Investigating the Experience of Moodle Adoption Through Expert Voices

  • Jane SinclairEmail author
  • Anne-Maria Aho
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 620)


Virtual learning environments (VLEs) such as Moodle are now widely used in universities and other organisations. One crucial factor in the successful employment of such platforms is the ability and commitment of teaching staff to adopt the system. Despite the importance of this role, there has been little work to examine the experience of using VLEs in practice. This paper presents initial, qualitative research aimed at understanding how Moodle is being used and the different experiences and perspectives of the staff involved. To generate themes and areas of interest for future investigation this paper uses interview data from two “expert witnesses” who have a deep understanding of how the platform is used. Emergent themes include: divergence between confident and basic users; the spread of usage within an academic community; lack of progression to innovative teaching methods.


Virtual learning environment Moodle Technology adoption 



We are immensely grateful to our expert witnesses who generously gave their time and shared their deep knowledge and insights relating to Moodle adoption and use.


  1. 1.
    Green, K.C.: New technology and higher education overview. J. Collect. Bargaining Acad. 8, 9 (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Costello, E.: Opening up to open source: looking at how Moodle was adopted in higher education. Open Learn. J. Open Distance e-Learn. 28(3), 187–200 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Martín-Blas, T., Serrano-Fernández, A.: The role of new technologies in the learning process: Moodle as a teaching tool in Physics. Comput. Educ. 52(1), 35–44 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sánchez, R.A., Hueros, A.D.: Motivational factors that influence the acceptance of Moodle using TAM. Comput. Hum. Behav. 26(6), 1632–1640 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Escobar-Rodriguez, T., Monge-Lozano, P.: The acceptance of Moodle technology by business administration students. Comput. Educ. 58(4), 1085–1093 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    MacKeogh, K., Fox, S.: Opening access to higher education to all? What motivates academic staff in traditional universities to adopt elearning? In: European Distance & eLearning Network 5th Research Conference (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Walker, S., Prytherch, D., Turner, J.: The pivotal role of staff user experiences in Moodle and the potential impact on student learning. In: Second International Conference on e-Learning and e-Technologies in Education (ICEEE), pp. 192–197. IEEE, September 2013Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gramp, J.: Beyond the baseline: working with e-learning champions to transform e-learning at a research-led university. In: Second Moodle Research Conference, pp. 24–32, October 2013Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Seluakumaran, K., Jusof, F.F., Ismail, R., Husain, R.: Integrating an open-source course management system (Moodle) into the teaching of a first-year medical physiology course: a case study. Adv. Physiol. Educ. 35(4), 369–377 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Agudo-Peregrina, Á.F., Iglesias-Pradas, S., Conde-González, M.Á., Hernández-García, Á.: Can we predict success from log data in VLEs? Classification of interactions for learning analytics and their relation with performance in VLE-supported F2F and online learning. Comput. Hum. Behav. 31, 542–550 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Drăgulescu, B., Bucos, M., Vasiu, R.: CVLA: integrating multiple analytics techniques in a custom moodle report. In: Dregvaite, G., Damasevicius, R. (eds.) ICIST 2015. CCIS, vol. 538, pp. 115–126. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cole, J., Foster, H.: Using Moodle: Teaching with the Popular Open Source Course Management System. O’Reilly, Sebastopol (2007)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bromham, L., Oprandi, P.: Evolution online: using a virtual learning environment to develop active learning in undergraduates. J. Biol. Educ. 41(1), 21–25 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Alves, G.R., Viegas, M.C., Marques, M.A., Silva, A., Costa-Lobo, M.C., Formanski, F., Silva, J.B.D.: Student performance analysis under different Moodle course designs. In: 15th International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL), pp. 1–5. IEEE, September 2012Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cohen, L., Manion, L., Morrison, K.: Research Methods in Education, 7th edn. Routledge, Abingdon (2011)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Baker, S.E., Edwards, R., Doidge, M.: How many qualitative interviews is enough?: Expert voices and early career reflections on sampling and cases in qualitative research. National Centre for Research Methods Review Paper (2012). Accessed 12 Oct 2015
  17. 17.
    Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13(3), 319–340 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Business and CultureSeinäjoki University of Applied SciencesSeinäjokiFinland

Personalised recommendations