Skip to main content

Serre and the Riemann–Roch Problem

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
What is the Genus?

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mathematics ((HISTORYMS,volume 2162))

  • 2196 Accesses

Abstract

Since the beginnings of the development of the theory of algebraic surfaces, geometers have tried to prove a generalization of the Riemann–Roch theorem for algebraic curves (see Zariski’s account in [195, Chap. IV], as well as Gray ’s article [84]). Max Noether formulated such a generalization in his 1886 paper [144]. But he could only prove an inequality (I use the notations and the explanations from [32, Chaps. 7 and 35])

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This means that |C| is contained in the canonical system |K|.

  2. 2.

    This is the arithmetic genus of the curve C, which may be computed using the adjunction formula stated in Theorem 37.2.

  3. 3.

    This is the number of varying intersection points of two general curves of the system, that is, the number of such points which are not base points of the system.

  4. 4.

    A little later, it became usual to denote this group rather by \(H^{1}(\mathcal{O}_{X}(C))\), if X is the ambient surface. Here \(\mathcal{O}_{X}(C)\) is the now standard notation for the sheaf denoted by F C in Serre’s letter to Borel.

References

  1. G. Castelnuovo, F. Enriques, Sur quelques récents résultats dans la théorie des surfaces algébriques. Math. Ann. 48, 241–316 (1897)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. J. Gray, The Riemann–Roch theorem and geometry, 1854–1914, in Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians, vol. III (Documenta Mathematica, Bielefeld, 1998), pp. 811–822

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. M. Noether, Extension du théorème de Riemann–Roch aux surfaces algébriques. C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris 103, 734–737 (1886)

    Google Scholar 

  4. J.-P. Serre, Un théorème de dualité. Commun. Math. Helv. 29 (1), 9–26 (1955). Republished in Œuvres I (Springer, New York, 2003), pp. 292–309

    Google Scholar 

  5. J.-P. Serre, Lettre à Armand Borel du 16 avril 1953, in Œuvres I (Springer, New York, 2003), pp. 243–250

    Google Scholar 

  6. O. Zariski, Algebraic Surfaces (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1935). Reprinted in 1971 with appendices by S.S. Abhyankar, J. Lipman and D. Mumford

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Popescu-Pampu, P. (2016). Serre and the Riemann–Roch Problem. In: What is the Genus?. Lecture Notes in Mathematics(), vol 2162. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42312-8_44

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics