Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Selection of Anesthesia Methods

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Anesthesia for Cesarean Section

  • 1273 Accesses

Abstract

General anesthesia is associated with substantially greater maternal risk than regional anesthesia due to difficult airway management or aspiration related deaths. Spinal and epidural anesthesia have therefore become more widely utilized for cesarean section. Spinal anesthesia is simple to institute, rapid in its effect, and produces excellent operating conditions. Continuous epidural analgesia is more titratable, may produce less hemodynamic changes, and can be topped up if surgery is prolonged or postoperative pain relief is required. Spinal anesthesia is the most commonly used technique for elective cesarean section where epidural is most used to convert labor epidural analgesia to surgical anesthesia. The introduction of combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA) may offer benefits of both spinal and epidural anesthesia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kinsella SM, Walton B, Sashidharan R, et al. Category-1 caesarean section: a survey of anaesthetic and peri-operative management in the UK. Anaesthesia. 2010;65:362–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bucklin BA, Hawkins JL, Anderson JR, et al. Obstetric anesthesia workforce survey: twenty-year update. Anesthesiology. 2005;103:645–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Staiku C, Paraskeva A, Karmaniolou I, et al. Current practice in obstetric anesthesia: a 2012 European survey. Minerva Anestesiol. 2014;80:347–35.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Committee on Obstetric Practice, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Committee opinion. Number 326, December 2005. Inappropriate use of the terms fetal distress and birth asphyxia. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106:1469–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Riley ET, Cohen SE, Macario A, et al. Spinal versus epidural anesthesia for cesarean section: a comparison of time efficiency, costs, charges, and complications. Anesth Analg. 1995;80:709–12.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fettes PD, Jansson JR, Wildsmith JA. Failed spinal anaesthesia: mechanisms, management, and prevention. Br J Anaesth. 2009;102:739–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ko JS, Kim CS, Cho HS, et al. A randomized trial of crystalloid versus colloid solution for prevention of hypotension during spinal or low-dose combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2007;16:8–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Carvalho B, Mercier FJ, Riley ET, et al. Hetastarch co-loading is as effective as pre-loading for the prevention of hypotension following spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2009;18:150–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Allen TK, George RB, White WD, et al. A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of four fixed rate infusion regimens of phenylephrine for hemodynamic support during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Anesth Analg. 2010;111:1221–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ngan Kee WD, Khaw KS, Tan PE, et al. Placental transfer and fetal metabolic effects of phenylephrine and ephedrine during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Anesthesiology. 2009;111:506–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hood DD, Curry R. Spinal versus epidural anesthesia for cesarean section in severely preeclamptic patients: a retrospective survey. Anesthesiology. 1999;90:1276–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sia A, Tiong A, Hian K, et al. Hyperbaric versus plain bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Anesth Analg. 2015;120:132–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ginosar Y, Mirikatani E, Drover DR, et al. ED50 and ED95 of intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine coadministered with opioids for cesarean delivery. Anesthesiology. 2004;100:676–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Carvalho B, Durbin M, Drover DR, et al. The ED50 and ED95 of intrathecal isobaric bupivacaine with opioids for cesarean delivery. Anesthesiology. 2005;103:606–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rucklidge MWM, Paech MJ. Limiting the dose of local anaesthetic for caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia—has the limbo bar been set too low? Anaesthesia. 2012;67:347–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Palmer CM. Continuous spinal anesthesia and analgesia in obstetrics. Anesth Analg. 2010;111:1476–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Js C, Davies P, Lewis M. Some aspects of epidural block provided for caesarean section. Anaesthesia. 1986;41:1039–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Capogna G, Celleno D, Zangrillo A. Analgesia e anestesia epidurale per il parto. Mosby Year Book Italia; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ng K, Parson J, Cyna AM, Middelton P. Spinal versus epidural anaesthesia for caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;2:CD003765.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kinsella SM. A prospective audit of regional anaesthesia failure in5080 caesarean sections. Anaesthesia. 2008;63:822–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hilliyard SG, Bate TE, Corcoran TB, et al. Extending epidural analgesia for emergency caesarean section: a meta analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2011;107:668–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ranasinghe JS, Steadman J, Toyama T, et al. Combined spinal epidural anaesthesia is better than spinal or epidural alone for caesarean delivery. Br J Anaesth. 2003;91:299–300.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sumikura H. When was the last time you induced general anesthesia for cesarean section? J Anesth. 