Abstract
Using data from the Survey on Italian Household Income and Wealth (SHIW) gathered by the Bank of Italy, I test the effect of community banks on the probability of households becoming insolvent during the crisis. I find that a higher presence of community banks in local markets increases bankruptcies. This outcome is mainly driven by households living in small towns, where the competitive pressure from medium–large banks is lower. However, a higher use of transactional lending could mitigate the lower efficiency of community banks in screening and monitoring processes, while relationship lending does not seem to help community banks in loan underwriting procedures.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
In the first part of the 1990s state-owned banks had around 70 % of the market in terms of total assets, while more recently the share has been close to zero.
- 2.
In accordance with the Bank of Italy’s definition of small and very small banks, I consider community banks to be those institutions with total assets of up to €9 billion (the Federal Reserve’s definition is based on a threshold of $10 billion).
- 3.
Data and statistics described and analyzed in this chapter, when referring to individual characteristics, relate to those of the householder, that is the person earning the highest income.
- 4.
SHIW weights are constructed to account for imperfect coverage, for eligibility and for attrition because of households being interviewed in previous surveys (panel units).
- 5.
- 6.
Correlations between exogenous variables do not signal matters of colinearity.
References
Agarwal, S., & Hauswald, R. (2007). Distance and information asymmetries in lending decisions. Proceedings from Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, No. 1052.
Agarwal, S., Chomsisengphet, S., Liu, C., & Souleles, N. (2008). Benefits of relationship banking: Evidence from consumer credit markets. Proceedings from Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, No. 1079.
Berger, A. N., & Udell, G. F. (2006). A more complete conceptual framework for SME finance. Journal of Banking and Finance, 30(11), 2945–2966.
Berger, A. N., Miller, N. H., Petersen, M. A., Rajan, M. G., & Stein, J. C. (2005). Does function follow organizational form? Evidence from the lending practices of large and small banks. Journal of Financial Economics, 76(2), 237–269.
Bonaccorsi Di Patti, E., Gobbi, G., & Mistrulli, P. E. (2004). The interaction between face-to-face and electronic delivery: The case of the Italian banking industry. Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area, No. 508.
Bongini, P., Di Battista, M. L., & Zavarrone, E. (2007). The value of relationship lending: Small banks in an era of consolidation. Economic Notes, 36(3), 209–230.
Boot, A. W. (2000). Relationship banking: What do we know? Journal of Financial Intermediation, 9(1), 7–25.
Boyd, J. H., De Nicolo, G., & Loukoianova, E. (2009). Banking crises and crisis dating: Theory and evidence. IMF Working Papers, 141, 1–50.
Breevort, K. P., & Wolken, J. D. (2009). Does distance matter in banking? In A. Zazzaro, M. Fratianni, & P. Alessandrini (Eds.), The changing geography of banking and finance (pp. 27–56). New York: Springer US.
Degryse, H., & Ongena, S. (2005). Distance, lending relationships, and competition. Journal of Finance, 60(1), 231–266.
Deyoung, R., Glennon, D., & Nigro, P. (2008). Borrower–lender distance, credit scoring, and the performance of small business loans. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 17, 113–143.
EBA (European Banking Authority). (2013). EBA final draft implementing technical standards. On supervisory reporting on forbearance and non-performing exposures under article 99(4) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013.
Gobbi, G., & Sette, E. (2012). Relationship lending in a financial turmoil. Rome: Money and Finance Research Group, Working paper, (59).
Gross, D. B., & Souleles, N. S. (2002). An empirical analysis of personal bankruptcy and delinquency. Review of Financial Studies, 15(1), 319–347.
Hauswald, R., & Marquez, R. (2006). Competition and strategic information acquisition in credit markets. Review of Financial Studies, 19(3), 967–1000.
Masera, R. (2013). US Basel III final rule on banks’ capital requirements: A different-size-fits-all approach. PSL Quarterly Review, 66(267), 387–402.
Milani, C. (2014). Borrower–lender distance and loan default rates: Macro evidence from the Italian local markets. Journal of Economics and Business, 71, 1–21.
Norden, L., & Weber, M. (2010). Credit line usage, checking account activity, and default risk of bank borrowers. Review of Financial Studies, 23(10), 3665–3699.
Panetta, F. (2015). The transition towards a more stable financial system. Address by the Deputy Governor of the Bank of Italy.
Petersen, M., & Rajan, R. (2002). Does distance still matter? The information revolution in small business lending. Journal of Finance, 57, 2533–2570.
Puri, M., Rocholl, J., & Steffen, S. (2011). On the importance of prior relationships in bank loans to retail customers. European Central Bank, Working paper series, no. 1395.
Stein, J. C. (2002). Information production and capital allocation: Decentralized versus hierarchical firms. The Journal of Finance, 57(5), 1891–1921.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Milani, C. (2017). Community Banks and Lending Technologies: Evidence from the Italian Retail Market. In: Miklaszewska, E. (eds) Institutional Diversity in Banking. Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Banking and Financial Institutions. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42073-8_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42073-8_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-42072-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-42073-8
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)