Abstract
Understanding of intent is one of the most complex traits of highly efficient teams. Combining elements of verbal and non-verbal communication along with shared mental models about mission goals and team member capabilities, intent requires knowledge about both task and teammate. Beginning with the traditional models of communication, accounting for teaming factors, such as situation awareness, and incorporating the sensing, reasoning, and tactical capabilities available via autonomous systems, a revised model of team communication is needed to accurately describe the unique interactions and understanding of intent which will occur in human-robot teams. This paper focuses on examining the issue from a system capability viewpoint, identifying which system capabilities can mirror the abilities of humans through the sensor and computing strengths of autonomous systems, thus creating a team environment which is robust and adaptable while maintaining focus on mission goals.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Intent. (n.d.): merriam-webster.com. Retrieved February 21, 2016, from http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/intent
Wang, J., Lewis, M.: Human control for cooperating robot teams. In: 2007 2nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), pp. 9–16. IEEE, Mar 2007
Chen, J.Y., Barnes, M.J.: Human-agent teaming for multirobot control: a review of human factors issues. IEEE Trans. Hum. Mach. Syst. 44(1), 13–29 (2014)
Doare, R., Danet, D., Hanon, J.P.: Robots on the battlefield: contemporary issues and implications for the future. Maroon Ebooks (2014)
Chen, T., Campbell, D., Gonzalez, F., Coppin, G.: The effect of autonomy transparency in human-robot interactions: a preliminary study on operator cognitive workload and situation awareness in multiple heterogeneous UAV management. In: Proceedings of Australasian Conference on Robotics and Automation 2014, pp. 1–10. Australian Robotics & Automation Association ARAA, Dec 2014
Zhang, Y., Narayanan, V., Chakraborti, T., Kambhampati, S.: A human factors analysis of proactive support in human-robot teaming. In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (2015)
Chen, J.Y., Barnes, M.J., Qu, Z.: RoboLeader: an agent for supervisory control of multiple robots. In: Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 81–82. IEEE Press, Mar 2010
Schramm, W.: How communication works. In: Schramm, W. (ed.) The Process and Effects of Communication, pp. 3–26. University of Illinois Press, Champaign (1954)
Berlo, D.K.: The Process of Communication: An Introduction To Theory And Practice. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York (1960)
Endsley, M.R.: Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. 37(1), 32–64 (1995)
Salas, E., Prince, C., Baker, D.P., Shrestha, L.: Situation awareness in team performance: implications for measurement and training. Hum. Factors J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. 37(1), 123–136 (1995)
Salas, E., Cooke, N.J., Rosen, M.A.: On teams, teamwork, and team performance: discoveries and developments. Hum. Factors J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. 50(3), 540–547 (2008)
Salas, E., Dickinson, T.L., Converse, S.A., Tannenbaum, S.I.: Toward an understanding of team performance and training (1992)
Converse, S.: Shared mental models in expert team decision making. Individ. Group Decis. Making Current 1993, 221 (1993)
Lim, B.C., Klein, K.J.: Team mental models and team performance: a field study of the effects of team mental model similarity and accuracy. J. Organ. Behav. 27(4), 403–418 (2006)
Mathieu, J.E., Heffner, T.S., Goodwin, G.F., Salas, E., Cannon-Bowers, J.A.: The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. J. Appl. Psychol. 85(2), 273 (2000)
Rouse, W.B., Cannon-Bowers, J.A., Salas, E.: The role of mental models in team performance in complex systems. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 22(6), 1296–1308 (1992)
Stout, R.J., Cannon-Bowers, J.A., Salas, E., Milanovich, D.M.: Planning, shared mental models, and coordinated performance: An empirical link is established. Hum. Factors J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. 41(1), 61–71 (1999)
Gurtner, A., Tschan, F., Semmer, N.K., Nägele, C.: Getting groups to develop good strategies: effects of reflexivity interventions on team process, team performance, and shared mental models. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 102(2), 127–142 (2007)
Nikolaidis, S., Shah, J.: Human-robot teaming using shared mental models. ACM/IEEE HRI (2012)
Clark, H.H.: Using Language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996)
Clark, H.H., Brennan, S.E.: Grounding in communication. Perspect. Soc. Shared Cogn. 13(1991), 127–149 (1991)
Bohus, D., Horvitz, E.: On the challenges and opportunities of physically situated dialog. In: AAAI Fall Symposium: Dialog with Robots, Nov 2010
Lemon, O., Bracy, A., Gruenstein, A., Peters, S.: The WITAS multi-modal dialogue system I. In: INTERSPEECH, pp. 1559–1562, Sept 2001
Marge, M., Pappu, A., Frisch, B., Harris, T.K., Rudnicky, A.I.: Exploring spoken dialog interaction in human-robot teams. In: Proceedings of Robots, Games, and Research: Success Stories in USARSim IROS Workshop (2009)
Marge, M., Rudnicky, A.I.: Miscommunication recovery in physically situated dialogue. In: Proceedings of SIGdial (2015)
Skantze, G.: Exploring human error recovery strategies: implications for spoken dialogue systems. Speech Commun. 45(3), 325–341 (2005)
Streeck, J., Knapp, M.L.: The interaction of visual and verbal features in human communication. Adv. Nonverbal Commun. 3–23 (1992)
Baron-Cohen, S., Campbell, R., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Grant, J., Walker, J.: Are children with autism blind to the mentalistic significance of the eyes? Br. J. Dev. Psychol. 13(4), 379–398 (1995)
Hoffman, M.W., Grimes, D.B., Shon, A.P., Rao, R.P.: A probabilistic model of gaze imitation and shared attention. Neural Netw. 19(3), 299–310 (2006)
Lockerd, A., Breazeal, C.: Tutelage and socially guided robot learning. In: 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IROS 2004. Proceedings, vol. 4, pp. 3475–3480. IEEE, Sept 2004
Strabala, K.W., Lee, M.K., Dragan, A.D., Forlizzi, J.L., Srinivasa, S., Cakmak, M., Micelli, V.: Towards seamless human-robot handovers. J. Hum. Robot Interact. 2(1), 112–132 (2013)
Huang, C.M., Andrist, S., Sauppé, A., Mutlu, B.: Using gaze patterns to predict task intent in collaboration. Front. Psychol. 6 (2015)
Handwerk, B.: 5 Surprising drone uses (Besides Amazon Delivery), National Geographic. Retrieved March 2, 2016 from http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2013/12/131202-drone-uav-uas-amazon-octocopter-bezos-science-aircraft-unmanned-robot/
Charniak, E., Goldman, R.P.: Probabilistic Abduction for Plan Recognition. Brown University, Department of Computer Science (1991)
Sakita, K., Ogawara, K., Murakami, S., Kawamura, K., Ikeuchi, K.: Flexible cooperation between human and robot by interpreting human intention from gaze information. In: 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IROS 2004. Proceedings, vol. 1, pp. 846–851. IEEE, Sept 2004
Park, H.S., Jain, E., Sheikh, Y.: 3d social saliency from head-mounted cameras. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 431–439 (2012)
Soo Park, H., Shi, J.: Social saliency prediction. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 4777–4785 (2015)
Hopcroft, J., Motwani, R., Ullman, J.: Introduction to Automata Theory, Languages, and Computation. Pearson, London (2013)
Matuszek, C., Herbst, E., Zettlemoyer, L., Fox, D.: Learning to parse natural language commands to a robot control system. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Experimental Robotics, pp. 403–415 (2013)
Dantam, N., Stilman, M.: The motion grammar: analysis of a linguistic method for robot control. IEEE Trans. Robot. 29(3), 704–718 (2013)
Kress-Gazit, H., Fainekos, G.E., Pappas, G.J.: Temporal-logic-based reactive mission and motion planning. IEEE Trans. Robot. 25(6), 1370–1381 (2009)
Parks, D., Borji, A., Itti, L.: Augmented saliency model using automatic 3d head pose detection and learned gaze following in natural scenes. Vision. Res. 116, 113–126 (2015)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
William Evans, A. et al. (2017). The Future of Human Robot Teams in the Army: Factors Affecting a Model of Human-System Dialogue Towards Greater Team Collaboration. In: Savage-Knepshield, P., Chen, J. (eds) Advances in Human Factors in Robots and Unmanned Systems. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 499. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41959-6_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41959-6_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41958-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41959-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)