Skip to main content

Abstract

In this work, tension and compression tests have been carried out on aluminium samples at low and high strain rate, the latter performed by means of a direct tension Hopkinson bar equipment. The parameters of the Johnson-Cook constitutive model have been identified using different approaches; the first method consists in the classical Finite Element Model Updating, where numerical simulations are repeated with different material parameters until the mismatch between the experimental and numerical load–displacement curves falls below an acceptable threshold.

The second method is based on the analysis of the digital images acquired by a fast camera during the tests; this permitted to calibrate the JC model by an analytical minimization procedure, without any FE simulation. A third inverse technique was also implemented, consisting in applying the FE model updating but using an enriched cost function, where also the mismatch between the numerical and acquired specimen shape profiles is included and minimized.

The advantages and drawbacks of the different techniques are assessed and compared.

This paper was presented during the SEM Annual Meeting in Costa Mesa, CA, June 2015

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hopkinson, B.: A method of measuring the pressure produced in the detonation of explosives or by the impact of bullets. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. 213, 437–456 (1914)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Davies, R.: A critical study of the hopkinson pressure bar. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. 240, 375–457 (1948)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Kolsky, H.: An investigation of the mechanical properties of materials at very high rates of load. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 62(11), 676–700 (1949)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Harding, J., Wood, E., Campbell, J.: Tensile testing of materials at impact rates of strain. J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 2(2), 88–96 (1960)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Staab, G., Gilat, A.M.O.S.: Exp. Mech. 31(3), 232–235 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nicholas, T.: Tensile testing at high rates of strain. Exp. Mech. 21(5), 177–185 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lewis, J.L., Campbell, J.: The development and use of a torsional Hopkinson-bar apparatus. Exp. Mech. 12(11), 520–524 (1972)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sasso, M., Newaz, G., Amodio, D.: Material characterization at high strain rate by Hopkinson bar tests and finite element optimization. Mater. Sci. Eng. A487, 289–300 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sedighi, M., Khandaei, M., Shokrollahi, H.: An approach in parametric identification of high strain rate constitutive model using Hopkinson pressure bar test results. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 527(15), 3521–3528 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rossi, M., Pierron, F.: Identication of plastic constitutive parameters at large deformations from three dimensional displacement fields. Comput. Mech. 49(1), 53–71 (2012)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Rossi, M., Pierron, F., Forquin, P.: Assessment of the metrological performance of an in situ storage image sensor ultra-high speed camera for full-field deformation measurements. Meas. Sci. Technol. 25(1), 025401 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chakrabarty, J.: Applied Plasticity, 2nd edn, pp. 161–163. Springer, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cross, L., Bless, A., Rajendran, E., Strader, E., Dawicke, D.: New technique to investigate necking in a tensile Hopkinson Bar. Exp. Mech. 24(3), 184–186 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dunnett, T., Balint, D., MacGillivray, H., Church, P., Gould, P.: Scale effects in necking. EPJ Web Conf. 26, 01008 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sasso, M., Fardmoshiri, M., Mancini, E., Rossi, M., Cortese, L.: High speed imaging for material parameters calibration at high strain rate. Eur Phys J Special Topics, 225(2), 295–309 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chen, W., Song, B.: Split Hopkinson (Kolsky) Bar, Design, Testing and Applications. Mechanical engineering series, pp. 11–17. Springer, New York (2011)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Cowper, P.S.G.: Strain hardening and strain rate effect in the impact loading of Cantilever beams. Brown University, Applied Mathematics Report (1958)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Klopp, R., Clifton, R.: Pressure-shear impact and the dynamic viscoplastic response of metals. Mech. Mater. 4(3), 375–385 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Litonski, J.: Plastic flow of a tube under adiabatic torsion. Bull. Acad. Pol. Sci. Ser. Sci. Tech. XXV, 7 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zerilli, F.J., Armstrong, R.W.: Deformation twinning and grain size aspects of numerical simulations of plastic flow. MRS Proc. 362 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Johnson, R., Cook, W.H.: A constitutive model and data for metals subjected to large strains, high strain rates and high temperatures. Int. Symp. Ballistics 7, 541–547 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Johnson, J., Cook, W.: Fracture characteristics of three metals subjected to various strains, strain rates, temperatures and pressures. Eng. Fract. Mech. 21(1), 31–48 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Meyers, M.A.: Dynamic Behavior of Materials. Wiley, New York (1994)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. “Abaqus FEA,” D S Simulia. © Dassault Systemes, 2004, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Han, S.: A globally convergent method for nonlinear programming. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 22, 297 (1977)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. MATLAB version 8.2. The MathWorks Inc., Natick (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Sasso .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Fardmoshiri, M., Sasso, M., Mancini, E., Chiappini, G., Rossi, M. (2017). Identification of Constitutive Model Parameters in Hopkinson Bar Tests. In: Quinn, S., Balandraud, X. (eds) Residual Stress, Thermomechanics & Infrared Imaging, Hybrid Techniques and Inverse Problems, Volume 9. Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42255-8_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42255-8_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-42254-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-42255-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics