Advertisement

The Eudaimonics of Human Strengths: The Relations Between Character Strengths and Well-Being

  • Claudia HarzerEmail author
Chapter
Part of the International Handbooks of Quality-of-Life book series (IHQL)

Abstract

The present chapter was aimed at presenting an overview of the findings on the relations between character strengths and well-being. In order to get a broader picture about these relations, not just eudaimonic well-being but also hedonic well-being was considered. Within the scope of the chapter at hand, focus was on subjective well-being as indicator of hedonic well-being as well as on psychological well-being as indicator of eudaimonic well-being. Following the definitions of these constructs, research findings on the correlations between character strengths and well-being (i.e., subjective well-being: positive affect, negative affect, and global life satisfaction; psychological well-being: environmental mastery, personal growth, purpose in life, autonomy, self-acceptance, and positive relationships) are presented. None of the character strengths systematically showed a correlation coefficient that indicated a detrimental relation between a strength and (indicators of) subjective and psychological well-being. On the contrary and as expected, character strengths seem to be important individual factors facilitating well-being. Across all indicators of well-being (i.e., subjective well-being and psychological well-being) zest, hope, and curiosity were the most substantial correlates among the character strengths. Moreover, in addition to zest, hope, and curiosity, further character strengths were relevant for specific indicators of subjective well-being and psychological well-being as well. In-depth interpretations of the most important relations are presented and discussed. Finally, concluding remarks and open questions are presented, and future directions for research are discussed.

Keywords

Character strengths Subjective well-being Psychological well-being Hedonism Eudaimonia Hedonic well-being Eudaimonic well-being Happiness 

References

  1. Anaby, D., Jarus, T., & Zumbo, B. D. (2010). Psychometric evaluation of the Hebrew language version of the Satisfaction with Life Scale. Social Indicators Research, 96, 267–274. doi: 10.1007/s11205-009-9476-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atienza, F. L., Balaguer, I., & Garcı́a-Merita, M. L. (2003). Satisfaction with life scale: Analysis of factorial invariance across sexes. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 1255–1260. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00332-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Azañedo, C. M., Fernández-Abascal, E. G., & Barraca, J. (2014). Character strengths in Spain: Validation of the Values in Action Inventory of Strengths (VIA-IS) in a Spanish sample. Clínica y Salud, 25, 123–130. doi: 10.1016/j.clysa.2014.06.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Biswas-Diener, R. (2006). From the equator to the North Pole: A study of character strengths. Journal of Happiness Studies, 7, 293–310. doi: 10.1007/s10902-005-3646-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blais, M. R., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., & Brière, N. M. (1989). L’Echelle de Satisfaction de vie: Validation canadienne-française du “Satisfaction With Life Scale” [The satisfaction scale: Canadian-French validation of the Satisfaction with Life Scale.]. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 21, 210–223. doi: 10.1037/h0079854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brdar, I., & Kashdan, T. B. (2010). Character strengths and well-being in Croatia: An empirical investigation of structure and correlates. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 151–154. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2009.12.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cangiano, F., & Parker, S. K. (2016). Proactivity for mental health and well-being. In S. Clarke, T. M. Probst, F. W. Guldenmund, & J. Passmore (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell handbook of the psychology of occupational safety and workplace health (pp. 228–250). Malden, MA: Wiley.Google Scholar
  8. Chancellor, J., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2013). Humble beginnings: Current trends, state perspectives, and hallmarks of humility. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7, 819–833. doi: 10.1111/spc3.12069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Diener, E. (1994). Assessing subjective well-being. Progress and opportunities. Social Indicators Research, 31, 103–157. doi: 10.1007/BF01207052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., & Oishi, S. (2005). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and life satisfaction. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 63–73). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276–302. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.125.2.276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Doty, D. H., & Glick, W. H. (1998). Common method bias: Does common methods variance really bias results? Organizational Research Methods, 1, 374–406. doi: 10.1177/109442819814002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Forest, J., Mageau, G. V. A., Crevier-Braud, L., Bergeron, L., Dubreuil, P., & Lavigne, G. V. L. (2012). Harmonious passion as an explanation of the relation between signature strengths’ use and well-being at work: Test of an intervention program. Human Relations, 65, 1233–1252. doi: 10.1177/0018726711433134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fredrickson, B. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology. American Psychologist, 56, 218–226. doi: 10.1037//0003-066X.56.3.218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gable, S. L., & Haidt, J. (2005). What (and why) is positive psychology? Review of General Psychology, 9, 103–110. doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.9.2.103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gander, F., Proyer, R. T., Ruch, W., & Wyss, T. (2013). Strength-based positive interventions: Further evidence on their potential for enhancing well-being and alleviating depression. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14, 1241–1259. doi: 10.1007%2Fs10902-012-9380-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gaudreau, P., Sanchez, X., & Blondin, J.-P. (2006). Positive and negative affective states in a performance-related setting: Testing the factorial structure of the PANAS across two samples of French-Canadian participants. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 22, 240–249. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759.22.4.240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Glaesmer, H., Grande, G., Braehler, E., & Roth, M. (2011). The German version of the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS): Psychometric properties, validity, and population-based norms. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 27, 127–132. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gradišek, P. (2012). Character strengths and life satisfaction of Slovenian in-service and pre-service teachers. Center for Educational Policies Studies Journal, 2, 167–180.Google Scholar
  21. Güsewell, A., & Ruch, W. (2012). Are only emotional strengths emotional? Character strengths and disposition to positive emotions. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 4, 218–239. doi: 10.1111/j.1758-0854.2012.01070.x.Google Scholar
  22. Harzer, C. (2016). The relations of character strengths with subjective and psychological well-being. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  23. Harzer, C., & Ruch, W. (2012). When the job is a calling: The role of applying one’s signature strengths at work. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 7, 362–371. doi: 10.1080/17439760.2012.702784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Harzer, C., & Ruch, W. (2013). The application of signature character strengths and positive experiences at work. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14, 965–983. doi: 10.1007/s10902-012-9364-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Harzer, C., & Ruch, W. (2014). The role of character strengths for task performance, job dedication, interpersonal facilitation, and organizational support. Human Performance, 27, 183–205. doi: 10.1080/08959285.2014.913592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Harzer, C., & Ruch, W. (2015). The relationships of character strengths with coping, work-related stress, and job satisfaction. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 165. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Harzer, C., & Ruch, W. (in press). Your strengths are calling: Preliminary results of a strengths-based online-intervention to increase calling. Journal of Happiness Studies. doi: 10.1007/s10902-015-9692-y.Google Scholar
  28. Huta, V., & Hawley, L. (2010). Psychological strengths and cognitive vulnerabilities: Are they two ends of the same continuum or do they have independent relationships with well-being and ill-being? Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 71–93. doi: 10.1007/s10902-008-9123-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jayawickreme, E., Forgeard, M. J. C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2012). The engine of well-being. Review of General Psychology, 16, 327–342. doi: 10.1037/a0027990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Khumalo, I. P., Wissing, M. P., & Temane, Q. (2008). Exploring the validity of the Values-In-Action Inventory of Strengths (VIA-IS) in an African context. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 18, 133–142.Google Scholar
  31. Kishida, Y., Kitamura, T., Gatayama, R., Matsuoka, T., Miura, S., & Yamabe, K. (2004). Ryff’s psychological well-being inventory: Factorial structure and life history correlates among Japanese university students. Psychological Reports, 94, 83–103. doi: 10.2466/PR0.94.1.83-103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Krohne, H. W., Egloff, B., Kohlmann, C. W., & Tausch, A. (1996). Untersuchungen mit einer deutschen Version der Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) [Investigations with a German version of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS)]. Diagnostica, 42, 139–156.Google Scholar
  33. Leontopoulou, S., & Triliva, S. (2012). Explorations of subjective wellbeing and character strengths among a Greek University student sample. International Journal of Wellbeing, 2, 251–270. doi: 10.5502/ijw.v2.i3.6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Littman-Ovadia, H., & Lavy, S. (2012). Character strengths in Israel: Hebrew adaptation of the VIA inventory of strengths. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 28, 41–50. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Littman-Ovadia, H., & Steger, M. F. (2010). Character strengths and well-being among volunteers and employees: Toward an integrative model. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 5, 419–430. doi: 10.1080/17439760.2010.516765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Martínez Martí, M. L., & Ruch, W. (2014). Character strengths and well-being across the life span: Data from a representative sample of German-speaking adults living in Switzerland. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1253. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01253.Google Scholar
  37. Miljković, D., & Rijavec, M. (2008). What makes us happy: Strengths of mind, strengths of heart or self-control? In M. Cindrić, V. Domović, & M. Matijevic (Eds.), Collected papers of 2nd scientific research symposium: Pedagogy and the knowledge society (Vol. 1, pp. 241–250). Zagreb, Croatia: Učiteljski fakulte.Google Scholar
  38. Mitchell, J., Stanimirovic, R., Klein, B., & Vella-Brodrick, D. A. (2009). A randomised controlled trial of a self-guided internet intervention promoting well-being. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 749–760. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2009.02.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Otake, K., Shimai, S., Ikemi, A., Utsuki, N., Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2005). Development of the Japanese version of the Values in Action Inventory of Strengths (VIA-IS). Japanese Journal of Psychology, 76, 461–467. doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.76.461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2006). Moral competence and character strengths among adolescents: The development and validation of the values in action inventory of strengths for youth. Journal of Adolescence, 29, 891–909. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2006.04.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2007). Methodological issues in positive psychology and the assessment of character strengths. In A. D. Ong & M. H. M. van Dulmen (Eds.), Handbook of methods in positive psychology (pp. 292–305). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Park, N., Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004a). Strengths of character and well-being. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23, 603–619. doi: 10.1521/jscp.23.5.603.50748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Park, N., Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004b). Reply: Strengths of character and well-being: A closer look at hope and modesty. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23, 628–634. doi: 10.1521/jscp.23.5.628.50749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Park, N., Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2006). Character strengths in fifty-four nations and the fifty US states. Journal of Positive Psychology, 1, 118–129. doi: 10.1080/17439760600619567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Parker, S. K., Bindl, U. K., & Strauss, K. (2010). Making things happen: A model of proactive motivation. Journal of Management, 36, 827–856. doi: 10.1177/0149206310363732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Peterson, C. (2006). A primer in positive psychology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Peterson, C., & Park, N. (2006). Character strengths in organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 1149–1154. doi: 10.1002/job.398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Peterson, C., & Park, N. (2007). Attachment security and its benefits in context. Psychological Inquiry, 18, 172–176. doi: 10.1080/10478400701512752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Peterson, C., Park, N., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2005a). Assessment of character strengths. In G. P. Koocher, J. C. Norcross, & S. S. Hill III (Eds.), Psychologists’ desk reference (2nd ed., pp. 93–98). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Peterson, C., Park, N., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2005b). Orientations to happiness and life satisfaction: The full versus the empty life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6, 25–41. doi: 10.1007/s10902-004-1278-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Peterson, C., Park, N., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2006). Greater strengths of character and recovery from illness. Journal of Positive Psychology, 1, 17–26. doi: 10.1080/17439760500372739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Proctor, C., Maltby, J., & Linley, P. A. (2011). Strengths use as a predictor of wellbeing and health-related quality of life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12, 153–169. doi: 10.1007/s10902-009-9181-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Proyer, R. T., Ruch, W., & Buschor, C. (2013). Testing strengths-based interventions: A preliminary study on the effectiveness of a program targeting curiosity, gratitude, hope, humor, and zest for enhancing life satisfaction. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14, 275–292. doi: 10.1007/s10902-012-9331-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Quinlan, D., Swain, N., & Vella-Brodrick, D. A. (2012). Character strengths interventions: Building on what we know for improved outcomes. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13, 1145–1163. doi: 10.1007/s10902-011-9311-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Risch, A. K. (2008). Rezidivierende Depression: Psychologische Risikofaktoren und Prädiktoren des Störungsverlaufs [Recurrent depression: Psychological risk factors and predictors of the progress of disease] (Doctoral dissertation, Friedrich Schiller Universitay Jena). Retrieved from http://www.db-thueringen.de/servlets/DerivateServlet/Derivate-17179/Risch/Dissertation.pdf
  57. Risch, A. K., Strohmayer, C., Stangier, U. (2005). Fragebogen zum Psychologischen Wohlbefinden – PWB [Psychological Well-Being Scales – PWB]. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Psychology, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany.Google Scholar
  58. Ruch, W., Harzer, C., Proyer, R. T., Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2010). Ways to happiness in German-speaking countries: The adaptation of the German version of the orientations to happiness questionnaire in paper-pencil and internet samples. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 26, 224–231. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ruch, W., Proyer, R. T., Harzer, C., Park, N., Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2010). Values in Action Inventory of Strengths (VIA-IS): Adaptation and validation of the German version and the development of a peer-rating form. Journal of Individual Differences, 31, 138–149. doi: 10.1027/1614-0001/a000022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Ruch, W., Proyer, R. T., & Weber, M. (2010). Humor as character strength among the elderly: Empirical findings on age-related changes and its contribution to satisfaction with life. Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 43, 13–18. doi: 10.1007/s00391-009-0090-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Ruch, W., Weber, M., Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2014). Character strengths in children and adolescents: Reliability and initial validity of the German Values in Action Inventory of Strengths for Youth (German VIA-Youth). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 30, 57–64. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069–1081. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Ryff, C. D. (2014). Psychological well-being revisited: Advances in the science and practice of eudaimonia. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 83, 10–28. doi: 10.1159/000353263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Ryff, C. D., & Essex, M. J. (1992). The interpretation of life experiences and well-being: The sample case of relocation. Psychology and Aging, 7, 507–517. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.7.4.507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 719–727. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. H. (2008). Know thyself and become what you are: A eudaimonic approach to psychological wellbeing. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 13–39. doi: 10.1007/s10902-006-9019-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Salama-Younes, M., Ismaïl, A., Montazeri, A., & Roncin, C. (2011). Factor structure of the French Ryff’s psychological well-being scales for active older adults. In I. Brdar (Ed.), The human pursuit of well-being: A cultural approach (pp. 203–2012). New York: Springer Science+Business Media. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-1375-8_17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Sandín, B., Chorot, P., Lostao, L., Joiner, T. E., Santed, M. A., & Valiente, R. M. (1999). Escala PANAS de afecto positivo y negativo: validación factorial y convergencia transcultural [The PANAS Scales of positive and negative affect: Factor analytic validation and cross-cultural convergence]. Psicothema, 11, 37–51.Google Scholar
  70. Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Authentic happiness: Using the new positive psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfillment. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  71. Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  72. Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55, 5–14. doi: 10.1037//0003-066X.55.1.5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Seligman, M. E. P., Steen, T. A., Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2005). Positive psychology progress: Empirical validation of interventions. American Psychologist, 60, 410–421. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.60.5.410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Sheldon, K. M., & Elliot, A. J. (1999). Goal striving, need satisfaction, and longitudinal well-being: The self-concordance model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 482–497. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.76.3.482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Sheldon, K. M., & Niemiec, C. P. (2006). It’s not just the amount that counts: Balanced need satisfaction also affects well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 331–341. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.91.2.331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Shimai, S., Otake, K., Park, N., Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2006). Convergence of character strengths in American and Japanese young adults. Journal of Happiness Studies, 7, 311–322. doi: 10.1007/s10902-005-3647-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Tangey, J. P. (2000). Humility: Theoretical perspectives, empirical findings and directions for future research. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19, 70–82. doi: 10.1521/jscp.2000.19.1.70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Van Dierendonck, D. (2005). The construct validity of Ryff’s scales of psychological well-being and its extension with spiritual well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 629–643. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00122-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Weber, M., Ruch, W., LittmanOvadia, H., Lavy, S., & Gai, O. (2013). Relationships among higher-order strengths-factors, subjective well-being, and general self-efficacy – The case of Israeli adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 55, 322–327. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2013.03.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wood, A. M., Linley, A. P., Maltby, J., Kashdan, T. B., & Hurling, R. (2011). Using personal and psychological strengths leads to increases in well-being over time: A longitudinal study and the development of the strengths use questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 15–19. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.08.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Yanez, A. P. (2007). Character strengths and psychological well-being as predictors of life satisfaction among multicultural populations (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3244003).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Section on Psychological Assessment, Department of PsychologyUniversity of KasselKasselGermany

Personalised recommendations