SKARSE in Business Management

  • Stephen C. Clark
  • Theodora Valvi
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Democracy, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship for Growth book series (DIG)


Strategic knowledge arbitrage and serendipity (SKARSE) in business management is essential in a knowledge economy. There are various models which support this statement including strategies, architecture, resources, systems, technology, intellectual capital, and knowledge management. The chapter will also provide support to position SKARSE as a direct means for organizations and their respective leaders to navigate through the technological revolution. This includes advancements in information and communication technology (ICT), mobile technologies, and smartphone technologies. The chapter will conclude by linking all topics that have been introduced thus far, both individually and collectively.


  1. Antonelli, C. (2010). Working paper series: The economic complexity of technology and innovation. A review article of The nature of technology. What it is and how it evolves, by Arthur, W. B. Free Press, New York. Working Paper No. 3/2010, Department of Economics, Universita di Torino.Google Scholar
  2. Arrow, K. J. (1962). The economic implications of learning by doing. The Review of Economic Studies, 29(3), 155–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berman, E., & Machin, S. (2000). Skill-biased technology transfer around the world. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 16(3), 12–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carayannis, E. G. (2008). Knowledge-driven creative destruction, or leveraging knowledge for competitive advantage: Strategic knowledge arbitrage and serendipity as real options drivers triggered by co-opetition, co-evolution and co-specialization. Industry & Higher Education, 22(6), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carayannis, E. G. (2013). Strategic knowledge arbitrage and serendipity (SKARSE™) in action. The Voice of Technology, Winter, 34–35.Google Scholar
  6. Carayannis, E. G., & Stewart, M. R. (2013). Obsessed maniacs and clairvoyant oracles: Empirically validated patterns of entrepreneurial behavior. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 2(2), 1–24.Google Scholar
  7. Carayannis, E. G., Provance, M., & Givens, N. (2011). Knowledge arbitrage, serendipity, and acquisition formality: Their effects on sustainable entrepreneurial activity in regions. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 58(3), 564–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clough, G., Jones, A. C., McAndrew, P., & Scanlon, E. (2007). Informal learning with PDAs and Smartphones. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24, 359–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Danneels, E. (2007). The process of technological competence leveraging. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 511–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dosi, G., & Grazzi, M. (2010). On the nature of technologies: Knowledge, procedures, artifacts and production inputs. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34, 173–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eng, T. Y. (2005). The effects of learning on relationship value in a Business Network Context. Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing, 12(4), 67–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Foster, A., & Ford, N. (2003). Serendipity and information seeking: An empirical study. Journal of Documentation, 59(3), 321–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Freeman, C., Soete, L., & Efendioglu, U. (1995). Diffusion and the employment effects of information and communication technology: New technologies: Job creation and destruction. International Labour Organization, 134(4–5), 587–603.Google Scholar
  14. Geng, H., Lin, L., & Whinston, A. B. (2009). Effects of organizational learning and knowledge transfer on investment decisions under uncertainty. Journal of Management Information Systems, 26(2), 123–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hemp, P. (2009). Death by information overload: New research and novel techniques offer a lifetime to you and your organization. Harvard Business Review, 3, 83–89.Google Scholar
  16. Holtshouse, D. (2009). The future of knowledge workers. KM World, 18(9), 1–18.Google Scholar
  17. Huang, E. Y., & Wei Lin, S. (2009). Do knowledge workers use e-mail wisely? Journal of Computer Information Systems, 50(1), 65–73.Google Scholar
  18. Huseby, T., & Chou, S. T. (2003). Applying a knowledge-focused management philosophy to immature economies. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 103(2), 126–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ibarra, H., & Hunter, M. (2007). How leaders create and use networks. Harvard Business Review, 85(1), 40–47.Google Scholar
  20. Ito, K., & Lechevalier, S. (2010). Why some firms persistently out-perform others: Investing the interactions between innovation and exporting strategies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(6), 1997–2039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jafari, M., Akhavan, P., & Ashraf, M. (2009). A review on knowledge management discipline. Journal of Knowledge Management Practice, 10(1), 1–23.Google Scholar
  22. Kerin, R. A., Varadarajan, R., & Peterson, R. A. (1992). First-mover advantage: A synthesis, conceptual framework, and research propositions. Journal of Marketing, 56, 33–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kim, S. H. (2008). Moderating effects of job relevance and experience on mobile wireless technology acceptance: Adoption of a smartphone by individuals. Information Management, 45(6), 387–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  25. Liang, L. T., Huang, C. W., Yeh, Y. H., & Lin, B. (2007). Adoption of mobile technology in business: A fit-viability model. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 107(8), 1154–1169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Liaw, S. S., Hatala, M., & Huang, H. M. (2010). Investing acceptance toward mobile learning to assist individual knowledge management: Based on activity theory approach. Computers & Education, 54(2), 446–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Metaxiotis, K., Ergazakis, K., & Psarras, J. (2005). Exploring the world of knowledge management: Agreements and disagreements in the academic/practitioner community. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(2), 6–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., & Konno, N. (2000). SECI, ba and leadership: A unified model of dynamic knowledge creation. Long Range Planning, 33(1), 5–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pentland, D., Forsyth, K., Maciver, D., Walsh, M., Murray, R., Irvine, L., et al. (2011). Key characteristics of knowledge transfer and exchange in healthcare: Integrative literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 67(7), 1408–1425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Raento, M., Oulasvirta, A., & Eagle, N. (2009). Smartphones: An emerging tool for social scientists. Sociological Methods & Research, 37(3), 426–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rahmandad, H. (2008). Effect of delays on complexity of organizational learning. Management Science, 54(7), 1297–1312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sharples, M., Corlett, D., & Westmancott, O. (2002). The design and implementation of a mobile learning resource. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 6, 220–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Song, J., Almeida, P., & Wu, G. (2003). Learning-by-hiring: When is mobility more likely to facilitate interfirm knowledge transfer? Management Science, 49(4), 351–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15, 285–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Thomas, B., Sparkes, B. T., Brooksbank, D., & Williams, R. (2002). Social aspects of the impact of information and communication technologies on agri-food SMEs in Wales. Outlook on Agriculture, 31(1), 35–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Vavoula, G., & Sharples, M. (2009). Lifelong learning organisers: Requirements for tools for supporting episodic & semantic learning. Educational Technology & Society, 12(3), 82–97.Google Scholar
  38. Westerlund, M., & Rajala, R. (2010). Learning and innovation in inter-organizational network collaboration. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 25(6), 435–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zyl, A. S. (2009). The impact of social networking 2.0 on organizations. The Electronic Library, 27(6), 906–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephen C. Clark
    • 1
  • Theodora Valvi
    • 2
  1. 1.California State University, SacramentoSan DiegoUSA
  2. 2.Independent ResearcherAthensGreece

Personalised recommendations