Abstract
This chapter focuses on gender identity and the rights claims arising on the part of transgender and intersex persons. While rights claims concerning intersexuality are only recently developing, the ECtHR has issued several judgments on the recognition of one’s preferred gender, the right to marry for transgender persons and discrimination in the welfare and healthcare sectors, as well as on the issue of compulsory divorce for married individuals who wish to have their preferred gender recognised in countries in which same-sex unions are not recognised. The chapter discusses the current limited possibilities existing for opening up a radical deconstruction of gender in these fora.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsBibliography
Ben-Asher, N. 2006. The Necessity of Sex Change: A Struggle for Intersex and Transsex Liberties. Harvard Journal of Law and Gender 29(51): 51–98.
———. 2004. Undoing Gender. New York: Routledge.
Chase, C. 1998. Hermaphrodites with Attitude: Mapping the Existence of Intersex Political Activism. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 4(2): 189–211.
Cojocariu, K. 2013. Moving Beyond Goodwin: A Fresh Assessment of the European Court of Human Rights’ Transgender Rights Jurisprudence. Interights Bulletin 17(3): 118–137.
Cruz, D. 2010. Getting Sex “Right”: Heteronormativity and Biologism in Trans and Intersex Marriage Litigation and Scholarship. Duke Journal of Gender Law and Policy 18: 203.
Davidian, A. 2011. Beyond the Locker Room: Changing Narratives on Early Surgery for Intersex Children. Wisconsin Journal of Law, Gender, & Society 26(1): 1–22.
Davy, Z. 2011. Recognising Transsexuals: Personal, Political and Medicolegal Embodiment. Farnham: Ashgate.
Dembour, M.B. 2005. Why Should Biological Sex Be Decisive? Transsexualism Before the European Court of Human Rights. In Changing Sex and Bending Gender, ed. A. Shaw, and S. Ardener. New York: Berghahn Books.
Ehrenreich, N., and M. Barr. 2005. Intersex Surgery, Female Genital Cutting, and the Selective Condemnation of “Cultural Practices”. Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review 40: 71–140.
Faithful, R. 2010. (Law)Breaking Gender: In Search of Transformative Gender Law. Journal of Gender, Social Policy and the Law 18(3): 101–115.
Fausto-Sterling, A. 2000. Sexing the Body: Gender Politics and the Construction of Sexuality. New York: Basic Books.
Garfinkel, H. 2006. Passing and the Managed Achievement of Sex Status in an “Intersexed” Person. In The Transgender Studies Reader, ed. S. Stryker, and S. Whittle. New York: Routledge.
Hermer, D. 2007. A Moratorium on Intersex Surgeries?: Law, Science, Identity, and Bioethics at the Crossroads. Cardozo Journal of Law and Gender 13(2): 255–272.
Hines, S. 2006. Intimate Transitions: Transgender Practices of Partnering and Parenting. Sociology 40: 353.
Kafka, F. 2005. In The Complete Short Stories of Franz Kafka, ed. Nahum N. Glatzer. London: Vintage Books.
Kessler, S.J. 1998. Lessons from the Intersexed. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Larson, S. 2011. Intersexuality and Gender Verification Tests: The Need to Assure Human Rights and Privacy. Pace International Law Review 23(1): 214–248.
Parlett, K., and K.M. Weston-Scheuber. 2004. Consent to Treatment for Transgender and Intersex Children. Deakin Law Review 9(2): 375–397.
———. 2013. Resolution 1952 (2013). Children’s Rights to Physical Integrity.
Pfeffer, C.A. 2012. Normative Resistance and Inventive Pragmatism: Negotiating Structure and Agency in Transgender Families. Gender and Society 26: 574.
Robson, R. 1998. Sappho Goes to Law School. New York: Columbia University Press.
Roen, K. 2002. “Either/Or” and “Both/Neither”: Discursive Tensions in Transgender Politics. Signs 27(2): 501–522.
Sandland, R. 2003. Crossing or Not Crossing: Gender, Sexuality and Melancholy in the European Court of Human Rights. Feminist Legal Studies 11(2): 191–209.
Sharpe, A. 2001. From Functionality to Aesthetics: The Architecture of Transgender Jurisprudence. Murdoch University Electronic Law Journal 8(1): 1–12.
———. 2002. Transgender Jurisprudence: Dysphoric Bodies of Law. London: Cavendish Publishing.
Sivonen, L. 2011. Gender Identity Discrimination in European Judicial Discourse. The Equal Rights Review 7: 11–26.
Spade, D. 2006. Mutilating Gender. In The Transgender Studies Reader, ed. S. Stryker, and S. Whittle, 315–323. New York: Routledge.
———. 2008. Transformations. Los Angeles Lawyer 34: 35–41.
———. 2009. Trans Law Reform Strategies, Co-optation, and the Potential for Transformative Change. Women’s Rights Law Review 30: 288.
———. 2011. Normal Life: Administrative Violence, Critical Trans Politics, and the Limits of Law. Brooklyn, NY: South End Press.
Whittle, S. 2002. Respect and Equality: Transsexual and Transgender Rights. London: Cavendish Publishing.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ammaturo, F.R. (2017). The Gendered and Sexed Citizen: Different Bodies, Different Rights?. In: European Sexual Citizenship. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41974-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41974-9_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41973-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41974-9
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)