Abstract
In this chapter, we will study in some generality the problem of designing a feedback law to the purpose of making a controlled plant stable, and securing exact asymptotic tracking of external commands (respectively, exact asymptotic rejection of external disturbances) which belong to a fixed family of functions. The problem in question can be seen as a (broad) generalization of the classical set point control problem in the elementary theory of servomechanisms.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
If some components of w are (external) commands that certain variables of interest are required to track, then some of the components of e can be seen as tracking errors, that is differences between the actual values of those variables of interest and their expected reference values. Overall, the components of e can simply be seen as variables on which the effect of w is expected to vanish asymptotically.
- 2.
See [1].
- 3.
See Appendix A.2.
- 4.
- 5.
It is worth observing that, since by assumption the matrix S is not affected by parameter uncertainties, so is its minimal polynomial \(\psi (\lambda )\) and consequently so is the matrix \(\varPhi \) defined in (4.23).
- 6.
Note that the filter (4.49) is an invertible system, the inverse being given by
$$\begin{array}{rcl} \dot{\eta } &{}=&{} (\varPhi -G\varGamma )\eta + G\tilde{e}\\ e &{}=&{} -\varGamma \eta + \tilde{e}.\end{array}$$Hence, if \(\varGamma \) is chosen in such that a way \(\varPhi -G\varGamma \) is Hurwitz, the inverse of (4.49) is a stable system.
- 7.
Note that the subscript “e” has been dropped.
- 8.
Here and in the following we use the abbreviation “the triplet \(\{A,B,C\}\)” to mean the associated system (2.1).
- 9.
Since the parameters of the equation are \(\mu \)-dependent so is expected to be its solution.
- 10.
See Sect. 2.3.
- 11.
The approach in this section closely follows the approach described, in a more general context, in [5].
- 12.
It is seen from the construction in Example 4.1 that, in the normal form (4.11), the matrices \(P_0\) and \(P_1\) are found by means of transformations involving A, B, C, P and also S. Thus, if the former are functions of \(\mu \) and the latter is a function of \(\rho \), so are expected to be \(P_0\) and \(P_1\).
- 13.
Recall, in this respect, that both the uncertain vectors \(\mu \) and \(\rho \) range on compact sets.
- 14.
See Theorem B.6 in Appendix B.
- 15.
To prove (i), it suffices to observe that the positive-definite matrix
$$ Q= \left( \begin{matrix}1 &{} 0\\ 0&{} P_2\\ \end{matrix}\right) $$satisfies
$$\begin{aligned} QF + F^\mathrm{T}Q = \left( \begin{matrix}0 &{} 0\\ 0 &{} -I\\ \end{matrix}\right) \le 0, \end{aligned}$$and use LaSalle’s invariance principle. The proof of (ii) is achieved by direct substitution. Property (iii) is a consequence of (i) and of (ii), which says that all eigenvalues of \(F+G\varGamma _\rho \) have zero real part. Property (iv) follows from Lemma 4.8.
- 16.
- 17.
See Sect. 3.6.
References
B.A. Francis, The linear multivariable regulator problem. SIAM J. Control Optim. 14, 486–505 (1976)
B. Francis, O.A. Sebakhy, W.M. Wonham, Synthesis of multivariable regulators: the internal model principle. Appl. Math. Optim. 1, 64–86 (1974)
E.J. Davison, The robust control of a servomechanism problem for linear time-invariant multivariable systems. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 21, 25–34 (1976)
B.A. Francis, M.W. Wonham, The internal model principle of control theory. Automatica 12, 457–465 (1977)
A. Serrani, A. Isidori, L. Marconi, Semiglobal nonlinear output regulation with adaptive internal model. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, AC 46, 1178–1194 (2001)
H. Köroglu, C.W. Scherer, An LMI approach to \(H_\infty \) synthesis subject to almost asymptotic regulation constraints. Syst. Control Lett. 57, 300–308 (2008)
J. Abedor, K. Nagpal, P.P. Khargonekar, K. Poolla, Robust regulation in the presence of norm-bounded uncertainty. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 40, 147–153 (1995)
H. Köroglu, C.W. Scherer, Scheduled control for robust attenuation of non-stationary sinusoidal disturbances with measurable frequencies. Automatica 47, 504–514 (2011)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Isidori, A. (2017). Regulation and Tracking in Linear Systems. In: Lectures in Feedback Design for Multivariable Systems. Advanced Textbooks in Control and Signal Processing. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42031-8_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42031-8_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-42030-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-42031-8
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)