Partial Horizontal Differentiation in Croatian Higher Education: How Ideas, Institutions and Interests Shape the Policy Process
This chapter looks into the historical process of establishing and strengthening of the non-university sector in Croatia since the mid-1990s onwards and offers an account of its outcome. Initially, the process was part of the country’s broader efforts not only to ensure regionally balanced development, but also to improve quality, efficiency and accessibility to higher education. Since 2001, it was further embedded in broader higher education reform efforts, especially the implementation of the Bologna Process. This reform entailed, on the one hand, the establishment of non-university – professionally oriented – higher education institutions and, on the other hand, a gradual abolishment of professional study programmes in universities. The authors suggest that only a small part of the reform goals have been achieved, whereby some non-university institutions have been established and the number of students enrolled in professional programmes at universities has somewhat decreased. Effectively, the reform failed to align the distinction between types of higher education institutions and types of programmes, rendering the binary divide, at best, blurred. The authors argue that such outcome has been a result of, on the one hand, the governments’ reliance on formal regulation as the main policy instrument, which allowed for discretion in interpretation and enforcement of rules, and, on the other hand, the fact that the most dominant actor – universities – has continuously opposed the reforms.
KeywordsHigh Education Policy Instrument Policy Process High Education System Structural Reform
- Cvitan, M., Doolan, K., Farnell, T., & Matković, T. (2011). Socijalna i ekonomska slika studentskog života u Hrvatskoj: Nacionalno izvješće istraživanja EUROSTUDENT za Hrvatsku. Zagreb: Institut za razvoj obrazovanja.Google Scholar
- Doolan, K., Dolenec, D., & Domazet, M. (2011). Hrvatski sustav financiranja visokog obrazovanja u europskom kontekstu: Komparativna studija. Zagreb: Institut za razvoj obrazovanja.Google Scholar
- Kingdon, J. W. (2003). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
- Majone, G., & Wildavsky, A. (1984). Implementation as evolution. In J. L. Pressman & A. Wildavsky (Eds.), Implementation: How great expectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland; Or, why it’s amazing that federal programs work at all, this being a saga of the economic development administration as told by two sympathetic observers who seek to build morals on a foundation of ruined hopes (pp. 163–180). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Olsen, J. P. (1988). Administrative reform and theories of organization. In C. Campbell & G. B. Peters (Eds.), Organizing governance, governing organization (pp. 233–254). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
- Reichard, M. (1992). Politics and culture in Croatian higher education: A comparative perspective on educational reform. Community Services Catalyst, 22(4), 11–21.Google Scholar
- Thelen, K. A., & Mahoney, J. (2010). Explaining institutional change: Ambiguity, agency, and power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Zgaga, P. (2013). Higher education research and higher education policy in South-East Europe. European Journal of Higher Education, 1–15. doi: 10.1080/21568235.2013.819671.