Three Curriculum Maturing Cycles in Academic Curriculum Management Systems

  • Kai PataEmail author
  • Kairit Tammets
  • Vladimir Tomberg
  • Mohammad Al-Smadi
  • Mart Laanpere
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 620)


The top-to-down and bottom-to-up processes in the semantic competence management of curriculum development in higher education context were investigated based on different semantic systems for curriculum management. As a result the paper proposes the framework and the three interrelated curriculum maturing cycles of (i) standards maturing, (ii) curriculum maturing and (iii) personal competence maturing in semantic systems for academic organizations.


Curriculum management Academic systems Curriculum maturing 


  1. Adam, S.: An introduction to learning outcomes. In: Froment, E., Kohler, J., Purser, L., Wilson, L. (eds.) EUA Bologna Handbook. Raabe, Berlin (2006)Google Scholar
  2. Angelov, S., Grefen, P., Greefhorst, D.: A framework for analysis and design of software reference architectures. Inf. Softw. Technol. 54, 417–431 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barrera, M., Montaño, N., Ramos, E.: An Ontological approach to support design competency-based curriculum. In: 2012 XXXVIII Conferencia Latinoamericana. En Informatica (CLEI), 1–5 Oct 2012, pp. 1–6 (2012)Google Scholar
  4. Bittencourt, I., Costa, E., Silva, M., Soares, E.: A computational model for developing semantic web-based educational systems. Knowl. Based Syst. 22, 302–315 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boud, D.: Creating a work-based curriculum. In: Boud, D., Solomon, N. (eds.) Work-Based Learning: A New Higher Education?. SRHE and Open University Press, Buckingham (2003)Google Scholar
  6. Brewster, C., O’Hara, K.: Knowledge representation with ontologies: the present and future. IEEE Intell. Syst. 19, 72–81 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brewster, C., O’Hara, K.: Knowledge representation with ontologies: Present challenges-future possibilities. Int. J. Human Comput. Stud. 65, 563–568 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cameron, I., Brickett, G.: A curriculum design, modelling and visualization environment. In: Proceedings of the 2012 AAEE Conference, Melbourne, Victoria (2012)Google Scholar
  9. Child, D.: Psychology and the Teacher, 7th edn. Continuum, Suffolk (2004)Google Scholar
  10. Devedzic, V.: Semantic Web and Education. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)Google Scholar
  11. Dexter, H., Davies, I.: An ontology-based curriculum knowledgebase for managing complexity and change. In: Ninth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (2009)Google Scholar
  12. Friedler, S.A., Shneiderman, B.: Enabling teachers to explore grade patterns to identify individual needs and promote fairer student assessment. Comput. Educ. 51, 1467–1485 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Furedi, F.: Where have all the Intellectuals Gone: Confronting 21st Century Philistinism. Continuum International Publishing, Suffolk (2004)Google Scholar
  14. He, Y., Hiu, S., Quan, T.: Automatic summary assessment for intelligent tutoring systems. Comput. Educ. 53, 890–899 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hsiao, H.C., Chen, C.S., Huang, K.K.: Practice based curriculum development for technical institute. In: School International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training, Kumamoto. Japan, pp. 451–457 (2001)Google Scholar
  16. IntelLEO project’s ontology framework (2011).
  17. Karunananda, A.S., Rajakaruna, G.M., Jayalal, S.: Using ontology for curriculum design and revision. In: Advances in ICT for Emerging Regions (ICTer) 2012, pp. 137–144 (2012)Google Scholar
  18. Kennedy, D., Hyland, A., Ryan, N.: Writing and Using Learning Outcomes: A Practical Guide. In: Bologna Handbook C 3.4-1 (2006).
  19. Lee, M., Tsai, K.H., Wang, T.I.: A practical ontology query expansion algorithm for semantic-aware learning objects retrieval. Comput. Educ. 50, 1240–1257 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lu, W.: Ontology-aware course management for curriculum evolution process in higher education. In: VERITE 13 March 2009 (2009)Google Scholar
  21. Paquette, G.: An ontology and a software framework for competency modeling and management. Educ. Technol. Soc. 10(3), 1–21 (2007)Google Scholar
  22. Pata, K., Tammets, K., Laanpere, M., Tomberg, V.: Design principles for competence management in curriculum development. In: Hernández-Leo, D., Ley, T., Klamma, R., Harrer, A. (eds.) EC-TEL 2013. LNCS, vol. 8095, pp. 260–273. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Roche, V.: Professional development models and transformative change: a case study of indicators of effective practice in higher education. Int. J. Acad. Dev. 6(2), 120–129 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ronchetti, M., Santi, J.: Curriculum Management and Review: an ontology-based solution. Technical report # DIT-07-021 (2007)Google Scholar
  25. Sampson, D., Fytros, D.: Competence models in technology-enhanced competence-based learning. In: Adelsberger, H.H., Kinshuk, J., Pawlowski, M., Sampson, D. (eds.) International Handbook on Information Technologies for Education and Training, 2nd edn. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)Google Scholar
  26. Spreckelsen, C., Finsterer, S., Cremer, J., Schenkat, H.: Can social semantic web techniques foster collaborative curriculum mapping in medicine? J. Med Internet Res. 15(8), e169 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Taba, H.: Curriculum Development: Theory and Practice. Harcourt, Brace & World, New York (1962)Google Scholar
  28. Tammets, K., Pata, K.: The trends and problems of planning outcome-based courses in elearning. In: Saar, E., Mõttus, R., Bern, E. (eds.) Higher Education at a Crossroad: The Case of Estonia, pp. 281–301. Peter Lang Publishers House (2013)Google Scholar
  29. van der Horst, H., McDonald, R.: Outcomes Based Education: A Teacher’s Manual. Kagisto Education Publishers, Cape Town (1999)Google Scholar
  30. Vaquero, J., Toro, C., Martín, J., Aregita, A.: Semantic enhancement of the course curriculum design process. In: Velásquez, J.D., Ríos, S.A., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C. (eds.) KES 2009, Part I. LNCS, vol. 5711, pp. 269–276. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Walker, D.F.: Fundamentals of Curriculum: Passion and Professionalism. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahjah (2003)Google Scholar
  32. Zervas, P., Sampson D.: The TEN competence observatory: an enabling technology for common description of competences. In: Proceedings of the 7th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, Niigata, Japan (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kai Pata
    • 1
    Email author
  • Kairit Tammets
    • 1
  • Vladimir Tomberg
    • 1
  • Mohammad Al-Smadi
    • 2
  • Mart Laanpere
    • 1
  1. 1.School for Digital TechnologyTallinnEstonia
  2. 2.Computer Science DepartmentJordan University of Science and TechnologyIrbidJordan

Personalised recommendations