Advertisement

Detecting Ventricular Fibrillation and Ventricular Tachycardia for Small Samples Based on EMD and Symbol Entropy

  • Yingda Wei
  • Qingfang MengEmail author
  • Qiang Zhang
  • Dong Wang
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9771)

Abstract

In this paper, we proposed a new method based on Symbol Entropy and Empirical Mode Decomposition (EMD) to detect ventricular fibrillation (VF) and ventricular tachycardia (VT). Initially, we applied the EMD to decompose VF and VT signals into five sub-bands respectively. And then, we calculated the Symbol Entropy of each sub-bans as the feature to detect VT and VF. We employed the public data set to assess the proposed method. Experimental results showed that, using classification of support vector machine (SVM), the proposed method can successfully distinguish VF from VT with the classification accuracy up to 100 % based on small samples. The duration of each sample was 2 s. Moreover, the classification accuracy of the proposed method is far higher than the classification accuracy of the original signals using Symbol Entropy directly.

Keywords

Symbol entropy EMD VF VT SVM Small samples 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61201428, 61302128), the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province, China (Grant Nos. ZR2010FQ020, ZR2013FL002), the Shandong Distinguished Middle-aged and Young Scientist Encourage and Reward Foundation, China (Grant Nos. BS2009SW003, BS2014DX015).

References

  1. 1.
    Othman, M.A., Safri, N.M., Ghani, I.A.: A new semantic mining approach for detecting ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation. Biomed. Sig. Process. Control 8(2), 222–227 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kong, D.R., Xie, H.B.: Use of modified sample entropy measurement to classify ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Measurement 44(3), 653–662 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Thakor, N.V., Zhu, Y.S., Pan, K.Y.: Ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation detection by a sequential hypothesis testing algorithm. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 37(9), 837–843 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhang, X.S., Zhu, Y.S., Thakor, N.V., Wang, Z.Z.: Detecting ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation by complexity measure. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 46(5), 548–555 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhang, H.X., Zhu, Y.S., Xu, Y.H.: Complexity information based analysis of pathological ECG rhythm for ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation. Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos 12(10), 2293–2303 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhang, H.X., Zhu, Y.S.: Qualitative chaos analysis for ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation based on symbol complexity. Med. Eng. Phys. 23(8), 523–528 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Owis, M.I., Abou-Zied, A.H., Youssef, A.B.M.: Study of features based on nonlinear dynamical modeling in ECG arrhythmia detection and classification. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 49(7), 733–736 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fleisher, L.A., Pincus, S.M.S., Rosenbaum, H.: Approximate entropy of heart rate as a correlate of postoperative ventricular dysfunction. Anesthesiology 78(4), 683–692 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tong, S., Bezerianos, A., Paul, J., Thakor, N.: Nonextensive entropy measure of EEG following brain injury from cardiac arrest. Phys. A 305(3), 619–628 (2002)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gamero, L.G., Plastino, A., Torres, M.E.: wavelet analysis and nonlinear dynamics in a non extensive setting. Phys. A 246(3), 487–509 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tsallis, C.: Possible generalization of Boltzmann-Gibbs statistics. J. Stat. Phys. 52, 479–487 (1988)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sherman, L.D., Callaway, C.W., Menegazzi, J.J.: Ventricular fibrillation exhibits dynamical properties and self-similarity. Resuscitation 47(2), 163–173 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang, J., Chen, J.: Symbol dynamics of ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation. Phys. A 389(10), 2096–2100 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Owis, M.I., Abou-Zied, A.H., Youssef, A.B.M., Kadah, Y.M.: Study of features based on nonlinear dynamical modeling in ECG arrhythmia detection and classification. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 49, 733–736 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pachori, R.B., et al.: Analysis of normal and epileptic seizure EEG signals using empirical mode decomposition. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 104, 373–381 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Xia, D., Meng, Q., Chen, Y., Zhang, Z.: Classification of ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation based on the Lempel-Ziv complexity and EMD. In: Huang, D.-S., Han, K., Gromiha, M. (eds.) ICIC 2014. LNCS, vol. 8590, pp. 322–329. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yingda Wei
    • 1
    • 2
  • Qingfang Meng
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Qiang Zhang
    • 3
  • Dong Wang
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Information Science and EngineeringUniversity of JinanJinanChina
  2. 2.Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Network Based Intelligent ComputingJinanChina
  3. 3.Institute of Jinan Semiconductor Elements ExperimentationJinanChina

Personalised recommendations