Abstract
Service learning is a valuable learning tool when properly integrated into educational settings, yet relatively little research explores this form of experiential education with preschool-aged children. A particular challenge is identifying developmentally-appropriate methods of reflection, a key component of service learning. The chapter will explore environmental stewardship in a Reggio-inspired preschool as a form of service learning in young children. We will demonstrate, through our own research as well as extant developmental theoretical frameworks, that affording young children positive relationships with nature cultivates the next generation of environmental stewards. Fostering environmental stewardship through developmentally-appropriate, engaging experiences is a unique form of service learning in that it connects with community values and needs on a local and global scale. Furthermore, it integrates with the Reggio Emilia early childhood pedagogical approach in which the environment is considered a “third educator.” Finally, this form of service learning provides opportunities for children to reflect through interactions with peers, intentional teacher guidance, regular interviews at school, photo-documentation of children’s ongoing experiences, and activities that demonstrate respect and valuing of the natural world including growing and eating their own food, recycling, picking up trash, and mindful meditation in natural outdoor environments.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Billig, S. H. (2002). Support for K-12 service-learning practice: A brief review of the research. Educational Horizons, 80(4), 184–189.
Bowne, M., Cutler, K., & DeBates, D. (2010). Pedagogical documentation and collaborative dialogue as tools of inquiry for pre-service teachers in early childhood education: An exploratory narrative. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10, 48–59.
Bringle, R., & Hatcher, J. (1999). Reflection in service learning: Making meaning of experience. In Campus Compact (Ed.), Introduction to service-learning toolkit (2nd ed., pp. 83–89). Providence, RI: Campus Compact.
Chawla, L. (2007). Childhood experiences associated with care for the natural world: A theoretical framework for empirical results. Children, Youth and Environments, 14, 144–170.
Chawla, L., & Rivkin, M. (2014). Early childhood education for sustainability in the United States of America. In J. Davis & S. Elliott (Eds.), Research in early childhood education for sustainability (pp. 248–265). New York: Routledge.
Chun, E. J., Hertzog, N. B., Gaffney, J. S., & Dymond, S. K. (2012). When service learning meets the project approach: Incorporating service learning in an early childhood program. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 10(3), 232–245.
Clements, D. (2001). Mathematics in the preschool. Teaching Children Mathematics, 7(5), 270–275.
Couse, L., & Chorzempa, B. (2005). Service learning: Field experience for advanced early childhood degree candidates. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 26, 47–58.
Davis, J. (2009). Revealing the research “hole” of early childhood education for sustainability: A preliminary survey of the literature. Environmental Education Research, 15(2), 227–241.
Davis, J. (2014). Examining early childhood education through the lens of education for sustainability: Revisioning rights. In J. Davis & S. Elliott (Eds.), Research in early childhood education for sustainability (pp. 21–37). New York: Routledge.
Davis, J., & Elliott, S. (2014). An orientation to early childhood education for sustainability and research – Framing the text. In J. Davis & S. Elliott (Eds.), Research in early childhood education for sustainability (pp. 1–17). New York: Routledge.
Edwards, C., & Willis, L. M. (2000). Integrating visual and verbal literacies in the early childhood classroom. Early Childhood Education Journal, 27(4), 259–265.
Edwards, C., Gandini, L., & Forman, G. (1998). The hundred languages of children: The Reggio-Emilia approach – Advanced reflections. Greenwich: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Edwards, C., Gandini, L., & Forman, G. (2012). The hundred languages of children: The Reggio-Emilia experience in transformation (3rd ed.). Santa Barbara: Praeger.
Elliot, S. (2014). Early childhood education for sustainability and natural outdoor playspaces. In J. Davis & S. Elliott (Eds.), Research in early childhood education for sustainability (pp. 127–142). New York: Routledge.
Eyler, J. (2002). Reflection: Linking service and learning—Linking students and communities. Journal of Social Issues, 58(3), 517–534.
Fair, C., & Delaplane, E. (2014). “It is good to spend time with older adults. You can teach them, they can teach you”: Second grade students reflect on intergenerational service learning. Early Childhood Education Journal, 42, 1–9.
Fair, C., Decker, A., & Hopkins, K. (2011). “To me it’s like having a kid, kind of”: Analysis of student reflections in a developmental mentoring program. Mentoring and Tutoring, 19, 301–317.
Fjørtoft, I. (2001). The natural environment as a playground for children: The impact of outdoor play activities in pre-primary school children. Early Childhood Education Journal, 29, 111–117.
Flick, U. (2006). Constant comparative method. In V. Jupp (Ed.), The Sage dictionary of social research methods (pp. 37–38). London: Sage.
Gandini, L. (2012). Connecting through caring and learning spaces. In C. Edwards, L. Gandini, & G. Forman (Eds.), The hundred languages of children: The Reggio-Emilia experience in transformation (3rd ed., pp. 317–341). Santa Barbara: Praeger.
Hägglund, S., & Johansson, E. M. (2014). Belonging, value conflicts and children’s rights in learning for sustainability in early childhood. In J. Davis & S. Elliott (Eds.), Research in early childhood education for sustainability (pp. 38–48). New York: Routledge.
Hatcher, J. A., & Bringle, R. G. (1997). Reflection: Bridging the gap between service and learning. College Teaching, 45(4), 153–158.
Hatcher, A., Bringle, R., & Muthiah, R. (2004). Designing effective reflection: What matters to service-learning? Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 11, 38–46.
Hewett, V. M. (2001). Examining the Reggio Emilia approach to early childhood education. Early Childhood Education Journal, 29(2), 95–100.
Inan, H. Z., Trundle, K. C., & Kantor, R. (2010). Understanding natural sciences education in a Reggio Emilia-inspired preschool. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 1186–1208. doi:10.1002/tea.20375.
Ji, O., & Stuhmcke, S. (2014). The project approach in early childhood education for sustainability: Exemplars from Korea and Australia. In J. Davis & S. Elliott (Eds.), Research in early childhood education for sustainability (pp. 158–179). New York: Routledge.
Kim, B. S., & Darling, L. F. (2009). Monet, Malaguzzi and the constructive conversations of preschoolers in a Reggio-inspired classroom. Early Childhood Education Journal, 37, 137–145.
Lindner, S. M., Powers-Costello, & Stegelin, D. A. (2011). Mathematics in early childhood: Research-based rational and practical strategies. Early Childhood Education Journal, 39, 29–37.
Louv, R. (2008). Last child in the woods: Saving our children from nature-deficit disorder. Chapel Hill: Algonquin Books.
Mische, P., & Harris, I. (2008). Environmental peacemaking, peacekeeping and peacebuilding. In M. Bajaj (Ed.), Encyclopedia of peace education. New York: Columbia University.
Prince, H., Allin, L., Sandseter, E. B. H., & Ärkemalm-Hagsér, E. (2013). Outdoor play and learning in early childhood from different cultural perspectives. Journal of Adventure Education & Outdoor Learning, 13, 183–188. doi:10.1080/14729679.2013.813745.
Rogoff, B., Paradise, R., Arauz, R. M., Correa-Chavez, M., & Angelillo, C. (2003). Firsthand learning through intent participation. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 175–203.
Sandseter, E. B. H. (2009). Affordances for risky play in preschool: The importance of features in the play environment. Early Childhood Education Journal, 36, 439–446. doi:10.1007/s10643-009-0307-2.
Sandseter, E. B. H. (2012). Restrictive safety or unsafe freedom? Norwegian ECEC practitioners’ perceptions and practices concerning children’s risky play. Child Care in Practice, 18, 83–101. doi:10.1080/13575279.2011.621889.
Torquati, J., & Ernst, J. A. (2013). Beyond the walls: Conceptualizing natural environments as “third educators”. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 34(2), 191–208.
UNICEF. (1989). United Nations convention on the rights of the child. Retrieved from www.unicef.org/crc/
Wilson, R. (2012). Nature and young children: Encouraging creative play and learning in natural environments (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vandermaas-Peeler, M., McClain, C., Fair, C. (2017). “If I’m in the Grass and These Boots Overflow, I Could Water the Plants”: Exploring the Natural World as Service Learning with Young Children. In: Heider, K. (eds) Service Learning as Pedagogy in Early Childhood Education. Educating the Young Child, vol 11. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42430-9_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42430-9_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-42428-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-42430-9
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)