Advertisement

France: Initiatives for Excellence

  • Emmanuel BoudardEmail author
  • Don F. WesterheijdenEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Global Higher Education book series (PSGHE)

Abstract

France’s higher education institutions hardly appeared in the first global university ranking, the 2003 Shanghai Ranking. This ‘Shanghai shock’, a term apparently coined by Dobbins (2012), was a prime occasion for the reforms in this case study, as it came at a time when the Bologna Process was already leading to changes. The aim of the chapter is to study the structural reforms in France with relevant conclusions regarding their design, implementation and evaluation, from the point of view of changing principles of governance: why and how did actors adopt new principles of action? France may have been a prime example of a state applying the rule of law ever since the republic stabilised on the principle of égalité, that is, at least since the establishment of the Fifth Republic in 1959 and in some sense as far back as the 1789 Révolution. In the area of higher education, Neave (1994, 1995) applied the term of ‘legal homogeneity’ to the higher education policies in many European countries, France definitely included among them, that characterised the welfare state: equal treatment of all higher education institutions each in their own legally defined classes of universities, grandes écoles, etc., mitigating or even denying differences in qualities among them.

Keywords

High Education High Education Institution High Education System Structural Reform High Education Policy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Attali, J. (1998). Pour un modèle européen d’enseignement supérieur. s.l. [Paris]: Ministère de l’éducation nationale, de la recherche et de la technologie.Google Scholar
  2. Aust, J., Crespy, C., Manifet, C., Musselin, C., & Soldano, C. (2008). Rapprocher, intégrer, différencier. Éléments sur la mise en place des pôles de recherche et d’enseignement supérieur. Rapport à la Délégation interministérielle à l’aménagement et à la compétitivité des territoires. s.l.Google Scholar
  3. Bleiklie, I. (1998). Justifying the evaluative state: New public management ideals in higher education. European Journal of Education, 33(3), 299–316.Google Scholar
  4. Carroll, L. (1981). The annotated alice. (M. Gardner, Trans.) Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  5. Cour des comptes. (2011). Les pôles de recherche et d’enseignement supérieur (PRES): Un second souffle nécessaire. Rapport public annuel 2011 305–333 Paris: Cour des Comptes Retrieved from https://www.ccomptes.fr/Publications/Publications/Rapport-public-annuel-2011.Google Scholar
  6. Dobbins, M. (2012). How market-oriented is French higher education? French Politics. 10, 134–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Espinoza, O. (2007). Solving the equity-equality conceptual dilemma: A new model for analysis of the educational process. Educational Research, 49(4), 343–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ferlie, E., Musselin, C., & Andresani, G. (2008). The ‘steering’ of higher education systems: A public management perspective. Higher Education, 56, 324–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Filâtre, D. (2004). Politiques publiques de recherche et gouvernance régionale. Revue Française D’administration Publique, 112(4), 719–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Finance, J.-P., Coilland, H., & Mutzenhardt, P. (2015). The experience with creating University of Lorraine by merging four former Universities. In A. Curaj, L. Georghiou, J. C. Harper, & E. Egron-Polak (Eds.), Mergers and alliances in higher education: International practice and emerging opportunities (pp. 221–242)). Dordrecht.: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gane, N. (2012). The governmentalities of neoliberalism: Panopticism, post-panopticism and beyond. Sociological Review, 60(4), 611–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Harfi, M., & Mathieu, C. (2006). Classement de Shanghai et image internationale des universities: Quels Enjeux Pour La France? Horizons Stratégiques, 2, 100–115.Google Scholar
  13. Kaiser, F. (2007). Higher education in France: Country report. International Higher education Monitor. Enschede: CHEPS, Center for Higher Education Policy Studies, University of Twente.Google Scholar
  14. Kingdon, J. W. (1984). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Boston: Little, Brown & Co.Google Scholar
  15. Legifrance. (2010). Convention du 23 septembre 2010 entre l’Etat et l’ANR relative au programme d’investissements d’avenir (action « initiatives d’excellence »). Retrieved from http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichTexte.do?cidTexte=JORFTEXT000022851283.
  16. Legifrance. (2014). Convention du 23 juin 2014 entre l’Etat et l’ANR second programme d’investissements d’avenir (action IDEX/I-SITE), JORF n°0151 du 2 juillet 2014 page 10906, texte n° 9. Retrieved from http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichTexte.do?cidTexte=JORFTEXT000029175500.
  17. Mignot-Gérard, S. (2012). Le gouvernement d’une université face aux « Initiatives d’Excellence »: Réactivité et micro-résistances. Politiques Et Management Public, 29(3), 519–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Neave, G. (1994). The politics of quality: Developments in higher education in Western Europe 1992-1994. European Journal of Education, 29(2), 115–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Neave, G. (1995). Homogenization, integration and convergence: The Cheshire cats of higher education analysis. In V. L. Meek, L. Goedegebuure, O. Kivinen, & R. Rinne (Eds.), The mockers and mocked: Comparative perspectives on differentiation, convergence and diversity in higher education (pp. 26–41). Oxford: PergamonGoogle Scholar
  20. Neave, G. (2012). The evaluative State, institutional autonomy and re-engineering higher education in Western Europe: The Prince and his pleasure. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Neave, G., & Van Vught, F. A. (1991). Prometheus bound: The changing relationship between Government and higher education in Western Europe. London: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  22. Olssen, M., & Peters, M. A. (2005). Neoliberalism, higher education and the knowledge economy: From the free market to knowledge capitalism. Journal of Education Policy, 20(3), 313–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public management reform: A comparative analysis: New public management, governance, and the neo-Weberian state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Sursock, A. E. (2015). Mergers and alliances in France: incentives, success factors and obstacles. In A. Curaj, L. Georghiou, J. C. Harper, & E. Egron-Polak (Eds.), Mergers and alliances in higher education: international practice and emerging opportunities (pp. 17–31)). Dordrecht.: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.La Rochelle ConsultLa RochelleFrance
  2. 2.Center for Hr Education Policy StudiesUniversity of TwenteEnschedeThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations