Abstract
In this introductory chapter, I present the research question of the book and situate it in the literature. The objective of the book is to examine under which conditions interest groups shape policy outcomes in the European Parliament (EP). Even though the EP has become an increasingly important lobbying venue in Brussels due to the expansion of its powers, researchers have paid little attention to how lobbying in the EP plays out. For a long time, the EP has had a reputation as a champion of diffuse interests. This contrasts with the interest group literature’s assumption of a business bias in politics. It is, therefore, time to gain a more nuanced understanding of interest group influence in the EP. The chapter also presents the book’s key concepts, case selection, and methods.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Austen-Smith, D., & Wright, J. R. (1994). Counteractive lobbying. American Journal for Political Science, 38(1), 25–44.
Bachrach, P., & Baratz, M. S. (1969). Two faces of power. In W. E. Connolly (Ed.), The bias of pluralism. New York: Atherton Press.
Barry, B. (1980a). Is it better to be powerful or lucky? Part 1. Political Studies, 28(2), 183–194.
Barry, B. (1980b). Is it better to be powerful than lucky? Part 2. Political Studies, 28(3), 338–352.
Berkhout, J. (2015). Change and continuity in the composition of the lobby community in the European Union: Lobby explosion and lobby tourism. In S. Shotton & P. G. Nixon (Eds.), Lobbying the European Union. Changing minds, changing time. Burlington: Ashgate. Ch. 1.
Beyers, J. (2004). Voice and access. Political practices of European interest associations. European Union Politics, 5(2), 211–240.
Biersteker, T. J. (1995). Constructing historical counterfactuals to assess the consequences of international regimes. In V. Rittberger (Ed.), Regime theory and international. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Ch.13.
Bouwen, P. (2004a). Exchanging access goods for access: A comparative study of business lobbying in the European Union institutions. European Journal of Political Research, 43(3), 337–369.
Bouwen, P. (2004b). The logic of access to the European Parliament: Business lobbying in the committee on economic and monetary affairs. Journal of Common Market Studies, 42(3), 473–495.
Bunea, A. (2013). Issues, preferences and ties: Determinants of interest groups’ preference attainment in the EU environmental policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(4), 552–570.
Bunea, A. (2014). Explaining interest groups’ articulation of policy preferences in the European Commission’s open consultations. An analysis of the environmental policy area. Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(6), 1224–1241.
Bunea, A. (2015). Evaluating pluralism: Interest groups’ policy demands and lobbying success in the European Commission’s open consultations. A case study in environmental policy. In P. S. Shotton & P. G. Nixon (Eds.), Lobbying the European Union. Changing minds, changing time. Burlington: Ashgate. Ch. 3.
Burns, C. (2005). The European Parliament: The EU’s environmental champion? In A. G. Jordan (Ed.), Environmental policy in the European Union. Actors, institutions & processes (2nd ed.). London: Earthscan. Ch. 8.
Chalmers, A.W. (2013). Trading information for access: informational lobbying strategies and interest group access to the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(1), 39-58.
Coen, D. and Richardson, J., eds.(2009b). Lobbying the European Union: Institutions, Actors and Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dahl, R. A. (1958). A critique of the ruling Elite model. The American Political Science Review, 58(2), 463–469.
Dür, A. (2008). Measuring interest group influence in the EU: A note on methodology. European Union Politics, 9(4), 559–576.
Eising, R. (2007). Institutional context, organizational resources and strategic choices: Explaining interest group access in the European Union. European Union Politics, 8(3), 329–362.
European Parliament. (2014b). Codecision and conciliation. A guide to how the European Parliament co-legislates under the ordinary legislative procedure. Brussels: European Parliament.
Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge. Sussex: Harvester Press.
George, A. L., & Bennett, A. (2004). Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Giddens, A. (1986). The constitution of society. Oxford: Polity Press.
Grant, W. (1989). Pressure groups, politics and democracy in Britain. Hempstead: Phillip Allan.
Greenwood, J. (2011). Interest representation in the European Union (3rd ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hermansson, H. (2015). Privileged access to the European Commission’s stakeholder consultations. In P. S. Shotton & P. G. Nixon (Eds.), Lobbying the European Union. Changing minds, changing time. Burlington: Ashgate. Ch. 6.
Hix, S., & Høyland, B. (2011). The political system of the European Union (3rd ed.). London: Palgrave.
Klüver, H. (2013). Lobbying in the European Union. Interest groups, lobbying coalitions, and policy change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lehmann, W. (2009). The European Parliament. In D. Coen & J. Richardson (Eds.), Lobbying the European Union. Institutions, actors, and issues. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lindblom, C. (1977). Politics and markets. New York: Basic Books. Ch. 3.
Loomis, B. A. (1983). A new era: Groups and the grassroots. In A. J. Cigler & B. A. Loomis (Eds.), Interest group politics (pp. 169–190). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
Lukes, S. (1974). Power: a radical view. London: Macmillan.
Marshall, D. (2010). Who to lobby and when. Institutional determinants of interest group strategies in European Parliament committees European Union Politics, 11(4), 553–575.
Marshall, D. (2015). Explaining interest group interactions with party group members in the European Parliament: Dominant party groups and coalition formation. Journal of Common Market Studies, 53(2), 311–329.
McElroy, G. (2006). Committee representation in the European Parliament. European Union Politics, 7(1), 5–29.
Panke, D. (2006). Lobbying Institutional Key Players: How States Seek to Influence the European Commission, the Council Presidency and the European Parliament. Journal of Common Market Studies, 50(1), 129–150.
Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Boston: Harvard University Press.
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource-dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.
Pollack, M. A. (1997). Representing diffuse interests in EC policy-making. Journal of European Public Policy, 4(4), 572–590.
Polsby, N. W. (1960). How to study community power: The pluralist alternative. Journal of Politics, 22(3), 474–484.
Rasmussen, M. K. (2015). The battle for influence: The politics of business lobbying in the European Parliament. Journal of Common Market Studies, 53(2), 365–382.
Rasmussen, A., & Gross, V. (2015). Biased access? Exploring selection to advisory committees. European Political Science Review, 7(3), 343–372.
Yordanova, N. (2011). Inter-institutional rules and the division of power in the European Parliament: Allocation of consultation and co-decision reports. West European Politics, 34(1), 97–121.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dionigi, M.K. (2017). Introduction. In: Lobbying in the European Parliament. Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42688-4_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42688-4_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-42687-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-42688-4
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)