Abstract
We compare diagrammatic representations of hierarchically ordered information in three different well-known application domains: organizational structure, folder and file structure, and calculation order in arithmetic expressions. Although there exists a natural link between hierarchies and trees, the diagrams conventionally associated with these domains are the tree diagram, indentation, and nested parentheses, respectively. To investigate the effects of inherent natural correspondence and convention on the production and comprehension of hierarchies, an experiment was set up. The results show that participants prefer tree representations for visualizing hierarchical structure of organizations and folders, but don’t construct trees for visualizing arithmetic hierarchy. In comprehension, differences were observed between the three interfaces for both response accuracy and response time. Trees performed best on accuracy. Parentheses took most time to process. When used in their conventional domain nested parentheses performed best. For trees and indentation, the results are less clear.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Green, T.R.: What kindergartners know about class inclusion hierarchies. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 57, 72–88 (1994)
Hegarty, M., Carpenter, P.A., Just, M.A: Diagrams in the comprehension of scientific texts. In: Ban, R., Kamil, M.L., Mosenthal, P., Pearson, P.D. (eds.) Handbook of Reading Research, vol. 2, pp. 641–668 (1991)
Hurley, S.M., Novick, L.R.: Solving problems using matrix, network, and hierarchy diagrams: the consequences of violating construction conventions. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 63, 275–290 (2010)
Körner, C.: Concepts and misconceptions in comprehension of hierarchical graphs. Learn. Instr. 15, 281–296 (2005)
Novick, L.R.: The importance of both diagrammatic conventions and domain-specific knowledge for diagram literacy in science: the hierarchy as an illustrative case. In: Barker-Plummer, D., Cox, R., Swoboda, N. (eds.) Diagrams 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4045, pp. 1–11. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Novick, L.R., Hurley, S.M.: To matrix, network, or hierarchy: that is the question. Cogn. Psychol. 42, 158–216 (2001)
Zacks, J., Tversky, B.: Bars and lines: a study of graphic communication. Mem. Cogn. 27, 1073–1079 (1999)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Bosveld-de Smet, L., Verheggen, RJ. (2016). Comparison of Diagrams in Producing and Understanding Hierarchies in Three Different Application Domains. In: Jamnik, M., Uesaka, Y., Elzer Schwartz, S. (eds) Diagrammatic Representation and Inference. Diagrams 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9781. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42333-3_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42333-3_23
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-42332-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-42333-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)