2015;29:819–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hignett R, Fernando R. Anesthesia for the pregnant HIV patient. Anesthesiol Clin. 2008;26:127–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Butwick AJ, Carvalho B. Neuraxial anesthesia in obstetric patients receiving anticoagulant and antithrombotic drugs. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2010;19:193–201.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Afolabi BB, Lesi FE, Merah NA. Regional versus general anaesthesia for caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;10:CD004350.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Reynolds F, Seed PT. Anaesthesia for caesarean section and neonatal acid-base status: a meta-analysis. Anaesthesia. 2005;60:636–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Strouch ZY, Dakik CG, Wd W, et al. Anesthetic technique for cesarean delivery and neonatal acid–base status: a retrospective database analysis. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2015;24:22–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Datta S, editor. Anesthetic and obstetric management of high-risk pregnancy. 3rd ed. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Gambling DR, Douglas MJ, McKey RSF. Obstetric anesthesia and uncommon disorders. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  31. Langesaeter E, Dragsund M, Rosseland LA. Regional anaesthesia for a caesarean section in women with cardiac disease: a prospective study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2010;54:46–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Dresner M, Pinder A. Anaesthesia for caesarean section in women with complex cardiac disease: 34 cases using the Braun Spinocath spinal catheter. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2009;18:131–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Blaise G, Langleben D, Hubert B. Pulmonary arterial hypertension: pathophysiology and anesthetic approach. Anesthesiology. 2003;99:1415–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Vohra A, Kumar S, Charlton AJ, Olukoga AO, Boulton AJ, McLeod D. Effect of diabetes mellitus on the cardiovascular responses to induction of anesthesia and tracheal intubation. Br J Anaesth. 1993;71:258–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Lev-Ran A. Sharp temporary drop in insulin requirement after caesarean section in diabetic patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1974;120:905–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Hoeldtke RD, Boden G, Shuman CR, et al. Reduced epinephrine secretion and hypoglycemia unawareness in diabetic autonomic neuropathy. Ann Intern Med. 1982;96:459–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kawabata KM. Two cases of asthmatic attack caused by spinal anesthesia. Masui. 1996;45:102–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Drake E, Drake M, Bird J, et al. Obstetric regional blocks for women with multiple sclerosis: a survey of UK experience. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2006;15:115–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Leykin Y. Which anesthetic (general or regional) is safest for a caesarean section in a morbidly obese parturient? In: Leykin Y, Brodski JB, editors. Controversies in the anesthetic management of the obese surgical patient. Milan: Springer; 2013.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  40. Whitty RJ, Maxwell CV, Carvalho JC. Complications of neuraxial anesthesia in an extreme morbidly obese patient for cesarean section. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2007;16:139–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Polin CM, Hale B, Mauritz AA, et al. Anesthetic management of super-morbidly obese parturients for cesarean delivery with a double neuraxial catheter technique: a case series. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2015;24:276–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Dennis AT. Management of pre-eclampsia: issues for anaesthetists. Anaesthesia. 2012;67:1009–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Dyer RA, Piercy JL, Reed AR. The role of the anaesthetist in the management of the pre-eclamptic patient. Curr Opin Anesthesiol. 2007;20:168–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Lewis G, editor. The confidential enquiry into maternal and child health (CEMACH). Saving mothers’ lives: reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer 2003–2005. The seventh report on confidential enquiries into maternal deaths in the United Kingdom. London: CEMACH; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Palit S, Palit G, Vercauteren M, et al. Regional anaesthesia for primary caesarean section in patients with preterm HELLP syndrome: a review of 102 cases. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2009;36:230–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Chestnut DH, Dewan DM, Redick LF, et al. Anesthetic management for obstetric hysterectomy: a multiinstitutional study. Anesthesiology. 1989;70:607–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Munoz LA, Mendoza GA, Gomez M, et al. Anesthetic management of placenta accreta in a low-resource setting: a case series. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2015;29:329–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Anesthesiology, Città di Roma Hospital, Rome, Italy

    Giorgio Capogna

Authors
  1. Giorgio Capogna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giorgio Capogna .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Dept of Anesthesiolgy, Città di Roma Hospital, Rome, Italy

    Giorgio Capogna

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Capogna, G. (2017). Selection of Anesthesia Methods. In: Capogna, G. (eds) Anesthesia for Cesarean Section. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42053-0_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42053-0_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-42051-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-42053-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation