Skip to main content

Disability and Development: Critical Connections, Gaps and Contradictions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Disability in the Global South

Abstract

The World Report on Disability (WHO and World Bank, 2011) estimates that around 15 per cent of the world’s population are disabled people, that is, close to one billion people. It goes on to state that the majority of these, approximately 80 per cent, are located in the global South. Many of these people are said to live in rural areas in conditions of poverty and extreme poverty. It perhaps comes as no surprise that the bulk of disabled people may be located within the southern space, because poverty always has provided and continues to provide multiple conditions for the creation and maintenance of impairment. The numbers of disabled people continue to rise on account of hunger and malnutrition, inaccessible health care and rehabilitation, unsanitary living conditions, violence and conflict as well as ‘development’ in increasingly turbulent times. Disability has perhaps always been disproportionately present in these spaces if we are to historicise it within the violent colonial encounter, continuing in the geopolitical asymmetries of today’s coloniality (see Grech 2015).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The reasons for the failure of gender mainstreaming have been various including implementation problems, ineffectiveness, devaluation of the importance of local contexts and lack of sensitivity to political scenarios and change, among others.

References

  • Albert, B. (Ed.). (2006). In or out of the mainstream? Lessons from research on disability and development cooperation. Leeds: The Disability Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albert, B., & Hurst, R. (2005). Disability and a human rights approach to development. London: Disability KaR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Government. (2015). Development for all 2015–2020: Strategy for strengthening disability-inclusive development in Australia’s aid program. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman Bieler, R. (2006). The MDGs, disability and inclusive development. Presentation at the World Congress on Communications for Development, Rome, October.

    Google Scholar 

  • CBM. (2008). CBM and the twin-track approach to disability and development. Germany: CBM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comaroff, J., & Comaroff, J. L. (2012). Theory from the South. London: Paradigm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramm, J. M., & Finkenflügel, H. (2008). Exclusion of disabled people from microcredit in Africa and Asia: A literature study. Asia Pacific Disability Rehabilitation Journal, 19(2), 15–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutajar, J. (2008). Knowledge and post-colonial pedagogy. Mediterranean Journal of Educational Studies, 13(2), 27–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • DFID. (2000). Disability, poverty and development. London: DFID.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escobar, A. (1995). Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the Third World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanon, F. (1963). The wretched of the Earth. New York: Grove.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, A. G. (1967). Capitalism and underdevelopment in Latin America. New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garland-Thomson, R. (2010). Integrating disability, transforming feminist theory. In L. J. Davis (Ed.), The disability studies reader (pp. 353–373). New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grech, S. (2009). Disability, poverty and development: Critical reflections on the majority world debate. Disability & Society, 24(6), 771–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grech, S. (2011). Recolonising debates or perpetuated coloniality? Decentring the spaces of disability, development and community in the global South. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 15(1), 87–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grech, S. (2012). Disability and the majority world: A neocolonial approach. In D. Goodley, B. Hughes, & L. Davis (Eds.), Disability and Social Theory: New developments and directions (pp. 52–69). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Grech, S. (2014). The spaces of poverty: Renegotiating place and disability in the global South. In K. Soldatic, A. Roulstone, & H. Morgan (Eds.), Disability, spaces, and places of policy exclusion (pp. 48–63). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grech, S. (2015). Disability and poverty in the global South: Renegotiating development in Guatemala. London: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Grech, S. (2016). Disability and poverty: Complex interactions and critical reframings. In S. Grech & K. Soldatic (Eds.), Disability in the global South: The critical handbook. New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, M., Mannan, H., & MacLachlan, M. (2009). Empowerment, advocacy and national development policy: A case study of disabled peoples’ organizations in Bolivia. In M. MacLachlan & L. Swartz (Eds.), Disability & international development: Towards inclusive global health (pp. 105–117). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Groce, N. (2009). Disability, poverty, human rights and the need for accurate data to promote action. ALTER European Journal of Disability Research, 3(3), 185–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, J., Baud, S., Bekkers, R., Bernstein, S., Boas, I., Cornelissen, V. et al. (2014). Sustainable development goals and inclusive development. POST2015/UNU-IAS Policy Brief #5. Tokyo: United Nations University Institute for the Advanced Study of Sustainability.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2014). Seventeen contradictions and the end of capitalism. London: Profile Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • IFRC. (2007). Micro-credit: ARwandan experience. Kenya: IFRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingstad, B. (2001). Disability in the developing world. In G. L. Albrecht, K. D. Seelman, & M. Bury (Eds.), Handbook of disability studies (pp. 219–251). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingstad, B., & Whyte, S. R. (Eds.). (2007). Disability in local and global words. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lander, E. (2000). Ciencias sociales: Saberes coloniales y eurocéntricos [Social sciences: Colonial and eurocentric knowledges]. In E. Lander (Ed.), La colonialidad del saber: Eurocentrismo y cienciassocials (pp. 11–41). Buenos Aires: CLACSO–UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, J., Posarac, A., Nicoli, M., et al. (2010). Disability and international cooperation and development: A review of policies and practices. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMichael, P. (2008). Development and social change. Los Angeles: Pine Forge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meekosha, H. (2011). Decolonizing disability: Thinking and acting globally. Disability & Society, 26(6), 667–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitra, S. (2010). Disability cash transfers in the context of poverty and unemployment: The case of South Africa. World Development, 38(12), 1692–1709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moraña, M., Dussel, E., & Jáuregui, C. A. (2008). Colonialism and its replicants. In M. Moraña, M. E. Dussel, & C. A. Jáuregui (Eds.), Coloniality at large: Latin America and the postcolonial debate (pp. 1–20). Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mwendwa, T. N., Murangira, A., & Lang, R. (2009). Mainstreaming the rights of persons with disabilities in national development frameworks. Journal of International Development, 21(5), 662–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nustad, K. G. (2001). Development: The devil we know? Third World Quarterly, 22(4), 479–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, M. (1990). The politics of disablement. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pisani, M., & Grech, S. (2015). Disability and forced migration: Critical intersectionalities. Disability and the Global South, 2(1), 421–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quijano, A. (2008). Coloniality of power, Eurocentrism, and social classification. In M. Moraña, M. E. Dussel, & C. A. Jáuregui (Eds.), Coloniality at large: Latin America and the postcolonial debate (pp. 181–224). Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riddell, R. C. (2010). Poverty, disability and aid: International development cooperation. In T. Barron & J. Ncube (Eds.), Poverty and disability (pp. 27–109). London: Leonard Cheshire International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos, B. D. (2007). Beyond Abyssal thinking: From global lines to ecologies of knowledges. Eurozine, 1–33. Retrieved April 18, 2015, from http://www.eurozine.com/pdf/2007-06-29-santos-en.pdf.

  • Shakespeare, T. (2013). Disability rights and wrongs revisited. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soldatic, K., & Grech, S. (2014). Transnationalising disability studies: Rights, justice and impairment. Disability Studies Quarterly, 34(2). Retrieved from http://dsq-sds.org/article/view/4249.

  • Source. (n. d.). Retrieved January 28, 2016, from http://www.asksource.info/.

  • True, J. (2010). Mainstreaming gender in international institutions. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN. (2015). Disability-inclusive sustainable development goals: 2030 Agenda for sustainable development. United Nations Enable. Retrieved December 3, 2015, from http://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/sdgs/disability_inclusive_sdgs.pdf.

  • UNESCO. (2012). Global initiative on out-of-school children. Paris: UNICEF and UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Veen, S. C. (2014). Development for all: Understanding disability inclusion in development organisations. Netherlands: VU University.

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO and World Bank. (2011). World report on disability. Geneva: World Health Organization. Retrieved from http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2011/9789240685215_eng.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wissenbach, L. (2014). Pathways to inclusive development: How to make disability inclusive practice measurable? Germany: GTZ.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shaun Grech .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Grech, S. (2016). Disability and Development: Critical Connections, Gaps and Contradictions. In: Grech, S., Soldatic, K. (eds) Disability in the Global South. International Perspectives on Social Policy, Administration, and Practice. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42488-0_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42488-0_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-42486-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-42488-0

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics