Skip to main content

Supporting Variability Exploration and Resolution During Model Migration

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 9764))

Abstract

In Model-Driven Engineering (MDE) metamodels are pivotal entities that underpin the definition of models. Similarly to any software artifact, metamodels evolve over time due to evolutionary pressure. However, whenever a metamodel is modified, related models may become invalid and adaptations are required to restore their validity. Generally, when adapting a model in response to metamodel changes, more than one migration strategy is possible. Unfortunately, inspecting all of them, which greatly overlap one with another, can be prone to errors. In this paper, we present an approach supporting the identification of variability during model migration and selection of migration alternatives by generating an intensional and thus concise representation of all migration alternatives by including also an explicit visualization of conflicting solutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.adoxx.org.

  2. 2.

    http://eclipse.org/modeling/emf/.

  3. 3.

    http://www.metacase.com/products.html.

  4. 4.

    For the sake of clarity, abstract classes are depicted in gray.

  5. 5.

    Please note that each migration alternative is identified by a term like R1a1 where a1 is one of the possible migration alternative related to the metamodel change R1.

  6. 6.

    https://www.eclipse.org/epsilon/doc/modelink/.

References

  1. Batory, D.: Feature models, grammars, and propositional formulas. In: Obbink, H., Pohl, K. (eds.) SPLC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3714, pp. 7–20. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Bézivin, J., Jouault, F., Rosenthal, P., Valduriez, P.: Modeling in the large and modeling in the small. In: Aßmann, U., Akşit, M., Rensink, A. (eds.) MDAFA 2003. LNCS, vol. 3599, pp. 33–46. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Cicchetti, A., Di Ruscio, D., Pierantonio, A.: Managing dependent changes in coupled evolution. In: Paige, R.F. (ed.) ICMT 2009. LNCS, vol. 5563, pp. 35–51. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Cicchetti, A., Di Ruscio, D., Eramo, R., Pierantonio, A.: Automating co-evolution in model-driven engineering. In: Proceedings of EDOC, pp. 222–231. IEEE (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dam, H.K., Egyed, A., Winikoff, M., Reder, A., Lopez-Herrejon, R.E.: Consistent merging of model versions. J. Syst. Softw. 112, 137–155 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Di Ruscio, D., Iovino, L., Pierantonio, A.: Coupled evolution in model-driven engineering. IEEE Softw. 29(6), 78–84 (2012)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Di Ruscio, D., Iovino, L., Pierantonio, A.: Evolutionary togetherness: how to manage coupled evolution in metamodeling ecosystems. In: Ehrig, H., Engels, G., Kreowski, H.-J., Rozenberg, G. (eds.) ICGT 2012. LNCS, vol. 7562, pp. 20–37. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Di Ruscio, D., Paige, R.F., Pierantonio, A.: Guest editorial to the special issue on success stories in model driven engineering. Sci. Comput. Program. 89, 69–70 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Egyed, A., Letier, E., Finkelstein, A.: Generating and evaluating choices for fixing inconsistencies in UML design models. In: 23rd IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, pp. 99–108, September 2008

    Google Scholar 

  10. Famelis, M., Salay, R., Chechik, M.: Partial models: towards modeling and reasoning with uncertainty. In: Proceedings of ICSE, pp. 573–583, June 2012

