Abstract
In this chapter we set out a theoretical framework to consider the relational complexity of serodiscordance and to critique the biomedical deployment of serodiscordance and its socio-legal effects. Specifically, we draw on the relational approach to bodies, technology and place articulated in Karen Barad’s agential realism. This analysis will consider the practice and narratives of healthcare providers in a specialist clinic and the narratives of patients who were, or had been, in (assumed) serodiscordant relationships. The data this chapter is premised on were collected during a broader qualitative investigation of an HIV specialist antenatal clinic in London, which explored the multifarious requirements of the successful prevention of mother-to-child (vertical) transmission of HIV. We argue that contrary to its deployment within biomedicine, serodiscordance is an intricate entanglement of virus, body and power. We demonstrate that serodiscordance emerges in the clinic not only as a material-discursive phenomenon, but a phenomenon that is multiple. We explore three aspects of serodiscordance as a phenomenal multiplicity, which we have termed: violent, temporal and diasporic. In conclusion we consider how HIV as a multiplicity unsettles the biomedical notion of serodiscordance.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
“The real” is a concept we have taken from feminist theory in which it is used to articulate materiality as it appears (and is imagined) to exist prior to discourse (see for instance Butler 1994). The concept is at the heart of Karen Barad’s agential real ism and has been adopted by Marsha Rosengarten (2009).
References
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.
Barad, K. (2012). Nature’s queer performativity. Kvinder, Kon & Forskning, 1(2), 25–53.
Butler, J. (1994). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of “sex”. New York/London: Routledge.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC]. (2012). HIV among pregnant women, infants, and children in the United States. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/risk_WIC.pdf. Accessed 1 July 2015.
de Ruiter, A., Taylor, G. P., Clayden, P., Dhar, J., Gandhi, K., Gilleece, Y., et al. (2014). British HIV Association guidelines for the management of HIV infection in pregnant women 2012 (2014 interim review). HIV Medicine, 15(S4), 1–77.
de Wit, J. B. F., Aggleton, P., Myers, T., & Crewe, M. (2011). The rapidly changing paradigm of HIV prevention: Time to strengthen social and behavioural approaches. Health Education Research, 26(3), 381–392.
Dodds, C., Weatherburn, P., Hickson, F., Keogh, P., & Nutland, W. (2005). Grevious harm? Use of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861 for sexual transmission of HIV. Sigma Research, http://www.sigmaresearch.org.uk/downloads/report05b.pdf. Accessed 25 June 2015.
Doyal, L., & Anderson, J. (2005). “My fear is to fall in love again”: How HIV positive African women survive in London. Social Science & Medicine, 60(8), 1729–1738.
Flowers, P., Davis, M., Hart, G., Rosengarten, M., Frankis, J., & Imrie, J. (2006). Diagnosis and stigma and identity amongst HIV positive Black Africans living in the UK. Psychology & Health, 21(1), 109–122.
Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS [UNAIDS]. (2012). Global report: UNAIDS report on the global AIDS epidemic. UNAIDS. http://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/media_asset/20121120_UNAIDS_Global_Report_2012_with_annexes_en_1.pdf. Accessed 28 Oct 2015.
Kalichman, S. C., DiMarco, M., Austin, J., Luke, W., & DiFonzo, K. (2003). Stress, social support, and HIV-status disclosure to family and friends among HIV-positive men and women. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 26(4), 315–332.
McKnight, U., & van der Zaag, A. (2015). When debility provides a future: Preventing vertical transmission of HIV. Feminist Review, 111, 124–139.
Mol, A. (2002). The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice. Durham/London: Duke University Press.
Nguyen, V. K., Bajos, N., Dubois-Arber, F., O’Malley, J., & Pirkle, C. M. (2011). Remedicalizing an epidemic: From HIV treatment as prevention to HIV treatment is prevention. AIDS, 25(3), 291–293.
Persson, A. (2013). Non/infectious corporealities: Tensions in the biomedical era of “HIV normalisation”. Sociology of Health & Illness, 35(7), 1065–1079.
Race, K. (2001). The undetectable crisis: Changing technologies of risk. Sexualities, 4(2), 167–189.
Rosengarten, M. (2009). HIV interventions: Biomedicine and the traffic between information and flesh (In vivo: The cultural mediations of biomedical science). Seattle/London: University of Washington Press.
The Body. (2012). Couples with mixed HIV status. The Body: The Complete HIV/AIDS Resource. http://www.thebody.com/content/art55344.html?ic=4001. Accessed 17 July 2015.
Yin, Z., Brown, A. E., Hughes, G., Nardone, A., Gill, O. N., Delpech, V. C., & contributors. (2014). HIV in the United Kingdom 2014 Report: Data to end 2013. London: Public Health England.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
van der Zaag, AC., McKnight, U. (2017). Exploring the Relational Complexity of Serodiscordance: Negotiating Violence, Temporality and Diaspora. In: Persson, A., Hughes, S. (eds) Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Couples with Mixed HIV Status: Beyond Positive/Negative. Social Aspects of HIV, vol 2. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42725-6_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42725-6_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-42723-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-42725-6
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)