Advertisement

Is a Virtual Learning Environment a One-Size-Fits-All Solution? A Survey of Cognitive Styles Within a University Student Population

  • Russell Barton
  • Jonathan FosterEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 620)

Abstract

Over the last decade, the large-scale introduction of Virtual Learning Environments (VLEs) into higher education has been a boon to learners and teachers alike. VLEs enable students to have ready access to digital materials before, during, and after classes; and to a platform for subsequent discussion. Over a number of years a body of evidence has emerged, suggesting that learners differ in their cognitive styles in significant ways; and that the matching/mismatching of instructional design with these styles can affect both how learners interact with materials and perform tasks, and learning outcomes. A survey based on a revised version of the Study Preferences Questionnaire [4] was distributed to students at a UK university in order to identify their style. 229 students returned the questionnaire. Of the respondents, 140 students were categorized as holists, 73 as serialists, and 16 as versatile. The implications of the prevalence of holists for instructional design are discussed. In a conclusion, it is suggested that research attention be given to a structure/structuring criterion as a way of exploring the matching/mismatching hypothesis; while the development of versatile rather than optimal information processing may also be a more productive educational goal.

Keywords

Virtual learning environments Cognitive styles Learning styles Holists/serialists Matching/mismatching Information processing 

References

  1. 1.
    Chen, S., Magoulas, G.D., Dimakopoulos, D.: A flexible interface design for web directories to accommodate different cognitive styles. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 56(1), 70–83 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dillenbourg, P., Schneider, D., Synteta, P.: Virtual learning environments. In: Dimitracopoulou, A. (ed.) 3rd Hellenic Conference “Information and Communication Technologies in Education”, Rhodes, Greece, pp. 3–18. Kastaniotis Editions, Greece (2002)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Entwistle, N.J.: Styles of Learning and Teaching. Wiley, London (1981)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ford, N.: Learning styles and strategies of postgraduate students. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 16(1), 65–77 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ford, N.: Levels and types of mediation in instructional systems: an individual differences approach. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 43(2), 241–259 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ford, N.: Cognitive styles and virtual environments. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 51(6), 543–557 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ford, N., Chen, S.Y.: Matching/mismatching revisited: an empirical study of learning and teaching styles. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 32(1), 5–22 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Goodale, P., Clough, P.D., Fernando, S., Ford, N., Stevenson, M.: Cognitive styles in an exploratory search system for digital libraries. J. Documentation 70(6), 970–996 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pask, G.: Conversation Theory: Applications in Education and Epistemology. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1976)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pask, G.: Final report of SSRC Research Programme HR2708. Richmond, Surrey: System Research Ltd. (1979)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pask, G.: Learning strategies, teaching strategies, and conceptual or learning style. In: Schmeck, R.R. (ed.) Learning Strategies and Learning Styles, pp. 83–99. Plenum Press, New York (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Paskand, G., Scott, B.C.E.: Learning strategies and individual competence. Int. J. Man-Machine Stud. 4(3), 217–253 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Paskand, G., Scott, B.C.E.: CASTE: a system for exhibiting learning strategies and regulating uncertainty. Int. J. Man-Machine Stud. 5, 17–52 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Riding, R., Cheema, I.: Cognitive styles—an overview and integration. Educ. Psychol. 11(3–4), 193–215 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Riding, R., Rayner, S.: Cognitive Style and Learning Strategies: Understanding Style Differences in Learning and Behaviour. Routledge, Oxford (2012)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Witkin, H.A.: Perception of the upright when the direction of the force acting on body is changed. J. Exp. Psychol. 40(1), 93 (1950)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Information SchoolUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK

Personalised recommendations