Designing Technology-Based Tasks for Enhancing Mathematical Understanding Through Problem Solving

  • Fernando Barrera-Mora
  • Aaron Reyes-RodriguezEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 620)


In this paper, we propose some organizing principles that can be useful for high schools or bachelor mathematics teachers when designing technology-based instructional tasks. It is widely accepted that tasks are the most important aspect to promote students’ mathematical understanding, since tasks offer opportunities to attain relevant sensorial experiences fostering the construction of mental images as sources of meanings for mathematical concepts. In this vein, we reflect on the work developed by three bachelor mathematics teachers who participated in a problem solving seminar. The main points identified during task design involved recognizing how mathematical concepts are structured around the task, and which are needed to approach it, and proposing a hypothetical learning trajectory in which technology plays a role as amplifier and reorganizer of cognitive processes.


Tasks design Mathematical understanding Technology 


  1. 1.
    Watson, A., Minoru, O.: Themes and issues in mathematics education concerning task design: Editorial introduction. In: Watson, A., Ohtani, M. (eds.) Task Design in Mathematics Education: An ICMI Study 22, pp. 3–18. Springer, Cham (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schoenfeld, A.H.: Mathematical Problem Solving. Academic Press, Orlando (1985)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Naaranoja, Marja, Uden, Lorna: Eight R’s – case study. In: Uden, L., Liberona, D., Welzer, T. (eds.) LTEC 2015. CCIS, vol. 533, pp. 67–76. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pea, R.D.: Cognitive technologies for mathematics education. In: Schoenfeld, A. (ed.) Cognitive Science and Mathematics Education, pp. 89–122. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1987)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jensen, E.: Teaching with the Brain in Mind, 2nd edn. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Alexandria (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Beard, C., Wilson, J.P.: Experiential Learning: A Handbook for Education, Training and Coaching. KoganPage, London (2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zull, J.A.: The Art of Changing the Brain: Enriching the Practice of Teaching by Exploring the Biology of Learning. Stylus, Sterling (2002)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vygotsky, L.S.: Thought and Language. MIT Press, Cambridge (1962)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vygotsky, L.S.: Mind in Society: The Development of the Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1978)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Santos-Trigo, M., Reyes-Rodriguez, A., Espinosa-Perez, H.: Musing on the use of dynamic software and mathematics epistemology. TEAMAT 26(4), 167–178 (2007)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Polya, G.: How to Solve it. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1945)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Leung, A., Bolite-Frant, J.: Designing mathematics tasks: the role of tools. In: Watson, A., Ohtani, M. (eds.) Tasks Design in Mathematics Education, pp. 191–228. Springer, Cham (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Santos-Trigo, M., Reyes-Rodriguez, A.: The use of digital technology in finding multiple paths to solve and extend an equilateral triangle task. Int. J. Math. Educ. Sci. Tech. 47(1), 58–81 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Santos-Trigo, M.: La Resolución de Problemas Matemáticos: Fundamentos Cognitivos. Trillas, México (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mathematics and Physics DepartmentAutonomous University of Hidalgo StatePachucaMexico

Personalised recommendations