Abstract
The number of disabled students enrolling in postsecondary education is increasing. Many online academic resources have accessibility issues that make them difficult to use by those with temporary or permanent disabilities. This current state exists despite the enactment of laws and regulations regarding accessibility as well as growing interest in the research community in accessibility and universal access. Inaccessibility of these academic resources comes to the fore in time-pressured activities such as registration, where students have a limited time to plan their classes, layout their schedule and register using these tools. In this study an alternative academic course search interface will be designed and developed. It will incorporate existing accessibility guidelines alongside universal design principles to ensure universal and equal access. The new design will be evaluated in terms of effectiveness, efficiency, subjective satisfaction and learnability by people with different abilities and disabilities. Statistical analysis will reveal whether this approach yields significant improvements over the existing tools. The goal of the new design is to significantly increase the efficiency of the current tool both for able bodied and disabled users, by simplifying the process and removing the redundant steps, while addressing the needs of all users from the outset of the design process.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Case, D.E., Davidson, R.C.: Accessible online learning. New Dir. Stud. Serv. 2011(134), 47–58 (2011)
Ofiesh, N.S., Rice, C.J., Long, E.M., Merchant, D.C., Gajar, A.H.: Service delivery for postsecondary students with disabilities: a survey of assistive technology use across disabilities. Coll. Stud. J. 36(1), 94 (2002)
Providenti, M.: Library Web accessibility at Kentucky’s 4–year degree granting colleges and universities. Lib. Mag. 10(9) (2004)
Raskind, M.H., Higgins, E.L.: Technology and learning disabilities: what do we know and where should we go. Perspect. (Montclair) 24(2), 1 (1998)
Raue, K., Lewis, L.: Students with disabilities at degree-granting postsecondary institutions. First Look. NCES 2011-018. Natl. Cent. Educ. Stat. (2011)
Fichten, C.S., Asuncion, J.V., Barile, M., Ferraro, V., Wolforth, J.: Accessibility of e-learning and computer and information technologies for students with visual impairments in postsecondary education. J. Vis. Impair. Blind. 103(9), 543–557 (2009)
Bradbard, D.A., Peters, C., Caneva, Y.: Web accessibility policies at land-grant universities. Internet High. Educ. 13(4), 258–266 (2010)
Katsiyannis, A., Zhang, D., Landmark, L., Reber, A.: Postsecondary education for individuals with disabilities legal and practice considerations. J. Disabil. Policy Stud. 20(1), 35–45 (2009)
Morin, E.C.: Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990: social integration through employment. Cath. UL Rev. 40, 189 (1990)
De Fabrique, N.: Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. In: Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology, pp. 2227–2228. Springer (2011)
McLawhorn, L.: Leveling the accessibility playing field: section 508 of the rehabilitation act. HeinOnline (2001)
Consortium, W.W.W.: Web content accessibility guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 (2008)
Hollins, N.L.: Learning disabilities and the virtual college campus: a grounded theory of accessibility. Instructional Design, development and evaluation—dissertations. Paper 55 (2012).
Lazar, J., Wentz, B., Akeley, C., Almuhim, M., Barmoy, S., Beavan, P., Beck, C., Blair, A., Bortz, A., Bradley, B.: Equal access to information? Evaluating the accessibility of public library web sites in the State of Maryland. In: Designing Inclusive Systems, pp. 185–194. Springer (2012)
Kane, S.K., Shulman, J.A., Shockley, T.J., Ladner, R.E.: A web accessibility report card for top international university web sites. In Proceedings of the 2007 International Cross-disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4A), pp. 148–156. (2007)
Horton, S., Quesenbery, W.: A web for everyone: designing accessible user experiences. Rosenfeld Media (2014)
Ye, H.: Universal design for learning in an online teacher education course: enhancing learners’ confidence to teach online. MERLOT J. Online Learn. Teach. 10 (2014)
Connell, B.R., Jones, M., Mace, R., Mueller, J., Mullick, A., Ostroff, E., Sanford, J., Steinfeld, E., Story, M., Vanderheiden, G.: The principles of universal design. 11, 2005 (1997)
Anders, R., Fechtner, D.: Universal design. Department of Industrial Design & Pratt Center for Advance Design Research, Pratt Institute (1993)
Molich, R., Nielsen, J.: Improving a human-computer dialogue. Commun. ACM 33(3), 338–348 (1990)
Lee, G., Eastman, C.M., Taunk, T., Ho, C.-H.: Usability principles and best practices for the user interface design of complex 3D architectural design and engineering tools. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 68(1), 90–104 (2010)
Tognazzini, B.: First principles of interaction design (revised & expanded). askTog, 06-Mar-2014.
Smith, N.C., Goldstein, D.G., Johnson, E.J.: Smart defaults: from hidden persuaders to adaptive helpers. INSEAD Bus. Sch. Res. Pap. 3 (2009)
Storey, M.-A., Fracchia, F.D., Müller, H.A.: Cognitive design elements to support the construction of a mental model during software exploration. J. Syst. Softw. 44(3), 171–185 (1999)
Galitz, W.O.: The essential guide to user interface design: an introduction to GUI design principles and techniques. Wiley, Boston (2007)
Gong, J., Tarasewich, P.: Guidelines for handheld mobile device interface design. In Proceedings of DSI 2004 Annual Meeting, pp. 3751–3756 (2004)
Oviatt, S., Coulston, R., Lunsford, R.: When do we interact multimodally?: cognitive load and multimodal communication patterns. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces, pp. 129–136 (2004)
Zhang, P., Small, R.V., von Dran, G.M., Barcellos, S.: Websites that satisfy users: a theoretical framework for web user interface design and evaluation. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, HICSS-32, 8Â pp (1999)
Wroblewski, L.: Mobile first. Eyrolles, Paris, ISBN: 978-1-937557-02-7 (2012)
Darroch, I., Goodman, J., Brewster, S., Gray, P.: The effect of age and font size on reading text on handheld computers. In: Human-Computer Interaction-INTERACT 2005, pp. 253–266. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Goldberg, J.H., Kotval, X.P.: Computer interface evaluation using eye movements: methods and constructs. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 24(6), 631–645 (1999)
Bangor, A., Kortum, P.T., Miller, J.T.: An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale. Int. J. Human-Comput. Interact. 24(6), 574–594 (2008)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Sardroud, O.E., Choi, Y.M. (2016). Design and Evaluation of a Universally Accessible Academic Course Search Portal. In: Di Bucchianico, G., Kercher, P. (eds) Advances in Design for Inclusion. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 500. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41962-6_31
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41962-6_31
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41961-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41962-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)