Advertisement

Socrates’ Dissatisfaction, a Happiness Arms Race, and the Trouble with Eudaimonic Well-Being

  • Sarah J. Ward
  • Laura A. KingEmail author
Chapter
Part of the International Handbooks of Quality-of-Life book series (IHQL)

Abstract

Although originally eudaimonia was intended to be viewed as a philosophy or life or code of conduct, it is now widely treated as a type of well-being that is distinct and superior to happiness or life satisfaction. In this chapter, we argue that the conceptual and theoretical distinction between eudaimonic and hedonic well-being is both misguided and lacking in empirical support. We then describe research on flourishing that demonstrates that people who exemplify the eudaimonic ideal—unhappy people who nonetheless pursue eudaimonic aims—are actually quite rare. We conclude by making recommendations for the study of eudaimonia. In contrast to the emphasis on eudaimonia as a form of well-being, we propose that it may be useful to investigate the antecedents and consequences of eudaimonia as a type of motivation distinct from its relation to subjective well-being. Understanding the benefits of eudaimonia as a motivational construct or value system can illuminate the broader importance of this construct.

Keywords

Happiness Well-being Eudaimonia Meaning 

References

  1. Aristotle. (1986). Nicomachean ethics. New York: Macmillan (Original work published 4th Century BCE).Google Scholar
  2. Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., Aaker, J. L., & Garbinsky, E. N. (2013). Some key differences between a happy life and a meaningful life. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 8(6), 505–516. doi: 10.1080/17439760.2013.830764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Biswas-Diener, R., Kashdan, T., & King, L. A. (2009). Two traditions of happiness research, not two distinct types of happiness. Journal of Positive Psychology, 4, 208–211. doi: 10.1080/17439760902844400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown, N. L., MacDonald, D. A., Samanta, M. P., Friedman, H. L., & Coyne, J. C. (2014). A critical reanalysis of the relationship between genomics and well-being. PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(35), 12705–12709. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1407057111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Diener, E., & Diener, C. (1996). Most people are happy. Psychological Science, 7(3), 181–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Disabato, D. J., Goodman, F. R., Kashdan, T. B., Short, J. L., & Jarden, A. (2015). Different types of well-being? A cross-cultural examination of hedonic and eudaimnic well-being. Psychological Assessment (in press).Google Scholar
  7. Fredrickson, B. L., Grewen, K. M., Coffey, K. A., Algoe, S. B., Firestine, A. M., Arevalo, J. G., & … Cole, S. W. (2013). A functional genomic perspective on human well-being. PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(33), 13684–13689.Google Scholar
  8. Heintzelman, S. J., & King, L. A. (2014). Life is pretty meaningful. American Psychologist, 69(6), 561–574. doi: 10.1037/a0035049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Huta, V., Pelletier, L., Baxter, D., & Thompson, A. (2012). How eudaimonic and hedonic motives relate to the well-being of close others. Journal of Positive Psychology, 7, 399–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Huta, V., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). Pursuing pleasure or virtue: The differential and overlapping well-being benefits of hedonic and eudaimonic motives. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 735–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Huta, V., & Waterman, A. S. (2014). Eudaimonia and its distinction from hedonia: Developing a classification and terminology for understanding conceptual and operational definitions. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15, 1425–1456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kashdan, T. B., Biswas-Diener, R., & King, L. A. (2008). Reconsidering happiness: The costs of distinguishing between hedonics and eudaimonia. Journal of Positive Psychology, 8, 219–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Keyes, C. L. M. (2002). The mental health continuum: From languishing to flourishing in life. Journal of Health and Social Research, 43, 207–222.Google Scholar
  14. King, L. A., & Hicks, J. A. (2007). Whatever happened to“ What might have been”? Regrets, happiness, and maturity. American Psychologist, 62(7), 625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. King, L. A., Hicks, J. A., Krull, J. L., & Del Gaiso, A. K. (2006). Positive affect and the experience of meaning in life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(1), 179–196. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.1.179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lucas, R. E., & Diener, E. (2015). Personality and subjective well-being: Current issues and controversies. In M. Mikulincer, P. R. Shaver, M. L. Cooper, & R. J. Larsen (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology, volume 4: Personality processes and individual differences (pp. 577–599). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi: 10.1037/14343-026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mill, J. S. (1863/2001). Utilitarianism. Kitchener, ON: Batoche Books.Google Scholar
  18. Mother, T. (2007). In B. Kolodiejchuk (Ed.), Mother Teresa: Come be my light: The private writings of the saint of Calcutta. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  19. Ruedy, N. E., Moore, C., Gino, F., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2013). The cheater’s high: The unexpected affective benefits of unethical behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(4), 531–548. doi: 10.1037/a0034231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality And Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069–1081. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. (1998). The contours of positive human health. Psychological Inquiry, 9(1), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Schotanus-Dijkstra, M., Pieterse, M. E., Drossaert, C. H. C., Westerhof, G. J., de Graaf, R., ten Have, M. et al. (2015). What factors are associated with flourishing? Results from a large representative national sample. Journal of Happiness Studies (in press).Google Scholar
  24. Waterman, A. S. (2007). On the importance of distinguishing hedonia and eudaimonia when contemplating the hedonic treadmill. American Psychologist, 62(6), 612–613. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X62.6.612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Waterman, A. S. (Ed.). (2013). The best within us: Positive psychology perspectives on eudaimonia. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.  10.1037/14092-000.Google Scholar
  26. Zaleski, C. (2003, May). The dark night of Mother Teresa. First Things. http://www.firstthings.com/article/2003/05/the-dark-night-of-mother-teresa downloaded 10/9/2015.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of MissouriColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations