Skip to main content

Disability and Poverty: Complex Interactions and Critical Reframings

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Disability in the Global South

Abstract

The relationship between disability and poverty has been acknowledged with reasonable conviction in recent years. Various commentators have expressed how disability and poverty are bound together, one feeding into the other, a relationship typically presented as a mutually reinforcing cycle (World Health Organization and World Bank 2011). Within this discourse, sometimes supported by schematic representations, it is said that poverty exacerbates and/or intensifies impairment or vulnerability to it, while the barriers encountered by disabled people result in a greater chance of falling into or experiencing more intense poverty. As a result, disabled people are said to be among the poorest of the poor. The argument that impoverishment is what typifies many of these disabled lives, supports the efforts of those who insist that disability is not only relevant to, but cuts across international development policy, research and practice. This has come to be known as disability mainstreaming (see Chap. 1 in this volume, Grech 2016). The emphasis on the disability/poverty relationship has remained a strong linchpin in negotiations with the United Nations to get disability into the coveted Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and now forms a key discursive component in the new rhetoric on ‘disability-inclusive development’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    One of the very few offerings critically debating and reframing this relation is that by Grech (2015).

References

  • Akter, S., & Mallick, D. (2013). The poverty–vulnerability–resilience nexus: Evidence from Bangladesh. Ecological Economics, 96, 114–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alkire, S., & Foster, J. (2011). Understandings and misunderstandings of multidimensional poverty measurement. Oxford: Oxford Poverty & Human Development Initiative.

    Google Scholar 

  • CBM. (n.d.). The twin-track approach. Retrieved from http://www.cbm.org/The-Twin-Track-approach-250816.php. Accessed 6 Nov 2015.

