Computer Assisted Detection of Breast Lesions in Magnetic Resonance Images

  • Vitoantonio BevilacquaEmail author
  • Maurizio Triggiani
  • Maurizio Dimatteo
  • Giuseppe Bellantuono
  • Antonio Brunetti
  • Leonarda Carnimeo
  • Francescomaria Marino
  • Michele Telegrafo
  • Marco Moschetta
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9771)


Nowadays preventive screening policies and increased awareness initiatives are up surging the workload of radiologists. Due to the growing number of women undergoing first-level screening tests, systems that can make these operations faster and more effective are required. This paper presents a Computer Assisted Detection system based on medical imaging techniques and capable of labeling potentially cancerous breast lesions. This work is based on MRIs performed with morphological and dynamic sequences, obtained and classified thanks to the collaboration of the specialists from the University of Bari Aldo Moro (Italy). A first set of 60 images was acquired without Contrast Method for each patient and, subsequently, 100 more slices were taken with Contrast Method. This article formally describes the techniques adopted to segment these images and extract the most significant features from each Region of Interest (ROI). Then, the underlying architecture of the suggested Artificial Neural Network (ANN) responsible of identifying suspect lesions will be presented. We will discuss the architecture of the supervised neural network based on the algorithm named Robust Error Back Propagation, trained and optimized so to maximize the number of True Positive ROIs, i.e., the actual tumor regions. The training set, built with physicians’ help, consists of 94 lesions and 3700 regions of any interest extracted with the proposed segmentation technique. Performances of the ANN, trained using 60 % of the samples, are evaluated in terms of accuracy, sensitivity and specificity indices. In conclusion, these tests show that a supervised machine learning approach to the detection of breast lesions in Magnetic Resonance Images is consistent, and shows good performance, especially from a False Negative reduction perspective.


Medical image classification Artificial neural networks Breast lesions detection Decision support systems 


  1. 1.
    US Cancer Statistics Working Group, et al.: United States Cancer Statistics: 1999–2010 Incidence and Mortality Web-Based Report, Atlanta: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers For Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wolberg, W.H., Street, W.N., Mangasarian, O.L.: Image analysis and machine learning applied to breast cancer diagnosis and prognosis. Anal. Quant. Cytol. Histol. 17(2), 77–87 (1995)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wolberg, W.H., Street, W.N., Mangasarian, O.L.: Breast cytology diagnosis via digital image analysis. Anal. Quant. Cytol. Histol. 15(6), 396–404 (1993)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mangasarian, O.L., Street, W.N., Wolberg, W.H.: Breast cancer diagnosis and prognosis via linear programming. Oper. Res. 43(4), 570–577 (1995)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bevilacqua, V., Mastronardi, G., Menolascina, F.: Hybrid data analysis methods and artificial neural network design in breast cancer diagnosis: IDEST experience. In: International Conference on Computational Intelligence for Modelling, Control and Automation, 2005 and International Conference on Intelligent Agents, Web Technologies and Internet Commerce, vol. 2, pp. 373–378. IEEE (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wolberg, W.H., Street, W.N., Heisey, D.M., Mangasarian, O.L.: Computer derived nuclear features distinguish malignant from benign breast cytology. Hum. Pathol. 26(7), 792–796 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bevilacqua, V., Mastronardi, G., Menolascina, F., Pannarale, P., Pedone, A.: A novel multi-objective genetic algorithm approach to artificial neural network topology optimisation: the breast cancer classification problem. In: International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, 2006, IJCNN 2006, pp. 1958–1965. IEEE (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bevilacqua, V.: Three-dimensional virtual colonoscopy for automatic polyps detection by artificial neural network approach: new tests on an enlarged cohort of polyps. Neurocomputing 116, 62–75 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Heywang-Köbrunner, S.H., Katzberg, R.W.: Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast. Invest. Radiol. 29(1), 94–104 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Orel, S.G., Schnall, M.D., Livolsi, V.A., Troupin, R.H.: Suspicious breast lesions: MR imaging with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology 190(2), 485–493 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Huang, W., Fisher, P.R., Dulaimy, K., Tudorica, L.A., Ohea, B., Button, T.M.: Detection of breast malignancy: diagnostic MR protocol for improved specificity. Radiology 232(2), 585–591 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kuhl, C.K.: MRI of breast tumors. Eur. Radiol. 10(1), 46–58 (2000)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Baum, F., Fischer, U., Vosshenrich, R., Grabbe, E.: Classification of hypervascularized lesions in CE MR imaging of the breast. Eur. Radiol. 12(5), 1087–1092 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hoffmann, U., Brix, G., Knopp, M.V., Hess, T., Lorenz, W.J.: Pharmacokinetic mapping of the breast: a new method for dynamic MR mammography. Magn. Reson. Med. 33(4), 506–514 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Degani, H., Gusis, V., Weinstein, D., Fields, S., Strano, S.: Mapping pathophysiological features of breast tumors by MRI at high spatial resolution. Nat. Med. 3(7), 780–782 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Orel, S.G.: High-resolution MR imaging for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer. Radiographics 18(4), 903–912 (1998)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Belli, P., Costantini, M., Bufi, E., Magistrelli, A., La Torre, G., Bonomo, L.: Diffusion-weighted imaging in breast lesion evaluation. La Radiologia Medica 115(1), 51–69 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kul, S., Cansu, A., Alhan, E., Dinc, H., Gunes, G., Reis, A.: Contribution of diffusion-weighted imaging to dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the characterization of breast tumors. Am. J. Roentgenol. 196(1), 210–217 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Moschetta, M., Telegrafo, M., Rella, L., Capolongo, A., Ianora, A.A.S., Angelelli, G.: MR evaluation of breast lesions obtained by diffusion-weighted imaging with background body signal suppression (DWIBS) and correlations with histological findings. Magn. Reson. Imaging 32(6), 605–609 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fobben, E.S., Rubin, C.Z., Kalisher, L., Dembner, A.G., Seltzer, M.H., Santoro, E.J.: Breast MR imaging with commercially available techniques: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology 196(1), 143–152 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kuhl, C.K., Schild, H.H., Morakkabati, N.: Dynamic bilateral contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: trade-off between spatial and temporal resolution. Radiology 236(3), 789–800 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kuhl, C.K., Mielcareck, P., Klaschik, S., Leutner, C., Wardelmann, E., Gieseke, J., Schild, H.H.: Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? Radiology 211(1), 101–110 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Woods, K.S., Doss, C.S., Bowyer, K.W., Solka, J.L., Priebe, C.E., Kegelmeyer Jr., W.P.: Comparative evaluation of pattern recognition techniques for detection of microcalcifications in mammography. Int. J. Pattern Recognit. Artif. Intell. 7(06), 1417–1436 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Chawla, N.V., Bowyer, K.W., Hall, L.O., Philip Kegelmeyer, W.: SMOTE: synthetic minority over-sampling technique. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 16, 321–357 (2002)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kaur, H., Singh Salaria, D.: Bayesian regularization based neural network tool for software effort estimation. GJSFR-D: Agric. Vet. 13(2), 45–50 (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vitoantonio Bevilacqua
    • 1
    Email author
  • Maurizio Triggiani
    • 1
  • Maurizio Dimatteo
    • 1
  • Giuseppe Bellantuono
    • 1
  • Antonio Brunetti
    • 1
  • Leonarda Carnimeo
    • 1
  • Francescomaria Marino
    • 1
  • Michele Telegrafo
    • 2
  • Marco Moschetta
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Electrical and Information EngineeringTechnical University of BariBariItaly
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyUniversity of BariBariItaly

Personalised recommendations