks in understanding governance & public administration: Using social network analysis to analyze governance and policy implementation challenges in the Great Lakes Region. Paper presented at the Canadian Political Science Association Annual Meeting, May 28, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johns, C., & Sproule-Jones, M. (2015). Water policy in Canada and the Great Lakes case. In D. VanNijnatten & R. Boardman (Eds.), Environmental policy in Canada (4th ed.). Toronto: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johns, C., & Thorn, A. (2015). Subnational diplomacy in the Great Lakes region: Toward explaining variation between water quantity and quality regimes. Canadian Foreign Policy Journal, 21(3), 195–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kavcic, R. (2015). North America’s economic engine. Bank of Montreal Special Report

    Google Scholar 

  • Krantzberg, G. (2011). Renegotiating the 1987 Great Lakes water quality agreement: From confusion to promise. Paper presented at the 1st World Sustainability Form. www.wsforum.org

  • Krantzberg, G., & Manno, J. (2010). Renovation and innovation: It’s time for the Great Lakes regime to respond. Water Resources Management, 24, 4273–4285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linton, J., & Hall, N. (2013). The Great Lakes: A model of Transboundary Cooperation. In E. Norman, A. Cohen, & K. Bakker (Eds.), Water without borders? Canada, the United States and shared waters (pp. 221–246). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maack, E., Mills, S., Borick, C., Gore, C., Rabe, B., & Great Lakes Policy Research Network (GLRPN). (2014). Environmental policy in the Great Lakes region: Current issues and public opinion. http://www.greatlakespolicyresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Public-Opinion-and-Enviromental-Policy-in-the-Great-Lakes-Region.pdf

  • MacFarlane, D. (2015). Subnational diplomacy and the Great Lakes St. Lawrence Seaway. Canadian Foreign Policy Journal, 21(3), 212–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGregor, D. (2012). Traditional knowledge: Considerations for protecting water in Ontario. The International Indigenous Policy Journal, 3(3), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGregor, D. (2014). Lessons for collaboration involving traditional knowledge and environmental governance in Ontario, Canada. AlterNATIVE. An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples, 10(4), 340–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, C., & Krantzberg, G. (2011). An appraisal of policy implementation deficits in the Great Lakes. Journal of Great Lakes Research, 37, 390–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, B. (2016). The hydrological and policy contexts for water in Canada. In S. Renzetti, D. Dupont (Eds.), Water policy & Governance in Canada. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, E. S. (2015). Governing transboundary waters: Canada, the United States and Indigenous Communities. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, E., & Bakker, K. (2015). Do good fences make good neighbors? Canada-United States Transboundary Water Governance, the Boundary Waters Treaty, and 21st century challenges. Water International, 40(1), 199–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman, E., & Bakker, K. (2016). Transcending borders through postcolonial water governance? Indigenous water governance across the Canada-US border. In S. Renzetti, D. Dupont (Eds.), Water policy and governance. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, E., & Karen, B. (2010). Governing water across the Canada-US Borderland. In M. Gattinger & G. Hale (Eds.), Borders and bridges: Canada’s policy relations in North America (pp. 194–212). Toronto: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, E., Cohen, A., & Bakker, K. (Eds.). (2013). Water without borders? The future of Canada-US Transboundary Water Governance. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phare, M.-A. (2013). Indigenous peoples and water: Governing across borders. In E. Norman, A. Cohen, & K. Bakker (Eds.), Water without borders? The future of Canada-US Transboundary Water Governance (pp. 27–46). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabe, B. G. (1999). Federalism and entrepreneurship: Explaining American and Canadian innovation in pollution prevention and regulatory integration. Policy Studies Journal, 27(2), 288–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabe, B. G., & Zimmerman, J. B. (1995). Beyond environmental regulatory fragmentation: Signs of integration in the case of the Great Lakes basin. Governance, 8(1), 58–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rashidi, M. (2014). Indigenous peoples and the Great Lakes, Great Lakes policy research network policy brief. http://www.greatlakespolicyresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/Indigenous-Peoples-and-the-Great-Lakes-Policy-Brief.pdf

  • Royal Bank of Canada. (2016). RBC Canadian water attitudes study. http://www.rbc.com/community-sustainability/environment/rbc-blue-water/water-attitude-study.html

  • Schwartz, A. M. (2005). The Canada-US environmental relationship: Calm waters but slow sailing. International Journal, 60(2), 437–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SOLEC. (2011). State of the lakes ecosystem conference report. http://binational.net/solec/sogl2011/sogl-2011-technical-report-en.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sproule-Jones, M. H. (2002a). Institutional experiments in the restoration of the North American Great Lakes environment. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 35(4), 835–857.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sproule-Jones, M. H. (2002b). Restoration of the Great Lakes: Promises, practices, performance. Vancouver: UBC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sproule-Jones, M., Johns, C., & Heinmiller, B. T. (Eds.). (2008). Water politics in Canada: Conflicts and institutions. Montreal/Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • US, EPA. (2007). National water quality report to congress. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-09/documents/2007_10_15_305b_2002report_report2002305b.pdf

  • US, EPA. (2014). Great Lakes legacy act. https://www.epa.gov/great-lakes-legacy-act/about-great-lakes-legacy-act

  • US, EPA (2015). Great Lakes restoration initiative report to congress and the president 2010–2014. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-09/documents/21050720-report_to_congress-2.pdf

  • United States Environmental Protection Agency. (1995). EPA progress report. Washington, DC: Environmental Protection Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • VanNijnatten, D. L. (2006). Towards cross-border environmental policy spaces in North America: Province-state linkages on the Canada-U.S. Border. AmeriQuests: The Journal of the Center for the Americas, 3(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • VanNijnatten, D., Johns, C., Friedman, K., & Krantzberg, G. (2016). Transboundary governance capacity in the Great Lakes basin. International Journal of Water Governance, 4(1), 7–32.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Politics and Public Administration, Ryerson University, 350 Victoria Street, Toronto, ON, M5B 2K3, Canada

    Carolyn M. Johns

Authors
  1. Carolyn M. Johns
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carolyn M. Johns .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Economics and Environmental Sustainability Research Centre, Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada

    Steven Renzetti

  2. Department of Economics and Environmental Sustainability Research Centre, Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada

    Diane P. Dupont

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Johns, C.M. (2017). The Great Lakes, Water Quality and Water Policy in Canada. In: Renzetti, S., Dupont, D. (eds) Water Policy and Governance in Canada. Global Issues in Water Policy, vol 17. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42806-2_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation