Aristotle on Eudaimonia: On the Virtue of Returning to the Source

  • Blaine J. FowersEmail author
Part of the International Handbooks of Quality-of-Life book series (IHQL)


Psychologists are increasingly interested in the topic of eudaimonia, a term adopted from ancient Greek philosophers (with most modern views traceable to Aristotle), referring to human flourishing. Conceptual confusion remains because investigators generally have not clarified how and why they have appropriated Aristotle’s concept of eudaimonia. This chapter presents a close interpretation of Aristotle’s view and explores continuities and discontinuities in psychologists’ application of this original concept to provide a theoretical baseline and increase conceptual clarity. Eudaimonia is explored as an ethical concept referring to the best kind of life, which is an outgrowth of humans’ natural endowments. Eudaimonia is a form of activity (that includes subjective experience, but is not limited to it), comprised by the pursuit of ends that are choiceworthy for human beings. Eudaimonia is a unified way of life, but it has multiple constituents (e.g., belonging, justice, and social harmony). Eudaimonia is related to, but distinct from pleasure (hedonia). Human flourishing is a matter of a complete life that encompasses virtue or excellence, and Aristotle saw it as the ultimate aim of human life. The chapter concludes with several major challenges for eudaimonia researchers.


Happiness Wellbeing Eudaimonia Aristotle Philosophy 


  1. American Psychological Association. (2003). Guidelines on multicultural education, training, research, practice, and organizational change for psychologists. American Psychologist, 58, 377–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. American Psychological Association. (2010). Psychological issues related to child abuse and neglect.
  3. Anscombe, G. E. M. (1958). Modern moral philosophy. Philosophy, 33, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aristotle. (1999). Nicomachean Ethics (trans: Ostwald, M.) Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  5. Arnhart, L. (1998). Darwinian natural right: The biological ethics of human nature. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bauer, J. J., McAdams, D. P., & Pals, J. L. (2008). Narrative identity and eudaimonic well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 81–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baumeister, R. F., & Exline, J. J. (1999). Virtue, personality, and social relations: Self-control as the moral muscle. Journal of Personality, 67, 1165–1194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Biswas-Diener, R., Kashdan, T. B., & King, L. A. (2009). Two traditions of happiness research, not two distinct types of happiness. Journal of Positive Psychology, 4, 208–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Broadie, S. (1991). Ethics with Aristotle. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Compton, W. C., Smith, M. L., Cornish, K. A., & Qualls, D. L. (1996). Factor structure of mental health measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 406–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cushman, P. (1995). Constructing the self, constructing America: A cultural history of psychotherapy. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  12. Danziger, K. (1990). Constructing the subject: Historical origins of psychological research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Diener, E. (2012). New findings and future directions for subjective well-being research. American Psychologist, 67, 590–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fowers, B. J. (2005). Virtue and psychology: Pursuing excellence in ordinary practices. Washington, DC: APA Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fowers, B. J. (2008). From continence to virtue: Recovering goodness, character unity, and character types for positive psychology. Theory & Psychology, 18, 629–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fowers, B. J. (2010). Instrumentalism and psychology: Beyond using and being used. Theory & Psychology, 20, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fowers, B. J. (2012). An Aristotelian framework for the human good. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 32, 10–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fowers, B. J. (2015). The evolution of ethics: Human sociality and the emergence of ethical mindedness. London: Palgrave/McMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fowers, B. J., Mollica, C. O., & Procacci, E. N. (2010). Constitutive and instrumental goal orientations and their relations with eudaimonic and hedonic well-being. Journal of Positive Psychology, 5, 139–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Huta, V. (2013). Pursuing eudaimonia versus hedonia: Distinctions, similarities, and relationships. In A. Waterman (Ed.), The best within us: Positive psychology perspectives on eudaimonic functioning (pp. 139–158). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Huta, V., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). Pursuing pleasure versus virtue: The differential and overlapping well-being benefits of hedonic and eudaimonic motives. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 735–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Huta, V., & Waterman, A. S. (2014). Eudaimonia and its distinction from hedonia: Developing a classification and terminology for understanding conceptual and operational definitions. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15, 1425–1456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kashdan, T. B., Biswas-Diener, R., & King, L. A. (2008). Reconsidering happiness: The costs of distinguishing between hedonics and eudaimonia. Journal of Positive Psychology, 3, 219–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Keyes, C. L. M., & Annas, J. (2009). Feeling good and functioning well: Distinctive concepts in ancient philosophy and contemporary science. Journal of Positive Psychology, 4, 197–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Keyes, C. L. M., Shmotkin, D., & Ryff, C. D. (2002). Optimizing well-being: The empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 1007–1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kosman, L. A. (1980). Being properly affected: Virtues and feelings in Aristotle’s ethics. In A. O. Rorty (Ed.), Essays on Aristotle’s ethics (pp. 103–116). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  27. Liddell, H. G., & Scott, R. (1996). A Greek-English lexicon. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  28. Linley, P. A., Maltby, J., Wood, A. M., Osborne, G., & Hurling, R. (2009). Measuring happiness: The higher order factor structure of subjective and psychological well-being measures. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 878–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. MacIntyre, A. (1981). After virtue: A study in moral theory. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  30. Martin, D. B. (2007). Inventing superstition: From the Hippocratics to the Christians. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Norton, D. L. (1976). Personal destinies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Okrent, M. (2007). Rational animals: The teleological roots of intentionality. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Ostwald, M. (1999). Translator’s notes in Aristotle’s The Nicomachean Ethics. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  34. Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  35. Peterson, C., Park, N., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2005). Orientation to happiness and life satisfaction: The full life versus the empty life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6, 25–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Richardson, F. C., Fowers, B. J., & Guignon, C. (1999). Re-envisioning psychology: Moral dimensions of theory and practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  37. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ryan, R. M., Huta, V., & Deci, E. L. (2008). Living well: A self-determination theory perspective on eudaimonia. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 139–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069–1081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. H. (2008). Know thyself and become what you are: A eudaimonic approach to psychological well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 13–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schwartz, B., & Sharpe, K. (2010). Practical wisdom: The right way to do the right thing. New York: Riverhead Books.Google Scholar
  42. Sheldon, K. M., & Kasser, T. (1995). Coherence and congruence: Two aspects of personality integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 531–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Steger, M. F., Kashdan, T. B., & Oishi, S. (2008). Being good by doing good: Daily eudaimonic activity and well-being. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 22–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Straume, L. V., & Vittersø, J. (2012). Happiness, inspiration and the fully functioning person: Separating hedonic and eudaimonic well-being in the workplace. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 7, 387–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the self. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Terman, L. M. (1954). The discovery and encouragement of exceptional talent. American Psychologist, 9, 221–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tiberius, V. (2013). Recipes for a good life: Eudaimonism and the contribution of philosophy. In A. Waterman (Ed.), The best within us: Positive psychology perspectives on eudaimonia. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  48. Waterman, A. S. (2008). Reconsidering happiness: A eudaimonist’s perspective. Journal of Positive Psychology, 3, 234–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Waterman, A. S., Schwartz, S. J., & Conti, R. (2008). The implications of two conceptions of happiness (hedonic enjoyment and eudaimonia) for the understanding of intrinsic motivation. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 41–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Waterman, A. S., Schwartz, S. J., Zamboanga, B. L., Ravert, R. D., Williams, M. K., Agocha, B., et al. (2010). The questionnaire for eudaimonic well-being: Psychometric properties, demographic comparisons, and evidence of validity. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 5, 41–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wiggins, D. (1980). Deliberation and practical reason. In A. O. Rorty (Ed.), Essays on Aristotle’s ethics (pp. 221–240). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Educational and Psychological StudiesUniversity of MiamiCoral GablesUSA

Personalised recommendations