    Google Scholar 

  11. Font, J., Arcega, L., Haugen, O., Cetina, C.: Addressing metamodel revisions in model-based software product lines. In: Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on GPCE, pp. 161–170. ACM (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Garcés, K., Jouault, F., Cointe, P., Bézivin, J.: Managing model adaptation by precise detection of metamodel changes. In: Paige, R.F., Hartman, A., Rensink, A. (eds.) ECMDA-FA 2009. LNCS, vol. 5562, pp. 34–49. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Herrmannsdoerfer, M.: COPE – a workbench for the coupled evolution of metamodels and models. In: Malloy, B., Staab, S., van den Brand, M. (eds.) SLE 2010. LNCS, vol. 6563, pp. 286–295. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Hutchinson, J., Whittle, J., Rouncefield, M., Kristoffersen, S.: Empirical assessment of MDE in industry. In: Proceedings of the ICSE, pp. 471–480. ACM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Körtgen, A.T.: New strategies to resolve inconsistencies between models of decoupled tools. In: 3rd Workshop on Living with Inconsistencies in Software Development, Bd, vol. 661, pp. 21–31 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kurtev, I., Bzivin, J., Aksit, M.: Technological spaces: an initial appraisal. In: CoopIS, DOA’2002 Federated Conferences, Industrial Track (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kusel, A., Etzlstorfer, J., Kapsammer, E., Retschitzegger, W., Schwinger, W., Schönböck, J.: Consistent co-evolution of models and transformations. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems (MODELS). IEEE, Ottawa, Canada (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lientz, B.P., Swanson, E.B.: Software Maintenance Management. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mantz, F., Taentzer, G., Lamo, Y.: Well-formed model co-evolution with customizable model migration. In: Electronic Communications of the EASST, vol. 58 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Parsons, J., Wand, Y.: Using objects for systems analysis. Commun. ACM 40(12), 104–110 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rose, L.M., Kolovos, D.S., Paige, R.F., Polack, F.A.C.: Model migration with epsilon flock. In: Tratt, L., Gogolla, M. (eds.) ICMT 2010. LNCS, vol. 6142, pp. 184–198. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Rose, L.M., Paige, R.F., Kolovos, D.S., Polack, F.A.C.: The epsilon generation language. In: Schieferdecker, I., Hartman, A. (eds.) ECMDA-FA 2008. LNCS, vol. 5095, pp. 1–16. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Salay, R., Chechik, M., Horkoff, J., Di Sandro, A.: Managing requirements uncertainty with partial models. Requirements Eng. 18(2), 107–128 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Schmidt, D.C.: Guest editor’s introduction: model-driven engineering. Computer 39(2), 25–31 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Schönböck, J., Kusel, A., Etzlstorfer, J., Kapsammer, E., Schwinger, W., Wimmer, M., Wischenbart, M.: CARE - a constraint-based approach for re-establishing conformance-relationships. In: Proceedings of the APCCM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Strüber, D., Rubin, J., Arendt, T., Chechik, M., Taentzer, G., Plöger, J.: RuleMerger: automatic construction of variability-based model transformation rules. In: Stevens, P., Wasowski, A. (eds.) FASE 2016. LNCS, vol. 9633, pp. 122–140. Springer, Heidelberg (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-662-49665-7_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Thüm, T., Kästner, C., Benduhn, F., Meinicke, J., Saake, G., Leich, T.: FeatureIDE: an extensible framework for feature-oriented software development. Sci. Comput. Program. 79, 70–85 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Van Lamsweerde, A.: Goal-oriented requirements engineering: a guided tour. In: Fifth IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering, pp. 249–262. IEEE (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wagelaar, D., Iovino, L., Di Ruscio, D., Pierantonio, A.: Translational semantics of a co-evolution specific language with the EMF transformation virtual machine. In: Hu, Z., de Lara, J. (eds.) ICMT 2012. LNCS, vol. 7307, pp. 192–207. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Wieland, K., Langer, P., Seidl, M., Wimmer, M., Kappel, G.: Turning conflicts into collaboration. Comput. Support. Coop. Work 22(2–3), 181–240 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juergen Etzlstorfer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Di Ruscio, D., Etzlstorfer, J., Iovino, L., Pierantonio, A., Schwinger, W. (2016). Supporting Variability Exploration and Resolution During Model Migration. In: Wąsowski, A., Lönn, H. (eds) Modelling Foundations and Applications. ECMFA 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9764. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42061-5_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42061-5_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-42060-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-42061-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics