Whose Knowledge, Whose Voice? Power, Agency and Resistance in Disability Studies for the Global South
Meekosha (2011) maintains that research and theories about disability derive mainly from the global North. Disability studies rarely include non-metropolitan thinkers. Even when it does, this research tends to be seen as context specific, and the social theories which emanate from these studies are rarely referred to in research theorizing disability in the North. This chapter sets out to investigate how this one-way transfer of knowledge affects the way disability studies is conceptualized—whose experiences are incorporated and whose are left out. Multilateral debate and dialogue between disability studies academics and activists in different locations around the world would help add to the knowledge already available in the field, while keeping others informed about what is taking place in ‘similar’ situations elsewhere.
KeywordsDisability research Power Agency Resistance Knowledge transfer Knowledge contestations Colonising research Neocolonialism
- Abu-Lughod, L. (1991). Writing against culture. In R. Fox (Ed.), Recapturing anthropology (pp. 137–162). Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
- Adjoe, C. (2007). Language policy and planning in Ghana: A monolingual ideology, ethos and discourses in a multilingual society? Unpublished PhD dissertation, London University.Google Scholar
- Alatas, S. F. (2003). Academic dependency and the global division of labour in the Social Sciences. Sociology, 51(6), 599–613.Google Scholar
- Barker, C. (2010). Interdisciplinary dialogues: Disability and postcolonial studies. Review of Disability Studies: An International Journal, 6(3), 15–24.Google Scholar
- Bloor, D. (1991). Knowledge and social imagery. Chicago: The Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
- Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble. Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Chetcuti, K. (2014, February 2). Half of 25-34 year-olds still living with parents. Timesofmalta.com. Retrieved April 6, 2014, from http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20140202/local/half-of-25-34-year-olds-still-living-with-parents.505083.
- Chiseri-Strater, E., & Stone Sunstein, B. S. (1997). Fieldworking: Reading and writing research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Cutajar, J. (2009). “Let me learn”. The use of Western derived epistemologies and in/dependence in Maltese classrooms. Paper presented during The First Malta International Forum on Learning, Dolmen Hotel, 25–29 June 2009.Google Scholar
- Ghosh, B. (1998). The postcolonial bazaar: Thoughts on teaching the market in postcolonial objects. Retrieved April 30, 2008, from http://jefferson.village.virginia.edu/pmc/text-only/issue.998/9.1ghosh.txt.
- Greenman, N. (1996). More than a mother. Some Tewa women reflect on Gia. In G. Etter-Lewis & M. Foster (Eds.), Unrelated kin. Race and gender in women’s personal narratives (pp. 49–67). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Hill Collins, P. (1991). Black feminist thought. Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Hiranandani, V. (2005). Towards a critical theory of disability in social work. Critical Social Work, 6(1). Retrieved September 9, 2013, from http://www1.uwindsor.ca/criticalsocialwork/towards-a-critical-theory-of-disability-in-social-work.
- Hondagneu-Sotelo, P. (1996). Immigrant women and paid domestic work. Research, theory and activism. In H. Gottfried (Ed.), Feminism and social change. Bridging theory and practice (pp. 105–122). Urbana: University of Illinois.Google Scholar
- John, M. E. (1989). Postcolonial feminists in the western intellectual field: Anthropologists and native informants. Inscriptions, 5, 49–73.Google Scholar
- Kaplan, C. (1994). The politics of location as transnational feminist practice. In I. Grewal & C. Kaplan (Eds.), Scattered hegemonies. Postmodern and transitional feminist practices (pp. 137–152). London: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
- Karthigesu, R. (1996). Mass media and cross cultural communication: Malaysian study. Interim Report. Singapore: AMIC.Google Scholar
- Lal, J. (1996). Situating locations: The politics of self, identity and ‘Other’ in living and writing the text. In D. L. Wolf (Ed.), Feminist dilemmas in fieldwork (pp. 185–214). Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
- Landry, D., & Maclean, G. (1996). The Spivak reader: Selected works of Gayati Chakravorty Spivak. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Lengermann, P. M., & Niebrugge, G. (2008). Contemporary feminist theory. In G. Ritzer (Ed.), Sociological theory (pp. 450–498). Boston: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.Google Scholar
- Mazrui, A. (1995). The ‘Other’ as the ‘Self’ under cultural dependency: The impact of the postcolonial university. In G. Brinker-Gabler (Ed.), Encountering the other(s) (pp. 333–362). Albany: Suny P.Google Scholar
- Miles, M. (2007). International strategies for disability—related work in developing countries: Historical, modern and critical reflections. Retrieved July 28, 2014, from http://www.independentliving.org/docs7/miles200701.pdf.
- Parekh, P. N. (2007). Gender, disability and the postcolonial nexus. Wagadu: Journal of Transnational Women’s and Gender Studies, 4, 142–161.Google Scholar
- Pennycook, A. (1994). The cultural politics of English as an international language. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
- Phoenix, A. (2012). De-colonising practices: Negotiating narratives from racialised and gendered experiences of education. In H. S. Mirza & C. Joseph (Eds.), Black and postcolonial feminisms in new times. Researching educational inequalities (pp. 101–114). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Pratt, M. L. (1992). Imperial eyes. Travel writing and transculturation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Rich, A. (2003). Notes towards a politics of location. In R. Lewis & S. Mills (Eds.), Feminist postcolonial theory: A reader (pp. 29–42). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
- Richardson, L., & St. Pierre, E. A. (2005). Writing: A method of inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 959–978). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Said, E. W. (1994). Culture and imperialism. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
- Soldatic, K., & Biyanwila, S. J. (2010). Tsunami and the southern disabled body. Global South: SEPHIS, 6(3), 75–84.Google Scholar
- Spiteri Gingell, D. (2011). Policy on independent supported living for disabled persons in Malta. St. Venera: Kummissjoni Nazzjonali Persuni b’Dizabilita’.Google Scholar
- Stone, E. (1999). Disability and development in the majority world. In E. Stone (Ed.), Disability and development: Learning from action and research on disability in the majority world (pp. 1–18). Leeds: The Disability Press.Google Scholar
- Tuhiwai Smith, L. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous people. London: Zed Books Ltd.Google Scholar
- Wendell, S. (1997). Towards a feminist theory of disability. In L. J. Davis (Ed.), The disability studies reader (pp. 260–278). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Wolf, D. L. (1996). Situating feminist dilemmas in fieldwork. In D. L. Wolf (Ed.), Feminist dilemmas in fieldwork (pp. 1–55). Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
- Yuval-Davis, N. (1997). Gender and Nation. London: Sage.Google Scholar