Abstract
Persistent and heated terminological disputes (such as the one over the concept of eudaimonia) often hide something more fundamental and, when this is the case, agreeing on terms just moves the battle somewhere else: the lump under the carpet is pushed to a different quadrant, but it doesn’t go away. I want to explore one possible interpretation of the real lump under the carpet, namely, a very deep disagreement about the nature of a good human life. This disagreement is between those who think that what justifies our taking something to be good is our subjective attitude toward it (liking it, wanting it and so forth) and those who think that what justifies our taking something to be good is some good-making feature of the thing that is independent of how we feel about it. I consider some obstacles to understanding this disagreement and explore briefly why it matters.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Thanks to Blaine Fowers for drawing my attention to this issue.
- 2.
I would like to thank Blaine Fowers and Joar Vitterso for helpful comments on a draft of this epilogue.
References
Finnis, J. (1980). Natural law and human rights. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
Fletcher, G. (2013). A fresh start for the objective-list theory of well-being. Utilitas 25(02) (2013): 206–220. http://philpapers.org/rec/FLEAFS
Kraut, R. (2009). What is good and why: The ethics of well-being. Harvard University Press. http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=jq_u6DWjMFcC&oi=fnd&pg=PR7&dq=Kraut,+Richard&ots=OPVOoZa-bo&sig=t3jW5Yn1KZgnYvN5Xxyaub4EX38
Shafer-Landau, R. (2003). Moral realism: A defence. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Sumner, L. (1996). Welfare, happiness, and ethics. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
Woodard, C. (2015). Hybrid theories. In G. Flectcher (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of the philosophy of well-being. London: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tiberius, V. (2016). The Future of Eudaimonic Well-Being: Subjectivism, Objectivism and the Lump Under the Carpet. In: Vittersø, J. (eds) Handbook of Eudaimonic Well-Being. International Handbooks of Quality-of-Life. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42445-3_38
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42445-3_38
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-42443-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-42445-3
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)