Skip to main content

Communication in Human-Agent Teams for Tasks with Joint Action

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Coordination, Organizations, Institutions, and Norms in Agent Systems XI (COIN 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 9628))

Abstract

In many scenarios, humans must team with agents to achieve joint aims. When working collectively in a team of human and artificial agents, communication is important to establish a shared situation of the task at hand. With no human in the loop and little cost for communication, information about the task can be easily exchanged. However, when communication becomes expensive, or when there are humans in the loop, the strategy for sharing information must be carefully designed: too little information leads to lack of shared situation awareness, while too much overloads the human team members, decreasing performance overall. This paper investigates the effects of sharing beliefs and goals in agent teams and in human-agent teams. We performed a set of experiments using the BlocksWorlds for Teams (BW4T) testbed to assess different strategies for information sharing. In previous experimental studies using BW4T, explanations about agent behaviour were shown to have no effect on team performance. One possible reason for this is because the existing scenarios in BW4T contained joint tasks, but not joint actions. That is, atomic actions that required interdependent and simultaneous action between more than one agent. We implemented new scenarios in BW4T in which some actions required two agents to complete. Our results showed an improvement in artificial-agent team performance when communicating goals and sharing beliefs, but with goals contributing more to team performance, and that in human-agent teams, communicating only goals was more effective than communicating both goals and beliefs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Artificial agents are also programmed with this capability in our model.

References

  1. Bradshaw, J.M., Feltovich, P., Johnson, M., Breedy, M., Bunch, L., Eskridge, T., Jung, H., Lott, J., Uszok, A., van Diggelen, J.: From tools to teammates: joint activity in human-agent-robot teams. In: Kurosu, M. (ed.) HCD 2009. LNCS, vol. 5619, pp. 935–944. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Cannon-Bowers, J.A., Salas, E.: Reflections on shared cognition. J. Organ. Behav. 22(2), 195–202 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Clark, H.: Using Language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Cummings, M.M.: Man versus machine or man + machine? IEEE Intell. Syst. 29(5), 62–69 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Harbers, M., Bradshaw, J.M., Johnson, M., Feltovich, P., van den Bosch, K., Meyer, J.-J.: Explanation and coordination in human-agent teams: a study in the BW4T testbed. In: Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE International Conferences on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology, pp. 17–20. IEEE Computer Society (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Harbers, M., Bradshaw, J.M., Johnson, M., Feltovich, P., van den Bosch, K., Meyer, J.-J.: Explanation in human-agent teamwork. In: Cranefield, S., van Riemsdijk, M.B., Vázquez-Salceda, J., Noriega, P. (eds.) COIN 2011. LNCS, vol. 7254, pp. 21–37. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Harbers, M., Jonker, C., Van Riemsdijk, B.: Enhancing team performance through effective communication. In: Proceedings of the 4th Annual Human-Agent-Robot Teamwork Workshop, pp. 1–2 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hindriks, K.V.: Programming rational agents in GOAL. In: El Fallah Seghrouchni, A., Dix, J., Dastani, M., Bordini, R.H. (eds.) Multi-Agent Programming, pp. 119–157. Springer, New York (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Johnson, M., Bradshaw, J.M., Feltovich, P.J., Jonker, C.M., van Riemsdijk, B., Sierhuis, M.: The fundamental principle of coactive design: interdependence must shape autonomy. In: De Vos, M., Fornara, N., Pitt, J.V., Vouros, G. (eds.) COIN 2010. LNCS, vol. 6541, pp. 172–191. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Johnson, M., Bradshaw, J.M., Feltovich, P.J., Jonker, C.M., Van Riemsdijk, M.B.: Coactive design: designing support for interdependence in joint activity. J. Hum.-Robot Interact. 3, 43–69 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Johnson, M., Jonker, C., van Riemsdijk, B., Feltovich, P.J., Bradshaw, J.M.: Joint activity testbed: blocks world for teams (BW4T). In: Aldewereld, H., Dignum, V., Picard, G. (eds.) ESAW 2009. LNCS, vol. 5881, pp. 254–256. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Kashima, Y., Klein, O., Clark, A.E.: Grounding: sharing information in social interaction. In: Fiedler, K. (ed.) Social Communication, pp. 27–77. Psychology Press, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Langan-Fox, J., Canty, J.M., Sankey, M.J.: Human-automation teams and adaptable control for future air traffic management. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 39(5), 894–903 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Puranam, P., Raveendran, M., Knudsen, T.: Organization design: the epistemic interdependence perspective. Acad. Manag. Rev. 37(3), 419–440 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Saavedra, R., Earley, P.C., Van Dyne, L.: Complex interdependence in task-performing groups. J. Appl. Psychol. 78(1), 61–72 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Salas, E., Prince, C., Baker, D.P., Shrestha, L.: Situation awareness in team performance: implications for measurement and training. Hum. Factors: J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. 37(1), 123–136 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Singh, R., Miller, T., Sonenberg, L.: A preliminary analysis of interdependence in multiagent systems. In: Dam, H.K., Pitt, J., Xu, Y., Governatori, G., Ito, T. (eds.) PRIMA 2014. LNCS, vol. 8861, pp. 381–389. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stubbs, K., Wettergreen, D., Hinds, P.J.: Autonomy and common ground in human-robot interaction: a field study. IEEE Intell. Syst. 22(2), 42–50 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wei, C., Hindriks, K., Jonker, C.M.: The role of communication in coordination protocols for cooperative robot teams. In: International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence, pp. 28–39 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Christian Muise for his valuable feedback on drafts of this paper. This research is partially funded by Australian Research Council Discovery Grant DP130102825: Foundations of Human-Agent Collaboration: Situation-Relevant Information Sharing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tim Miller .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Li, S., Sun, W., Miller, T. (2016). Communication in Human-Agent Teams for Tasks with Joint Action. In: Dignum, V., Noriega, P., Sensoy, M., Sichman, J. (eds) Coordination, Organizations, Institutions, and Norms in Agent Systems XI. COIN 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9628. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42691-4_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42691-4_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-42690-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-42691-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics