Skip to main content

Gender Equality in Academic Career Progression: A Matter of Time?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Changing Role of Women in Higher Education

Abstract

The twenty-first century has seen the reduction of gender inequalities in the academic profession rise up European, national and institutional policy agendas. Significant progress has been made in policy analyses of the barriers to equality and programmes for change have multiplied. However, the profession is still characterised by strong vertical gender segregation The contention that gender equality in the academic profession is simply ‘a matter of time’ is called into question in this chapter. Drawing on a range of higher education research studies undertaken in the last two decades, it suggests that such a contention can be justified only in terms of more complex understandings of time and its social, cultural and psychological dimensions. Their importance has been further underlined by changes in information and communication technologies and the impacts on academics of ‘fast time’, compressed time and space-time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The primary aim of this comparative research project, carried out in 2008 and 2009, was to explore perceptions of gender equality among female academics in British and German universities. The study used quantitative and qualitative methods but this chapter draws on the qualitative data. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a total of 87 female academics in five universities in each country and four disciplinary areas (biological sciences; economics, finance and management, education and history). For full details of the methodology and findings, see Pritchard (2010a, b).

References

  • Adam, B. (1990). Time and social theory. Cambridge/Oxford: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adam, B. (2004). Time. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen Collinson, J. (2004). Occupational identity on the edge: Social science contract researchers in higher education. Sociology, 38(2), 313–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archer, L. (2008). The new neoliberal subjects? Young/er academics’ constructions of professional identity. Journal of Education Policy, 23(3), 265–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, P., & Barret, L. (2013). Promoting positive gender outcomes in higher education through active workload management. Manchester: University of Salford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Equality Challenge Unit. (2014). Equality in higher education: Statistical report, ECU.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2012). In Caprile, M (Ed.), Meta-analysis of gender and science research: synthesis report. European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2013). She figures 2012: Gender in research and innovation. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galligan, Y. (2014). ‘Making sex the dependent variable: Mainstreaming gender equality in higher education’, address to ‘Equate Scotland’ conference, let’s talk about sex: Developing and supporting your female STEM students and staff. Edinburgh, Napier University, 14 May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • House of Commons Science and Technology Committee. (2014). Women in scientific careers, Sixth Report of Session 2013–14, HC 701.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howie, G., & Tauchert, A. (2002). Institutional discrimination and the “Cloistered’ Academic Ideal”. In G. Howie & A. Tauchert (Eds.), Gender, teaching and research in higher education (pp. 59–72). Basingstoke: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leisyte, L., & Hosch-Dayican, B. (2014). Changing academic roles and shifting gender inequalities: A case analysis of the influence of the research-teaching nexus on the academic career prospects of female academics in the Netherlands. Journal of Workplace Rights, 17(4–5), 467–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menzies, H., & Newson, J. (2008). Time, stress and intellectual engagement in academic work: Exploring gender difference. Gender, Work and Organization, 15(5), 504–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mὕller. (2006). In M. A. D. Sagaria (Ed.), Women, universities and change: Gender equality in the European Union and the United States. New York/Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neave, G. (2006). On time and fragmentation: Sundry observations on research, university and politics from a waveringly historical perspective. In G. Neave, K. Blὔckert, & T. Nybom (Eds.), The European Research University: An historical parenthesis? New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newsome, J. L. (2013). The Chemistry PhD: Impact on women’s retention, a report for the UK resource centre for women in SET and the royal society of Chemistry (Quoted in Galligan, Y. (2013)).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard, R. M. O. (2007). Gender inequality in British and German Universities. Compare, 37(5), 651–669.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard, R. M. O. (2010a). Gender inequality in British and German Universities: A qualitative study. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 40(4), 513–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard, R. M. O. (2010b). Attitudes to gender equality issues in British and German Academia. Higher Education Management and Policy, 22(2), 37–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard, R. M. O., & Henkel, M. (2011). New public management, academic time and gender inequality. In R. Pritchard (Ed.), Neoliberal developments in higher education: The United Kingdom and Germany. Oxford: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Probert, B. (2005). I just couldn’t fit it in. Gender, Work and Organization, 12(1), 50–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rees, T. (2006). Pushing the gender equality agenda forward in the European Union. In M. A. D. Sagaria (Ed.), Women, universities and change: Gender equality in the European Union and the United States. New York/Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues Araujo, E. (2008). Technology, gender and time: A contribution to the debate. Gender, Work and Organization, 15(5), 477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (n.d.). Report of the economic and social council for 1997. A/52/3.18 September 1997, Accessed 25 Apr 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ylijoki, O.-H. (2013). Boundary-work between work and life in the high-speed university. Studies in Higher Education, 38(2), 242–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ylijoki, O.-H., & Mäntylä, H. (2003). Conflicting time perspectives in academic work. Time and Society, 12(1), 55–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mary Henkel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Henkel, M. (2017). Gender Equality in Academic Career Progression: A Matter of Time?. In: Eggins, H. (eds) The Changing Role of Women in Higher Education. The Changing Academy – The Changing Academic Profession in International Comparative Perspective, vol 17. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42436-1_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42436-1_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-42434-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-42436-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics