Advertisement

Disability and Poverty: Complex Interactions and Critical Reframings

  • Shaun GrechEmail author
Chapter
Part of the International Perspectives on Social Policy, Administration, and Practice book series (IPSPAP)

Abstract

The relationship between disability and poverty has been acknowledged with reasonable conviction in recent years. Various commentators have expressed how disability and poverty are bound together, one feeding into the other, a relationship typically presented as a mutually reinforcing cycle (World Health Organization and World Bank 2011). Within this discourse, sometimes supported by schematic representations, it is said that poverty exacerbates and/or intensifies impairment or vulnerability to it, while the barriers encountered by disabled people result in a greater chance of falling into or experiencing more intense poverty. As a result, disabled people are said to be among the poorest of the poor. The argument that impoverishment is what typifies many of these disabled lives, supports the efforts of those who insist that disability is not only relevant to, but cuts across international development policy, research and practice. This has come to be known as disability mainstreaming (see Chap.  1 in this volume, Grech 2016). The emphasis on the disability/poverty relationship has remained a strong linchpin in negotiations with the United Nations to get disability into the coveted Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and now forms a key discursive component in the new rhetoric on ‘disability-inclusive development’.

Keywords

Disability and poverty cycle Disability and development Disability/Poverty nexus Decolonising discourse and practice Disability inclusive development Poverty reduction Disability mainstreaming 

References

  1. Akter, S., & Mallick, D. (2013). The poverty–vulnerability–resilience nexus: Evidence from Bangladesh. Ecological Economics, 96, 114–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alkire, S., & Foster, J. (2011). Understandings and misunderstandings of multidimensional poverty measurement. Oxford: Oxford Poverty & Human Development Initiative.Google Scholar
  3. CBM. (n.d.). The twin-track approach. Retrieved from http://www.cbm.org/The-Twin-Track-approach-250816.php. Accessed 6 Nov 2015.
  4. Charlton, J. I. (1998). Nothing about us without us: Disability oppression and empowerment. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen, S., & Ravallion, M. (2007). Absolute poverty measures for the developing world, 1981–2004. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  6. Coleridge, P. (1993). Disability, liberation and development. Oxford: Oxfam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cooke, B., & Kothari, U. (Eds.). (2000). Participation: The new tyranny? London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  8. Department for International Development (DFID). (2000). Disability, poverty and development. London: DFID.Google Scholar
  9. Eide, A. H., & Ingstad, B. (Eds.). (2011). Disability and poverty: A global challenge. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  10. Eide, A. H., & Loeb, M. (2016). Counting disabled people: Historical perspectives and the challenges of disability statistics. In S. Grech & K. Soldatic (Eds.), Disability in the Global South: The critical handbook. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  11. Elwan, A. (1999). Poverty and disability: A survey of the literature. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  12. Filmer, D. (2008). Disability, poverty, and schooling in developing countries: Results from 14 household surveys. World Bank Economic Review, 22(1), 141–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gilroy, J., & Donelly, M. (2016). Australian indigenous people with disability: Ethics and standpoint theory. In S. Grech & K. Soldatic (Eds.), Disability in the Global South: The critical handbook. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  14. Grech, S. (2009). Disability, poverty and development: Critical reflections on the majority world debate. Disability & Society, 24(6), 771–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Grech, S. (2011). Recolonising debates or perpetuated coloniality? Decentring the spaces of disability, development and community in the global South. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 15(1), 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grech, S. (2012). Disability and the majority world: A neocolonial approach. In D. Goodley, B. Hughes, & L. Davis (Eds.), Disability and social theory: New developments and directions (pp. 52–69). London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Grech, S. (2014). Disability, poverty and education: Perceived barriers and (dis)connections in rural Guatemala. Disability and the Global South, 1(1), 128–152.Google Scholar
  18. Grech, S. (2015). Disability and poverty in the global South. Renegotiating development in Guatemala. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Grech, S. (2016). Disability and development: Critical connections, gaps and contradictions. In S. Grech & K. Soldatic (Eds.), Disability in the global South: The critical handbook. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Grech, S., & Goodley, D. (2012). Doing disability research in the majority world: An alternative framework and the quest for decolonising methods. Journal of Human Development, Disability, and Social Change, 19(2), 43–55.Google Scholar
  21. Groce, N., Kembhavi, G., Wirz, S., Lang, R., Trani, J. F., & Kett, M. (2011). Poverty and disability: A critical review of the literature in low and middle-income countries. London: University College London.Google Scholar
  22. Helander, E. (1992). Prejudice and dignity. New York, NY: Karpf.Google Scholar
  23. Ingstad, B. (1997). Community-based rehabilitation in Botswana. Lewiston, NY: Mellen.Google Scholar
  24. Ingstad, B., & Whyte, S. R. (1995). Introduction. In B. Ingstad & S. Whyte (Eds.), Disability and culture (pp. 137–139). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  25. Ingstad, B., & Whyte, S. R. (Eds.). (2007). Disability in local and global worlds. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  26. Kuipers, P., & Sabuni, L. P. (2016). Community-based rehabilitation and disability-inclusive development: On a winding path to an uncertain destination. In S. Grech & K. Soldatic (Eds.), Disability in the global South: The critical handbook. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  27. Lister, R. (2004). Poverty. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  28. Loeb, M., Eide, A. H., Jelsma, J., Ka Toni, M., & Maart, S. (2008). Poverty and disability in Eastern and Western Cape Provinces, South Africa. Disability & Society, 23(4), 311–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lwanga-Ntale, C. (2003). Chronic poverty and disability in Uganda. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University ILR School.Google Scholar
  30. Miles, M. (2007). International strategies for disability-related work in developing countries: Historical, modern and critical reflections. Farsta, Sweden: Independent Living Institute. Retrieved from http://www.independentliving.org/docs7/miles200701.html. Accessed 24 Nov 2013.Google Scholar
  31. Mitra, S., Posarac, A., & Vick, B. (2011). Disability and poverty in developing countries: A snapshot from the world health survey. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  32. Mitra, S., Posarac, A., & Vick, B. (2013). Disability and poverty in developing countries: A multidimensional study. World Development, 41, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mohanty, C. T. (2003). Feminism without borders: Decolonizing theory, practicing solidarity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mont, D. (2007). Measuring disability prevalence. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  35. Mont, D., & Nguyen, C. (2013). Spatial variation in the disability-poverty correlation: Evidence from Vietnam. London: University College London.Google Scholar
  36. Oliver, M. (1990). The politics of disablement. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Palmer, M. (2012). Disability and poverty: A conceptual review. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 21(4), 210–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Reeve, D. (2002). Negotiating psycho-emotional dimensions of disability and their influence on identity constructions. Disability & Society, 17(5), 493–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Runswick-Cole, K., & Goodley, D. (2013). Resilience: A disability studies and community psychology approach. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7(2), 67–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Santos, B. (2014). Epistemologies of the South: Justice against epistemicide. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Soldatic, K., & Grech, S. (2014). Transnationalising disability studies: Rights, justice and impairment. Disability Studies Quarterly, 34(2). Retrieved from http://dsq-sds.org/article/view/4249. Accessed 7 Dec 2015.
  43. Thomas, C. (1999). Female forms: Experiencing and understanding disability. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Thomas, C. (2007). Sociologies of disability and illness contested ideas in disability studies and medical sociology. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  45. Trani, J. F., & Loeb, M. (2012). Poverty and disability: A vicious circle? Evidence from Afghanistan and Zambia. Journal of International Development, 24(1), 19–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tuhiwai Smith, L. (2002). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous people. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  47. World Health Organization and World Bank. (2011). World report on disability. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
  48. Yeo, R. (2005). Disability, poverty and the new development agenda. London: Disability Knowledge and Research Programme, DFID.Google Scholar
  49. Yeo, R., & ADD. (2001). Chronic poverty and disability. Somerset: Action on Disability and Development. Retrieved from http://www.addc.org.au/documents/resources/add-chronic-poverty-and-disability_990.pdf. Accessed 7 Dec 2015.Google Scholar
  50. Yeo, R., & Moore, K. (2003). Including disabled people in poverty reduction work: Nothing about us, without us. World Development, 31(3), 571–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Global Disability ResearchThe Critical InstituteAttardMalta

Personalised recommendations