  • Charlton, J. I. (1998). Nothing about us without us: Disability oppression and empowerment. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S., & Ravallion, M. (2007). Absolute poverty measures for the developing world, 1981–2004. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleridge, P. (1993). Disability, liberation and development. Oxford: Oxfam.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, B., & Kothari, U. (Eds.). (2000). Participation: The new tyranny? London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for International Development (DFID). (2000). Disability, poverty and development. London: DFID.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eide, A. H., & Ingstad, B. (Eds.). (2011). Disability and poverty: A global challenge. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eide, A. H., & Loeb, M. (2016). Counting disabled people: Historical perspectives and the challenges of disability statistics. In S. Grech & K. Soldatic (Eds.), Disability in the Global South: The critical handbook. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elwan, A. (1999). Poverty and disability: A survey of the literature. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filmer, D. (2008). Disability, poverty, and schooling in developing countries: Results from 14 household surveys. World Bank Economic Review, 22(1), 141–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilroy, J., & Donelly, M. (2016). Australian indigenous people with disability: Ethics and standpoint theory. In S. Grech & K. Soldatic (Eds.), Disability in the Global South: The critical handbook. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grech, S. (2009). Disability, poverty and development: Critical reflections on the majority world debate. Disability & Society, 24(6), 771–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grech, S. (2011). Recolonising debates or perpetuated coloniality? Decentring the spaces of disability, development and community in the global South. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 15(1), 87–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grech, S. (2012). Disability and the majority world: A neocolonial approach. In D. Goodley, B. Hughes, & L. Davis (Eds.), Disability and social theory: New developments and directions (pp. 52–69). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Grech, S. (2014). Disability, poverty and education: Perceived barriers and (dis)connections in rural Guatemala. Disability and the Global South, 1(1), 128–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grech, S. (2015). Disability and poverty in the global South. Renegotiating development in Guatemala. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Grech, S. (2016). Disability and development: Critical connections, gaps and contradictions. In S. Grech & K. Soldatic (Eds.), Disability in the global South: The critical handbook. New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Grech, S., & Goodley, D. (2012). Doing disability research in the majority world: An alternative framework and the quest for decolonising methods. Journal of Human Development, Disability, and Social Change, 19(2), 43–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groce, N., Kembhavi, G., Wirz, S., Lang, R., Trani, J. F., & Kett, M. (2011). Poverty and disability: A critical review of the literature in low and middle-income countries. London: University College London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helander, E. (1992). Prejudice and dignity. New York, NY: Karpf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingstad, B. (1997). Community-based rehabilitation in Botswana. Lewiston, NY: Mellen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingstad, B., & Whyte, S. R. (1995). Introduction. In B. Ingstad & S. Whyte (Eds.), Disability and culture (pp. 137–139). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingstad, B., & Whyte, S. R. (Eds.). (2007). Disability in local and global worlds. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuipers, P., & Sabuni, L. P. (2016). Community-based rehabilitation and disability-inclusive development: On a winding path to an uncertain destination. In S. Grech & K. Soldatic (Eds.), Disability in the global South: The critical handbook. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lister, R. (2004). Poverty. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loeb, M., Eide, A. H., Jelsma, J., Ka Toni, M., & Maart, S. (2008). Poverty and disability in Eastern and Western Cape Provinces, South Africa. Disability & Society, 23(4), 311–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lwanga-Ntale, C. (2003). Chronic poverty and disability in Uganda. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University ILR School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. (2007). International strategies for disability-related work in developing countries: Historical, modern and critical reflections. Farsta, Sweden: Independent Living Institute. Retrieved from http://www.independentliving.org/docs7/miles200701.html. Accessed 24 Nov 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitra, S., Posarac, A., & Vick, B. (2011). Disability and poverty in developing countries: A snapshot from the world health survey. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitra, S., Posarac, A., & Vick, B. (2013). Disability and poverty in developing countries: A multidimensional study. World Development, 41, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty, C. T. (2003). Feminism without borders: Decolonizing theory, practicing solidarity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mont, D. (2007). Measuring disability prevalence. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mont, D., & Nguyen, C. (2013). Spatial variation in the disability-poverty correlation: Evidence from Vietnam. London: University College London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, M. (1990). The politics of disablement. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, M. (2012). Disability and poverty: A conceptual review. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 21(4), 210–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeve, D. (2002). Negotiating psycho-emotional dimensions of disability and their influence on identity constructions. Disability & Society, 17(5), 493–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runswick-Cole, K., & Goodley, D. (2013). Resilience: A disability studies and community psychology approach. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7(2), 67–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos, B. (2014). Epistemologies of the South: Justice against epistemicide. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soldatic, K., & Grech, S. (2014). Transnationalising disability studies: Rights, justice and impairment. Disability Studies Quarterly, 34(2). Retrieved from http://dsq-sds.org/article/view/4249. Accessed 7 Dec 2015.

  • Thomas, C. (1999). Female forms: Experiencing and understanding disability. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, C. (2007). Sociologies of disability and illness contested ideas in disability studies and medical sociology. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trani, J. F., & Loeb, M. (2012). Poverty and disability: A vicious circle? Evidence from Afghanistan and Zambia. Journal of International Development, 24(1), 19–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuhiwai Smith, L. (2002). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous people. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization and World Bank. (2011). World report on disability. Geneva: WHO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeo, R. (2005). Disability, poverty and the new development agenda. London: Disability Knowledge and Research Programme, DFID.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeo, R., & ADD. (2001). Chronic poverty and disability. Somerset: Action on Disability and Development. Retrieved from http://www.addc.org.au/documents/resources/add-chronic-poverty-and-disability_990.pdf. Accessed 7 Dec 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeo, R., & Moore, K. (2003). Including disabled people in poverty reduction work: Nothing about us, without us. World Development, 31(3), 571–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shaun Grech .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Grech, S. (2016). Disability and Poverty: Complex Interactions and Critical Reframings. In: Grech, S., Soldatic, K. (eds) Disability in the Global South. International Perspectives on Social Policy, Administration, and Practice. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42488-0_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42488-0_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-42486-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-42488-0

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics