Abstract
In this chapter, I comment on the ten aspects listed by Roger Smith to show the usefulness of historical research in psychology. Thereby, I characterize and evaluate different historiographic trends. History should be seen as a way of acquiring perspective, and it should offer a conceptual tool for comparison between different epistemological approaches. It is also instrumental in analysis of the social dynamics involved in knowledge construction. In general, therefore, a connection between the history of psychology and the broader field of the history of science seems fruitful.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Boring, E. G. (1950). A history of experimental psychology. New York: Appleton.
Carr, E. H. (1961). What is history? London: Macmillan.
Foucault, M. (1961). Folie et déraison: Histoire de la folie à l’âge classique. Paris: Union Générale d’Éditions.
Foucault, M. (1969). L’Archéologie du savoir. Paris: Gallimard.
Foucault, M. (1991). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. London: Penguin.
Gavroglu, K., et al. (2008). Science and technology in the European periphery: Some historiographical reflections. History of Science, 46, 153–175.
Gould, S. (1981). The mismeasure of man. New York: W. W. Norton.
Hall, G. S. (1912). The founders of modern psychology. New York: Appleton.
Misiak, H., & Staut, V. (1955). Catholics in psychology: A historical survey. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Mülberger, A. (2014). The need for contextual approaches to the history of mental testing. History of Psychology, 17(3), 177–186.
Mülberger, A. (2016). Foreword. In S. de Freitas Araujo (Ed.), Wundt and the philosophical foundations of psychology (pp. vii–ix). New York: Springer.
Mülberger, A. & Sturm, T. (Eds.) (2012). Special issue, Psychology, a science in crisis? A century of reflections and debates. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 43.
Nicolas, S., & Thompson, P. (2015). The Hipp chronoscope versus the D’Arsonval chronometer. History of Psychology, 18, 367–384.
Pestre, D. (2005). Ciencia, dinero y política: Ensayo de interpretación. Buenos Aires: Nueva Visión.
Pickren, W., & Rutherford, A. (2010). A history of modern psychology in context. New York: Wiley.
Raj, K. (2013). Beyond postcolonialism… And postpositivism: Circulation of the global history of science. Isis, 104(2), 337–347.
Romand, D. (2015). Theodor Waitz’s theory of feelings and the rise of affective sciences in the mid-19th century. History of Psychology, 18(4), 385–400.
Rose, N. (1991). Governing the soul: The shaping of the private self. London: Routledge.
Rose, N. (1998). Inventing our selves: Psychology, power, and personhood. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Said, E. (1993). Culture and imperialism. New York: Knopf.
Secord, J. A. (2004). Knowledge in transit. Isis, 95(4), 654–672.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mülberger, A. (2016). Commentary 1: Functions and Trends in the History of Psychology. In: Klempe, S., Smith, R. (eds) Centrality of History for Theory Construction in Psychology . Annals of Theoretical Psychology, vol 14. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42760-7_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42760-7_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-42759-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-42760-7
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)