Skip to main content

Explained Variation for Correlated Survival Data Under the Proportional Hazards Mixed-Effects Model

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Statistical Applications from Clinical Trials and Personalized Medicine to Finance and Business Analytics

Part of the book series: ICSA Book Series in Statistics ((ICSABSS))

  • 915 Accesses

Abstract

Measures of explained variation are useful in scientific research, as they quantify the amount of variation in an outcome variable of interest that is explained by one or more other variables. We develop such measures for correlated survival data, under the proportional hazards mixed-effects model (PHMM). Since different approaches have been studied in the literature outside the classical linear regression model, we investigate four sample-based measures that estimate three different population coefficients. We show that although the three population measures are not the same, they reflect similar amounts of variation explained by the predictors. Among the four sample-based measures, we show that the first one (R 2) which is the simplest to compute, is also consistent for the first population measure (\(\Omega ^{2}\)) under the usual asymptotic scenario when the number of clusters tends to infinity; the other three sample-based measures, on the other hand, all require that in addition the cluster sizes be large. We study the properties of the measures through simulation studies. We illustrate their usage on a multi-center clinical trial data set.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Xu R. Measuring explained variation in linear mixed effects models. Statistics in Medicine 2003; 22:3527–3541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sneider H, Boomsma DI, van Doornen LJP, Neale MC. Bivariate genetic analysis of fasting insulin and glucose levels. Genetic Epidemiology 1999; 16:426–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu I, Blacker DL, Xu R, Fitzmaurice G, Lyons MJ, Tsuang MT. Genetic and environmental contributions to the development of alcohol dependence in male twins. Archives of General Psychiatry 2004a; 61:897–903.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu I, Xu R, Blacker DL, Fitzmaurice G, Lyons MJ, Tsuang MT. The application of a random effects model to censored twin data. Behavior Genetics 2005; 35:781–789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kvalseth TO. Cautionary note about R 2. The American Statistician 1985; 39:279–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schemper M, Stare J. Explained variation in survival analysis. Statistics in Medicine 1996; 15:1999–2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schemper M, Kaider A. A new approach to estimate correlation coefficients in the presence of censoring and proportional hazards. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 1997; 23: 467–476.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Heller G. A measure of explained risk in the proportional hazards model. Biostatistics 2012; 13:315–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preseley A, Tilahun A, Alonso A, Molenberghs G. An information-theoretic approach to surrogate-marker evaluation with failure time endpoints. Lifetime Data Analysis 2011; 17:195–214.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • O’Quigley J, Xu R. Explained variation and explained randomness for proportional hazards models. Handbook of Statistics in Clinical Oncology (3rd Ed.), ed. Crowley and Hoering 2012;:487–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ripatti S, Palmgren J. Estimation of multivariate frailty models using penalized partial likelihood. Biometrics 2000; 56:1016–1022.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Vaida F, Xu R. Proportional hazards model with random effects. Statistics in Medicine 2000; 19:3309–3324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu R, Gamst A. On proportional hazards assumption under the random effects models. Lifetime Data Analysis 2007; 13:317–332.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Heagerty PJ, Zheng Y. Survival model predictive accuracy and ROC curves. Biometrics 2005; 61:92–105.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gamst A, Donohue M, Xu R. Asymptotic properties and empirical evaluation of the NPMLE in the proportional hazards mixed-effects model. Statistica Sinica 2009; 19:997–1011.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Vaida F, Blanchard S. Conditional Akaike information for mixed-effects models. Biometrika 2005; 92:351–370.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Donohue MC, Overholser R, Xu R, Vaida F. Conditional Akaike information under generalized linear and proportional hazards mixed models. Biometrika 2011; 98 (3):685–700. URL http://biomet.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/98/3/685.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeng D, Lin DY. Maximum likelihood estimation in semiparametric regression models with censored data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 2007; 69:507–564.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Liu I, Blacker DL, Xu R, Fitzmaurice G, Tsuang MT, Lyons MJ. Genetic and environmental contributions to age of onset of alcohol dependence symptoms in male twins. Addiction 2004b; 99:1403–1409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown GG, Rutemiller HC. Means and variances of stochastic vector products with applications to random linear models. Management Science 1977; 24 (2):210–216.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld DA. Partial residuals for the proportional hazards regression model. Biometrika 1982; 69:239–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Quigley J, Flandre P. Predictive capability of proportional hazards regression. Proc. of the National Academy of Science USA 1994; 91:2310–2314.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Huang J, Harrington D. Penalized partial likelihood regression for right-censored data with bootstrap selection of the penalty parameter. Biometrics 2002; 58:781–791.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kent JT. Information gain and a general measure of correlation. Biometrika 1983; 70:163–174.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kent JT, O’Quigley J. Measures of dependence for censored survival data. Biometrika 1988; 75:525–534.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Xu R, O’Quigley J. A R 2 measure of dependence for proportional hazards models. Nonparametric Statistics 1999; 12:83–107.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • O’Quigley J, Xu R, Stare J. Explained randomness in proportional hazards models. Statistics in Medicine 2005; 24:479–489.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cox DR, Snell EJ. The Analysis of Binary Data (2nd ed.). Chapman and Hall, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray R. Tests for variation over groups in survival data. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1995; 90:198–203.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Xu R, Vaida F, Harrington DP. Using profile likelihood for semiparametric model selection with application to proportional hazards mixed models. Statistica Sinica 2009; 19:819–842.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dunson DB, Chen Z. Selecting factors predictive of heterogeneity in multivariate event time data. Biometrics 2004; 60:352–358.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gray R. Correspondence (Re: Dunson and Chen, 2004). Biometrics 2006; 62:623–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee KE, Kim Y, Xu R. Bayesian variable selection under the proportional hazards mixed-effects model. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 2014; 75:53–65.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Honerkamp-Smith, G., Xu, R. (2016). Explained Variation for Correlated Survival Data Under the Proportional Hazards Mixed-Effects Model. In: Lin, J., Wang, B., Hu, X., Chen, K., Liu, R. (eds) Statistical Applications from Clinical Trials and Personalized Medicine to Finance and Business Analytics. ICSA Book Series in Statistics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42568-9_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics